I personally think we should move this forward for the reasons mentioned
beforehand. Widening to a long value seems to be the most pragmatic
approach if we want to get this in for 4.0. Alternatively, we can let
operators choose the precision int vs long in case TTLs are not used.
I'd be happy to
We will have to deal with fixing this TTL issue eventually as more users
start to deal with the boundaries of currently allowed TTL (which keeps
declining). It will be neat if we can get this into 4.0 before it is
released - be it in beta or future 4.0 alpha(s) - the sooner the better, as
everyone
1.During ApacheCon, Laxmikant approached me to discuss CASSANDRA-14227. It
was also raised on the list back in January.
Taking a closer look, it probably is not very difficult for us to fix this –
either by treating the int as unsigned, or by widening it to a long value.
Since this
