SQL Logging in 3.0

2010-07-10 Thread Michael Gentry
Has anyone noticed/experienced the following logging anomaly in 3.0? INFO: INSERT INTO Users (first_name, id, last_name, password, role, username) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) INFO: [bind: 1->first_name:'Wesley', 2->last_name:203, 3->password:'Perry', 4->role:NULL, 5->username:NULL, 6->username:'wpe

Re: Local Object

2010-07-10 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 11/07/2010, at 3:21 AM, Michael Gentry wrote: > Well, if you want it in CayenneDataObject, you'd have to pass the > target ObjectContext to the method, but that might be a pretty good > place for it, too. Silly me (for replying when tired), thanks. That was what I meant to say. public T local

Re: Local Object

2010-07-10 Thread Michael Gentry
Well, if you want it in CayenneDataObject, you'd have to pass the target ObjectContext to the method, but that might be a pretty good place for it, too. mrg On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote: > On 10/07/2010, at 2:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> >> On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:41 P

Re: Local Object

2010-07-10 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 10/07/2010, at 2:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > >> I was thinking we'd add a utility type method for now. > > Cool. > >> I have no >> expectations of modifying 3.0 for this, but was thinking it might be >> good in the future to have som