Re: Node side processing

2014-02-27 Thread Tupshin Harper
Hi David, Check out the ongoing discussion in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6704 as well as some related tickets linked to from that one. No consensus at this point, but I'm personally hoping to see something along the general lines of Hive's UDFs. -Tupshin On Thu, Feb 27, 20

Re: Pointers on writing your own Compaction Strategy

2014-09-07 Thread Tupshin Harper
In addition to what Markus said, take a look at the latest patch in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6602 for a relevant example. -Tupshin On Sep 4, 2014 2:28 PM, "Marcus Eriksson" wrote: > 1. create a class that extends AbstractCompactionStrategy (i would keep it > in-tree while

Re: 0.6.3

2010-06-18 Thread Tupshin Harper
Contrary to my expectations and Jonathan's, Cassandra rebuilds cleanly against the latest thrift source (and any recent snapshot), with no code changes. This is important because it includes the patches for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-601 which, in turn, causes https://issues.ap

Re: 0.6.3

2010-06-18 Thread Tupshin Harper
On 6/18/2010 1:24 PM, Eric Evans wrote: On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:25 -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote: I would like to nominate #475 for inclusion in 0.6.3. It would require picking a stable recent snapshot of the thrift libs, replacing the existing libthrift jar, and rebuilding interface/thrift

Re: network compatibility from 0.6 to 0.7

2010-07-22 Thread Tupshin Harper
As long as network compatibility is in place, it is possible to incrementally upgrade a cluster by restricting thrift clients to only talk to the 0.6 nodes until half the cluster is upgraded and then modify them to talk to the 0.7 nodes. If networking compatibility breaks, there is no way to avoid

Re: Proposal: require Java7 for Cassandra 2.0

2013-02-06 Thread Tupshin Harper
+1 On Feb 6, 2013 5:22 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote: > Java 6 EOL is this month. Java 7 will be two years old when C* 2.0 > comes out (July). Anecdotally, a bunch of people are running C* on > Java7 with no issues, except for the Snappy-on-OS-X problem (which > will be moot if LZ4 becomes our def