Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

Hi Lewis, I think OCW has some critical bugs to be fixed. I am not sure who else is testing OCW libraries with all the datasets mentioned on http://rcmes.jpl.nasa.gov At least, the RCMES based on OCW is about to reach a milestone. To achieve this, several people have worked hard during the

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

Hi Kyo, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, wrote: > > -1 Do not release the package because there are many important pull > requests under pending now. >I just wonder if there are any reasons to expedite the release. > > Thanks, > Kyo > > Thanks for taking

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

So why can't we roll a release immediately after the open PRs are eventually resolved? We gladly support RCMES but the state of a product there shouldn't be hindering an OCW release, especially not given how easy it is to roll another release if we want to include some useful features that come

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

Kyo, Do you have a specific pull request(s) that you think need to be in the 1.0.0 release and couldn't wait until the next release? That might help us get started moving in the direction to getting everything resolved! -- Jimmy On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Joyce

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

I am so sorry that I was too busy to read all the discussion and VOTE threads. I am now raising issues on the decision made early September. I know that I should have lead this discussion earlier. Whenever we start voting for future releases, why don’t we make it sure that all of those who have

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

Those seem like great features Kyo! I still don't understand why that can't be in 1.0.1 outside of an arbitrary decision that they should be in 1.0.0 though. The discuss thread for 1.0.0 was started Aug 31, the RC for 1.0.0 was posted Sep 3 with the VOTE thread. Seems a bit ridiculous to me to

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

I play devil¹s advocate and argue that version 1.0.0 release is a good chance to complete Pull Request 666, 672 and 674 and make the ocw-cli work well with the datasets described on http://rcmes.jpl.nasa.gov Thanks, Kyo On 9/23/15, 10:44 AM, "mltjo...@gmail.com on behalf of Michael Joyce"

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

It's not the PMC's job to force people to participate. That's why we can't wait forever for people to comment. Look at how many people we have on the PMC vs how many people we have participating in this vote thread. We would never get a release out if we did that! As for what version increases