Re: Removing @author tags

2008-11-11 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Nice, thanks. Andrus On Nov 11, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: Next step in cleaning Cayenne code can be removal of using of deprecated methods, unused imports etc. I'm currently looking at modeler code, so I could do the work 2008/11/11, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: Removing @author tags

2008-11-11 Thread Andrey Razumovsky
Next step in cleaning Cayenne code can be removal of using of deprecated methods, unused imports etc. I'm currently looking at modeler code, so I could do the work 2008/11/11, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yeah, if you have a spare minute, I'd appreciate doing that on trunk. > > Thanks,

Re: Nested context on ROP proposal

2008-11-11 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 11/11/2008, at 11:12 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: Are you suggesting developers to keep same validation on client & server in this case? Well, this means that we prefer first solution - to do nothing :-) Actually I can think of situations when special server validation is needed - e.g.

Re: Nested context on ROP proposal

2008-11-11 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 11/11/2008, at 11:12 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: Are you suggesting developers to keep same validation on client & server in this case? Well, this means that we prefer first solution - to do nothing :-) Easy ;-) Actually I can think of situations when special server validation is nee

Re: Nested context on ROP proposal

2008-11-11 Thread Andrey Razumovsky
Thanks for your answer > > So validation works *on client* within >> context which called commitChanges(). Changes to server (with server >> validation & lifecycles) will proceed through all context hierarchy if you >> call CayenneContext.commitChanges(), >> not CayenneContext.commitChangesToPare

Re: Nested context on ROP proposal

2008-11-11 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 24/10/2008, at 8:02 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: Would committing a nested context on the client cause a connection to be made to the server and lifecycle events, validation run on the server for objects in that context? If so, will changes which are made by lifecycle events (eg. new ob

Re: Cayenne-trunk - Build # 259 - Failure

2008-11-11 Thread Andrus Adamchik
On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote: The Apache Hudson build system has built Cayenne-trunk (build #259) Status: Failure Check console output at http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson//job/Cayenne-trunk/259/ to view the results. Looks like the last commit stripped cl

Cayenne-trunk - Build # 259 - Failure

2008-11-11 Thread Apache Hudson Server
The Apache Hudson build system has built Cayenne-trunk (build #259) Status: Failure Check console output at http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson//job/Cayenne-trunk/259/ to view the results.