-Original Message-
From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:32 PM
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ant vs Maven [Was: Building 3.0 from trunk]
But it is possible. Different ant build.xml files or
different targets within one
On 26/02/2007, at 12:55 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
* We joined the club of gullible people who bought into the Maven
hype (I thought such thing would never happen to me :-)), so now we
have a common (though crappy) platform for integration of the code
from different projects up and down
FYI:
3.0 (trunk) can be built with Maven for quite some time into a nice
release assembly:
http://cayenne.apache.org/building-cayenne.html
If integration tests are giving you hard time, skip them:
-Dmaven.test.skip=true
(at the moment they will, as a bug fix that I submitted for
3.0 (trunk) can be built with Maven for quite some time into a nice
release assembly:
http://cayenne.apache.org/building-cayenne.html
Yes, but compare the two (1.2/2.0 and 3.0):
e.g. in /bin there's a 30MB CayenneModeler.jar full of junk files.
I would like the nice distribution package
e.g. in /bin there's a 30MB CayenneModeler.jar full of junk files.
Hmm, indeed - there's lots of junk in that file. Good catch.
I think this is a result of recent Maven upgrade from 2.0.4 - 2.0.5.
I just tried to build with 2.0.4 and got a 5MB file back. Appreciate
filing a bug - we'll
I think this is a result of recent Maven upgrade from 2.0.4 - 2.0.5.
Yes, I did the upgrade since there was mentioned everywhere that 2.0.5 fixes
*severe* bugs (I miss ANT :) ).
Appreciate filing a bug
OK.
Is the Cayenne JIRA different from the Apache one(e.g. during the incubator)? It looks
On 2/23/07, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
PS. I think I kind of miss Ant, too.
I know some people may want to do me physical damage for this, but
should we reconsider the maven choice?
As a maven end-user, I'm not impressed, but that's probably because I
don't have maven-based
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
On 2/23/07, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
PS. I think I kind of miss Ant, too.
I know some people may want to do me physical damage for this, but
should we reconsider the maven choice?
As a maven end-user, I'm not
