On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 22:29 -0400, Joseph Stein wrote:
> right now I just manually put this function back in since it is the
> only thing (well the license too of course) that the generation
> changed from what is in source besides my change required.
I wouldn't worry much about this. Do the bes
using 0.6.1 it went better, almost perfect
the diff is still removing this code though and not sure why
@Override
public int hashCode() {
-HashCodeBuilder builder = new HashCodeBuilder();
-
-boolean present_name = true && (isSetName());
-builder.append(present_name);
-if (pr
0.8 uses thrift 0.6
On Jul 2, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Joseph Stein wrote:
> So I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2833
>
> And when I generate the cassandra.thrift file I am getting weird results and
> differences
>
> Should I be modifying the CounterColumn.java by h
So I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2833
And when I generate the cassandra.thrift file I am getting weird results and
differences
Should I be modifying the CounterColumn.java by hand?
I am using thrift 0.5.0 and doing
thrift -gen java cassandra.thrift from the com
