Thanks for your positive feedback, I'll draft 0.6.0-rc0 soon.
Thanks,
Fei Wang
On 2025/05/09 14:30:40 rexxiong wrote:
> +1，Thanks Fei for driving this.
>
> Thanks,
> Jiashu Xiong
>
> Nicholas 于2025年5月9日周五 14:44写道：
>
> > +1. Thanks for driving.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nicholas Jiang
> >
> >
>
To add on to my answer for the 4th question -- internally we have this
value to 50% given our interruption notice period is 24h.
Thanks,
Aravind
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 2:46 PM Aravind Patnam wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Thanks for the feedback and questions! Let me answer your questions below.
>
Hi Nicholas,
Thanks for the feedback and questions! Let me answer your questions below.
> 1. Why is the lack of Flink replication support the motivation for
disruption aware slot selection? Do you mean that disruption aware slot
selection helps to reduce recompution costs for Flink without replic
Hi Aravind,
Thanks for driving the proposal of interruption aware slot selection. I have
some comments for this proposal:
1. Why is the lack of Flink replication support the motivation for disruption
aware slot selection? Do you mean that disruption aware slot selection helps to
reduce recompu
