So Lachlan just confirmed that there's no issue with callbacks. We are
cleared to go ahead with the release.
However since there were a few new bugs discovered and fixed in the
last week, I am recalling this vote, and will tag 3.0-STABLE branch
one more time and post the new artifacts somew
Ugh -- sorry all.
We did have some custom code handling this after all that needed
updating. So on initial test it seems fine.
On 02/11/2009, at 2:23 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
So you've not configured callbacks in model - have you added callbacks
through LifecycleCallbackRegistry or some
On 02/11/2009, at 2:23 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
So you've not configured callbacks in model - have you added callbacks
through LifecycleCallbackRegistry or something? Could you give a
snippet?
Could you ensure that both prePersist and postAdd callbacks are
invoked
(e.g. add a breakpoint
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> For all its undeniable advantages, IMO the main usability issue with
> CayenneModeler is the fact that it is separate from an IDE. This "gap"
> results in the following problems:
>
> 1. Losing work context when switching between the apps:
>
On Nov 2, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I say we move the issue to resolved/closed unless it pops up again.
Anyone else agree?
+1.
In fact I just closed it as "Can't reproduce"
Andrus
I say we move the issue to resolved/closed unless it pops up again.
Anyone else agree?
mrg
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I don't see it anymore either. So hopefully that was something that Apple
> fixed.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Nov 2, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Michael Gentry wrote
I don't see it anymore either. So hopefully that was something that
Apple fixed.
Andrus
On Nov 2, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Andrus,
I haven't noticed this issue in 3.0B1's modeler (and I've done several
schema generations). Perhaps the issue got fixed or an OS X Java
update (
Andrus,
I haven't noticed this issue in 3.0B1's modeler (and I've done several
schema generations). Perhaps the issue got fixed or an OS X Java
update (I'm on Leopard -- 10.5.8) solved it? I definitely noticed the
issue a while back using the 3.0M6 modeler, as did others here.
mrg
java -vers
On Nov 2, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
At that point, you'd be much better off
building it as an RCP app and then looking to integrate that with
Eclipse.
That's what I was thinking about.
Andrus
> I too like the basic concept of an Eclipse based tool. Sure we'll annoy a
> bunch of IDEA/Netbeans users, but they can still fire up Eclipse to use the
> modeler. Maybe it is 120Mb larger than CayenneModeler, but it still would
> work.
This, to me, would not be an acceptable solution. I just wo
In the meanwhile, I'll continue my research with JGraph. Nobody knows, what
will come out of this plugin idea. After all, provided it is constanly
improved, CM can become a "studio" that plugin will never be
2009/11/2 Andrus Adamchik
>
> On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
>
On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Bob Schellink wrote:
Preferences > General > Workspace > Refresh Automatically
Haven't tried it, but looks like something that would cause race
conditions, conflicting with command line builds, git updates, etc.
Andrus
You guys probably know this already but Eclipse does have support for refreshing files outside the
IDE. It uses polling though, so it far from perfect:
Preferences > General > Workspace > Refresh Automatically
Not sure about IDEA but Netbeans also supports this feature.
kind regards
bob
An
On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Once again, I'm all for Cayenne-Eclipse plugin, but I'm sceptical
about its
future in current state of Cayenne community
I agree with this assessment.
On the other hand there is a chance that starting a prototype will
cause interest i
Yes, I can add joins and some other keywords. Also I can make keywords
to upper case and some more tunning.
I am wondering if there is some SQL format standard like Sun
conventions for Java?
It will be nice if you point someone to me...
Evgeny.
2009/11/2 Andrus Adamchik :
> Agreed - a good idea.
Hi,
In ideal world, it is surely better to rewrite modeler with SWT. But CM is
too big application to do it in a couple of weekends. My main question is:
who will be doing the work? Personally I am weak with SWT and most likely
will not participate.
Moreover, it is obvious that such plugin will be
On 2/11/09 8:19 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
That would've been ideal, but likely won't work. IIRC Mike from WOLips
commented on that at one point, saying it is not possible to have a
single tool for both Cayenne and EOF. I think he looked at the Modeler
initially (or maybe even used some of the co
On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
Well, there already is an ugliness that quite a bit of Modeler
specific code lives in the main Cayenne jar. So pulling that out
into a ui-core library is probably the first step. Should the main
Cayenne jar even know how to *write* th
On 2/11/09 7:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Or we can go with some hybrid approach of having an Eclipse plugin
exchanging events with the Modeler. Not sure if we can make the user
experience as nice, we'll have to support 2 tools instead of 1, and
we'll have to support an extra messaging layer. Bu
Here is one of those "big strategy" emails that tend to have negative
impact on things that we can do here and now, instead of doing the
"right" thing some time later. So no intent to discourage CAY-762
implementation, just a somewhat related issue that we may discuss in
parallel.
For all
Same here.
On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Actually, no. My test shows everything's all right, so some more
info is
required
2 ноября 2009 г. 14:01 пользователь Aristedes Maniatis
написал:
On 2/11/09 6:52 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I will rebuild the release artifa
Actually, no. My test shows everything's all right, so some more info is
required
2 ноября 2009 г. 14:01 пользователь Aristedes Maniatis
написал:
> On 2/11/09 6:52 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>>
>> I will rebuild the release artifacts (maybe even delete the tag, and
>> create a fresh tag from ST
On 2/11/09 6:52 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I will rebuild the release artifacts (maybe even delete the tag, and
create a fresh tag from STABLE, as it contains substantial bug fixes
from last week), but let's wait till we come to some conclusion on the
Lachlan's issue.
I'm not sure if Lachlan w
23 matches
Mail list logo
