Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-30 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Sylvain Lebresne > wrote: >> I'm back from that beach. Eric, do you want me to do the re-roll ? > > I was planning to, (later this morning or early afternoon), but if > you'd rather take it,  you're welcome to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-30 Thread Eric Evans
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > I'm back from that beach. Eric, do you want me to do the re-roll ? I was planning to, (later this morning or early afternoon), but if you'd rather take it, you're welcome to it. :) Also, welcome back. -- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-29 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
I'm back from that beach. Eric, do you want me to do the re-roll ? -- Sylvain On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > I guess we should probably re-roll; ERROR log messages tend to freak > people out even if they are innocuous. > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Eric Evans w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-29 Thread Jonathan Ellis
I guess we should probably re-roll; ERROR log messages tend to freak people out even if they are innocuous. On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> Is this really a -1-worthy problem?  It will log an assertion but my >> rea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-29 Thread Jake Luciani
That's valid. It's more of a annoyance. +0 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Is this really a -1-worthy problem? It will log an assertion but my > reading is that GCInspector should continue to run the next time it is > scheduled. > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-27 Thread Eric Evans
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Is this really a -1-worthy problem?  It will log an assertion but my > reading is that GCInspector should continue to run the next time it is > scheduled. What's the verdict here? Should we close out this vote and re-roll after https://is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-26 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Is this really a -1-worthy problem? It will log an assertion but my reading is that GCInspector should continue to run the next time it is scheduled. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Jake Luciani wrote: > -1 due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3076 > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-25 Thread Jake Luciani
-1 due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3076 On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > While Sylvain is sunning himself on a beach somewhere[3], I propose > the following for release as 0.7.9[4]. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandr

[VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.7.9

2011-08-23 Thread Eric Evans
While Sylvain is sunning himself on a beach somewhere[3], I propose the following for release as 0.7.9[4]. SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7@r1160879 Debian Package Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/co