> On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> (taking to dev)
>>
>> Seems kind of pointless API to me.
>
> It would at least be a redundant API if there's a standardized way of
> fetching the Implementation-Version f
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> (taking to dev)
>
> Seems kind of pointless API to me.
It would at least be a redundant API if there's a standardized way of
fetching the Implementation-Version field, which there is.
(taking to dev)
Seems kind of pointless API to me.
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
> Maybe we should add a Cayenne.getVersion() method?
>
>
>
>> On Jul 27, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>
>> Our jar MANIFEST file also contains:
>>
>> Bundle-Version:
Moving to dev.
Ok. I'll plan on making the change when I get a chance.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>
>> Our jar MANIFEST file also contains:
>>
>> Bundle-Version: 4.0.0.M2
>
> Yeah, that's OSGi stuff.
>
>>
