Hi Alena,
Thanks for the FS.
I was going through the FS, is InternalLBVM is a new system VM?A new system
VM template will be there of the same VPCVR/VR template is used.
Am making changes such that at Traffic to Web tier is balanced by NetScaler on
the public side.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
> --
Oh, Thanks.. but I can't find where default tty linux is preinstalled.
Also, if the ping from SSVM to my laptop is working, why am I still seeing
nfs://server:path Alert State Not found
on my Dashboard? It means something is still wrong?
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On
Hi Chip,
Yes, it applies cleanly on top of 4.1, compiles, and I tested it out to ensure
that the baremetal options/APIs aren't available post these changes. The
previous patch I uploaded actually applied cleanly in my workspace, so I
explicitly asked for whether the patch applied cleanly or not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10045/#review18304
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jessica Tomechak
On March 22, 2013, 4:38 a.m
Chip, Vijay:
Let me know When the build is ready, I can help test if baremetal feature has
been deactivated from UI.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:04 PM
To: ; Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Cc: Frank Zhang; Kelven Yang;
Can *you* check it first please? Does it apply cleanly? Does it compile?
On Mar 22, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati
wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 11:55 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang
This is now resolved - RB should work again. Please test and let me
know if that isn't the case.
--David
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:07 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6042
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan
> wrote:
>> Yes, I am unabl
Francois,
We do plan to support a Netscaler VPX as an Internal LB provider - I've
mentioned it in the spec.
The reason we adding support for VPC networks only - most of the customers
are interested in this particular use case to be supported. Due to limited
time frame for dev/qa I'm planning to c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10072/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 11:13 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chi
Maybe extend to netscaler and also regular networks?
I filed a ticket recently for the same feature request.
Francois
On 2013-03-22 6:58 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
> I would like to propose a new feature - "Internal Load Balancing between
> VPC tiers". With the feature support, you can set
I would like to propose a new feature - "Internal Load Balancing between
VPC tiers". With the feature support, you can set up the Load Balancer
inside the VPC without facing the public network side. It will allow to
balance internal traffic between tiers inside the VPC - for example,
traffic comin
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> The task of creating the 4.1 Release Notes is tracked in the bug noted
> below. This is the time in the release cycle where lots of ideas pop up
> about things we should be sure to mention in the Release Notes. It would
> be great to have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10094/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
see bug:
I pulled latest master today, build also failed for me, but it failed at
running this unit test case (different from yours):
T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors:
The task of creating the 4.1 Release Notes is tracked in the bug noted
below. This is the time in the release cycle where lots of ideas pop up
about things we should be sure to mention in the Release Notes. It would be
great to have a way to keep track of those ideas. I've started by adding a
coupl
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:06:26AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "Chip Childers"
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
The default tty linux is preinstalled inside devcloud VM, so at least, there is
one user VM template is available.
But downloading a new template won't work.
For better network support, you may need to try devcloud-kvm:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/devcloud-kvm.html
> -Original Messa
Hi,
I am using DevCloud for Secondary Storage. SSVM is started but Console
Proxy VM is not.
On dashboard it gives Alert State Detected.
I am able to ping my machine from SSVM.
Can someone explain how I can get out of this?
Thanks.
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
KVM Sorry!
v/r
Sean
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Which hypervisor?
>
> On 3/22/13 4:19 AM, "Sean Truman" wrote:
>
>>All,
>>
>>I would like to use NFS over RDMA using the -o rdma option flag on the
>>mount command on primary storage is there a script that would allo
Then how can the template be downloaded if I am not able to connect to
internet from SSVM?
Thanks.
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 22
Sudha,
See my comments to 1791; it should be re-assigned to Edison as it happens
in the code he wrote for Storage management.
-Alena.
On 3/22/13 12:44 PM, "Sudha Ponnaganti"
wrote:
>Below are the blockers/critical - removed bare metal related ones from
>the list.
>
>Alena - can you review 17
Corrected query to narrow down to 41 defects - 98 belong to this release
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20priority%20in%20(Blocker%2C%20Critical)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%224.1.0%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20OR
Team,
I am going over the resolved Critical / Blocker defects and closing them based
on testing done so far. But there are few defects recently resolved for which
testing is either still in progress or I do not have the results to triage them
and close them. Can you take action for your defects
> -Original Message-
> From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 12:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Issue regarding SSVM on DevCloud
>
> Hi,
> I was able to create a zone and configure it successfully. But have problem
> wit
Hello Mice,
I asked the following question on the community already. Since the following
thread is active, I am reposting the question again in this email thread for
answers that will help me work with the feature on XenServer,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Chandan Purus
Thanks Sudha and Chip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 4:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Blocker Defects to cut RC
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Ah! Triaged it and targeted it to 4.1 - Now it shows up in the list.
Gotcha. Timing problems! Thanks Sudha.
>
> Also deprioritized the following defect to Major instead of critical - still
> targeted it to 4.1 - https://issu
Ah! Triaged it and targeted it to 4.1 - Now it shows up in the list.
Also deprioritized the following defect to Major instead of critical - still
targeted it to 4.1 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-590
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sun
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:07:48PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>
>
> On 3/22/13 12:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >After running through the steps, I get this error:
> >
> > mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl
> >:cloud-marvin integration-test
> > E
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:12:25PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Chip
>
> Can we consider adding "CLOUDSTACK-1733 [ACS41][UI] Add guest network is
> missing ip range fields and missing network offerings" to the list below?
It's a blocker for the release.
Sudha, not sure why it's not in the li
Which hypervisor?
On 3/22/13 4:19 AM, "Sean Truman" wrote:
>All,
>
>I would like to use NFS over RDMA using the -o rdma option flag on the
>mount command on primary storage is there a script that would allow me
>to do this or could you point me in the right direction in the code to
>make the nec
CLOUDSTACK-827 is to document the new Advanced Search feature that Brian
developed. It's still unassigned and no work appears to have been done
yet. Should I promote this to an improvement, and tie the docs to
4.1.1? I'm assuming that nobody has these docs squirrelled away
somewhere, just waiting
Chip
Can we consider adding "CLOUDSTACK-1733 [ACS41][UI] Add guest network is
missing ip range fields and missing network offerings" to the list below?
I don't see how one can create networks - unless they use API calls or
CloudMonkey.
Thanks
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip C
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-889
I see notes about testing in the parent ticket (the feature ticket), but
I don't see any assignee or progress noted on testing this feature in
the QA task. Can someone update the QA task and resolve if we're done
testing?
If there are *enhance
On 3/22/13 12:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>
>After running through the steps, I get this error:
>
> mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl
>:cloud-marvin integration-test
> ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use
> ERROR: JDWP Transport
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:44:35PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Below are the blockers/critical - removed bare metal related ones from the
> list.
>
> Alena - can you review 1791 and see if you can fix it or may be someone else
> can pick it up if they have expertise in this area
> Prachi -
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:27:44PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:39:03AM -0400, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:01:49AM -0500, prasanna wrote:
> > > On 8 March 2013 22:24, Alex Huang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to start off a branch spe
Below are the blockers/critical - removed bare metal related ones from the
list.
Alena - can you review 1791 and see if you can fix it or may be someone else
can pick it up if they have expertise in this area
Prachi - Same with 1776 - can you review and set it unassigned if this is not
in your
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:35:02AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Alright Chip, I have pushed in the unit tests for CitrixResourceBase and
> will work with Prasanna to learn writing the marvin tests and will push
> them shortly as well.
Great!
> Lets please merge the feature as I think the unit test
Hi,
I was able to create a zone and configure it successfully. But have
problem with IP Configuration of SSVM on my DevCloud.
I am running Management Server on my laptop.
Please see the following config and let me know where I am going wrong.
My IP:192.168.12.X
VirtualBox Network interface is 192.1
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:56 AM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Baremetal blockers - To remove Baremetal from UI
>
> On Fri, Mar 2
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:43 AM
>> >
>> > So what we are *REALLY* talking about here, is that an experimental
>> > feature from past releases was modif
Hi all,
I'm not going to cut the RC today, due to the outstanding bugs that we
are still working on.
Let's keep pushing to get things wrapped up. I've been trying to get
review requests *with my name on them* and / or "Patch Request" emails
done as soon as I can... keep them coming!
-chip
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:43 AM
> >
> > So what we are *REALLY* talking about here, is that an experimental
> > feature from past releases was modified for 4.1 but is broken
> > completely now.
> >
> > IMO we need to
Seems /etc/dhcphosts.txt is not getting configured correctly in my setup using
cisco-vnmc-integration branch. The content of /etc/dhcphosts.txt file looks
like below.
-m,set:02:00:04:b2:00:01,02:00:04:b2:00:01,-4,infinite
As this line is changed to following, instance could successfully acquire
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9908/#review18280
---
Commit f4f78311b3b5ef5c404a4d06b6832cb3b1c2c4c4 in branch refs/heads/
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:06:26AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "Chip Childers"
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> A
> > >> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, "Chip Childers"
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:03:49PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > 2. Add Cluster
> > - Baremetal show up in list of hypervisors. This is coming from
> > listHypervisors command
> >
> > How
I would like to propose a new subfeature for the VPC - Blacklist of
Routes. It will allow admin to block certain routes so they can't be
configured as Static Routes for the VPC Private gateway.
The detailed requirements are listed in the Jira ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTA
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10088/#review18279
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastien Goasguen
On March 22, 2013, 5:07 p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10085/#review18278
---
Commit ea86ce2328251537544a4409105a76c329ab09e7 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10088/#review18277
---
Commit ea86ce2328251537544a4409105a76c329ab09e7 in branch refs/heads
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:06:26AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "Chip Childers"
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Animesh
> >>
> >> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, "Chip Childers"
Hi Rajesh,
PFB the log.
2013-03-22 20:59:53,124 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-1:null) StorageCollector is running...
2013-03-22 20:59:53,132 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-1:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
storage host nfs://172.16.0.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10088/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Description
---
Fix
On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Animesh
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, "Chip Childers"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:03:49PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9908/#review18276
---
Ship it!
applied to all branches now. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 04:53:52PM +, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Think Wei already provided that. I applied it to master this morning. But it
> will be reqd for 4.1 as well.
I see it in the bug now. I just applied to 4.1.
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, "Chip Childers"
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:03:49PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >> 2. Add Cluster
> >> - Baremetal show up in list of hypervisors.
Think Wei already provided that. I applied it to master this morning. But it
will be reqd for 4.1 as well.
~P.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:31:09
To: Kishan Kavala
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi;
cloudstack-...@incubator
Thanks
Animesh
On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:03:49PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> 2. Add Cluster
>> - Baremetal show up in list of hypervisors. This is coming from
>> listHypervisors command
>>
>> How to fix: This comes from the file
In Cloudstack today a partial implementation for this feature already exists
i.e. admin can move a User VM between accounts under the same domain.
Hence as a first , proposing to add an enhancement to allow admin to move a VM
to another user under a different domain -
https://cwiki.apache.org/co
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:03:49PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> 2. Add Cluster
> - Baremetal show up in list of hypervisors. This is coming from
> listHypervisors command
>
> How to fix: This comes from the file server/src/com/cloud/configuration/
> Config.java in property " hypervisor.l
Vijay can provide the SQL patch too, it's ready just waiting on the community
decision on whether upgrade handling is necessary
Thanks
Animesh
On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:38 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 07:59:03PM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
>> Please note that the s
Hi,
Please find the logs at http://paste.cloudstack.org/KHPO/
Thanks.
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:58:35PM +0530, Kausal Malladi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am having problem adding host inside a cluster on Cl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10069/#review18274
---
Commit fc121c2b81433ffdf68c537633dc2d03f5ceb2c9 in branch refs/heads
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 07:59:03PM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
> Please note that the sql changes Animesh mentioned are not part of the diffs..
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
Anyone going to provide the SQL patch?
> Due to this thread, shall I safely assume that I should not commit any
> documentation for bare metal to the 4.1 branch? OK to move the fix target
> date forward for CLOUDSTACK-1478?
Yes. Please set to 4.2.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10069/#review18273
---
Commit c0d2c1b958e98460ec1fea7eb378d4ca4f35a052 in branch refs/heads
> On March 22, 2013, 3:27 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> > Ship It!
Hi Marcus - can you commit to master and then Chip + I will pull to 4.1 and 4.0
respectively. Thanks!
- Joe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10069/#review18271
---
Commit ff6177d119bb49e90fa325ca51f4eec217bae915 in branch refs/heads
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:56:27PM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> Chip,
> Can please you apply this patch to 4.1. It is pushed to 4.0 and master
> already.
Cherry picking this from 4.0 to master fails. We need a clean patch for
those branches please!
>
> Thanks,
> kishan
>
> > -Original M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10069/#review18270
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marcus Sorensen
On March 22, 2013, 3:07 p.m.
Yep - easy to fix. I'll take care of this.
--David
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone help to add "Automation" as the Component/s dropdown option. We
> need to log defects for test case fixes in automation env
> We could use Test option but automati
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:40:04AM +, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> Could you please add this in 4.1?
>
>
> Commit 01ea7232d9a7e956277f03c8471d8d4e2b60d699 in branch refs/heads/master
> from Prasanna Santhanam mailto:t...@apache.org>>
>
> [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudst
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 05:26:45PM -0700, Edison Su wrote:
> I'll create a patch for it.
>
Thank you Edison! I got it and applied it.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:19 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache
Hi,
Can someone help to add "Automation" as the Component/s dropdown option. We
need to log defects for test case fixes in automation env
We could use Test option but automation would be more appropriate.
Thanks
/Sudha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10047/#review18269
---
Ship it!
Applied to master:
commit c305e3c5a12cfc14dd87a615dfea260
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10007/#review18268
---
Commit c305e3c5a12cfc14dd87a615dfea260a4847be2f in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10046/#review18267
---
Commit c305e3c5a12cfc14dd87a615dfea260a4847be2f in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10047/#review18266
---
Commit c305e3c5a12cfc14dd87a615dfea260a4847be2f in branch refs/heads
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:45:48AM +, Likitha Shetty wrote:
> Already checked in master.
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1625. NPE with updateResourceCount when && is passed thru API.
> If any API contains '&' i.e. no key value pair or '&' i.e. a
> parameter without a value, then we get an NPE as
> owasp.esa
Vijay
Please fix and submit a new patch
Thanks
Animesh
On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:04 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/#review18264
>
Thanks Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 12:45 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sander Botman
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Nicira NVP
Hey Sudha,
We have covered most of the items on the list there already. At the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10072/#review18265
---
This is a pretty sizable patch. What bug is this for?
- Chip Child
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10072/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 3:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10069/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 3:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Marcus So
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/#review18264
---
This patch does not apply to 4.1 cleanly.
error: patch failed: serv
I removed all the files, resync the repo, and still get the same error.
Can it be related to my java version? I am using java 1.6.
On 2013-03-21 5:45 PM, Min Chen wrote:
The command should be
mvn clean install -P awsapi,systemvm -Dnonoss
I am not sure if you can use systemvm under -D.
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:39:03AM -0400, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:01:49AM -0500, prasanna wrote:
> > On 8 March 2013 22:24, Alex Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm going to start off a branch specifically to do BVT on
> > > simulator and devCloud so that we can at least ha
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:58:35PM +0530, Kausal Malladi wrote:
> Hi,
> I am having problem adding host inside a cluster on CloudStack.
> Basically I am doing this:
>
> DevCloud (IP: 172.16.0.1) on virtualbox adapter with IP 172.16.0.2 and
> netmask /16.
> I am able to ping my host machine from De
Can you please post the error log .
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
> -Original Message-
> From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 7:59 PM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Problem adding Host inside a Cluster
>
> Hi,
> I am having problem
Hi,
I am having problem adding host inside a cluster on CloudStack.
Basically I am doing this:
DevCloud (IP: 172.16.0.1) on virtualbox adapter with IP 172.16.0.2 and
netmask /16.
I am able to ping my host machine from DevCloud. Connection between my
host machine and DevCloud is fine
But while con
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati <
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Please note that the sql changes Animesh mentioned are not part of the
> diffs..
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@c
Hi Vladimir,
Depending on Edison's response to my previous question (about confirming
that our storage plug-ins will need to not only create a volume on our SAN,
but also hook it up to the hypervisor in question), you and I should
coordinate our development activities because we will both need to
>From the log:
=
There is no enough capacity for the hosts in the zone for the console proxy to
create and start so its failing.
"com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; i
Got it.
Thank you!
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:44 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Gavin Lee wrote:
>> Hi, David & Alex
>> Will be there a mailing list as a replacement for cloudstack-cn-users?
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Gavin:
>
> There will be, I sent a separate message there
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10085/#review18263
---
Commit 8a18b7f23e416b277d7a60c7125ddec69316eb8e in branch refs/heads
Thanks Kishan for your response. I would think the default should be deny
all. But if the users want to change the rules to make it permit-all with
a few deny rules before that, we should allow them to change that.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 3/21/13 10:24 PM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote:
>Please find
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
