Yes. 3.1 is early alpha. The docs are updated slower than the code. But we are
getting there.
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> IIRC it uses whatever name you put in "filter-name" in web.xml for
>> CayenneFilter:
>>
>>
>>THIS_NAME_IS_SIGNIFICANT
>>
>>
> IIRC it uses whatever name you put in "filter-name" in web.xml for
> CayenneFilter:
>
>
> THIS_NAME_IS_SIGNIFICANT
>
> org.apache.cayenne.configuration.web.CayenneFilter
>
Oh you wise man, thanks much. You are right.
Guess, this needs an update:
http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/w
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> The default behaviour for the property configuration is to look for
> CayenneFilter.xml, if running with a web filter.
> But does this name make sense? It should contain a domain
> configuration. And these files should be named like
> caye
Hello,
I just upgraded from 3.0 with the modeler.
The new Cayenne looks very promising - thanks for the work so far!
However a few comments.
The default behaviour for the property configuration is to look for
CayenneFilter.xml, if running with a web filter.
But does this name make sense? It sho
