---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10903/#review20179
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On May 2, 2013, 11:30 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10861/#review20178
---
This looks fine but I'm unable to apply your patch onto master. Can
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/#review20177
---
Does this also fix CLOUDSTACK-1309?
- Prasanna Santhanam
On April
>From command.properties.in resizeVolume has permission value 15. So it can be
>used by all the users.
If UI is not showing then it might be a bug from UI side.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 10:47 AM
> To: dev@cloud
On #1, looking through the API, I don't really see any 'update' or
other calls besides create-type calls that provide account or and
domainid parameters. Calls that act upon existing resources don't seem
to provide these parameters.
On #2, this may be an oversight on the UI additions. The API
perm
Hi,
This is regarding Resize Volume API. Is this allowed to ROOT Admin only?
My observations :
1. API does not have parameters as account/domain ID. @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Resize+Data+Volumes
2. UI- Resize option for data volumes is enabled only
> On May 6, 2013, 5:15 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > Ship It!
A committer should pick this up and apply the changes.
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10901/#review20
Thanks Wido, I got your point, and I'll try RBD solution later.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 04/28/2013 10:39 AM, Guangjian Liu wrote:
>
>> I have question about Use Ceph by Primary storage SharedMountPoint in
>> Cloudstack.
>>
>>
> The CephFS POSIX
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10901/#review20175
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On May 3, 2013, 11:30 a.m., Sa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9539/
---
(Updated May 6, 2013, 5:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prate
Hi all,
Taking vacation on Monday and Tuesday this week, so I'll be mostly
offline these days. Also flying on Wednesday, but should be back online
for most of the day.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
+1 for this, currently VMsync/HA/external state change have conflicts
occasionally, serializing VM operations can solve concurrency related issues.
So fullsync and deltasync will be deprecated and a new unified sync framework
will be introduced?
-Mice
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yan
Congrats, Isaac!
-Mice
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 8:54 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Isaac
Chiang to be
Hi all,
I am facing below error while upraded cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2.
any suggesiotn for this issue.
INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Grabbing lock to
check for database upgrade.
INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) DB version =
3.0.2.20120506223416
Hi,
db scheme from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 is not available.
schema-302to40.sql
so how can we upgrade cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 any ideas?
Regards,
Prakash.M
Hi,
db scheme from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 is not available.
schema-302to40.sql
so how can we upgrade cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 any ideas?
Regards,
Prakash.M
> Hi all,
>
>I am facing below error while upraded cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2.
> any suggesiotn for this issue.
>
> INFO [clou
Hi,
Np i have fixed this issue. i have manually restore the scheme for 4.0.
NOTE:no separate scheme for 4.0.2
Regards,
Prakash.M
> Hi,
>
>
> db scheme from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 is not available.
>
> schema-302to40.sql
>
> so how can we upgrade cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 any ideas?
>
> Rega
Hi,
Np i have fixed this issue. i have manually restore the scheme for 4.0.
NOTE:no separate scheme for 4.0.2
> Hi all,
>
>I am facing below error while upraded cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2.
> any suggesiotn for this issue.
>
> INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Grabb
Well deserved...
Congratz Isaac
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 6:24 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Isaac
Chi
Congrats Isaac!
You really did well on bug fixing/UI/translation, etc.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Isaac
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday
Follow this document -
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/how-to-build-on-master-branch.html to set
up maven in order to build the cloudstack repo.
Thanks,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: MEHDI ALI SOLTANI [mailto:mehdi_alisolt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 12:21 PM
To: d
21 matches
Mail list logo
