RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

2013-05-15 Thread Musayev, Ilya
+1, perhaps I'm late to this thread, but this makes lot of sense. Original message From: Pranav Saxena pranav.sax...@citrix.com Date: To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org,aemne...@gmail.com Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases? +1 to what Ahmad says here .

Re: [DISCUSS] include vhd-util in system vm template?

2013-05-15 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:47 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] include vhd-util in system vm template? On

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-962) CloudStack usage server didn't store data to cloud_usage in correct time

2013-05-15 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8971/#review20634 --- Commit 3fa8fda37c8b9fac1e38b57d28d23917106fe02b in branch

Re: Review Request: additional patch for CLOUDSTACK-962

2013-05-15 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11181/#review20635 --- Commit 3fa8fda37c8b9fac1e38b57d28d23917106fe02b in branch

Re: wrong validation in Netscaler Element while applyLBRules

2013-05-15 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
When you do merges (and not rebases) your bisect and blame also conk out. http://mettadore.com/analysis/a-simple-git-rebase-workflow-explained/ On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:39:11AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: Fixed this particular problem to unblock the QA and dev. It should have been if

Re: [MERGE] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via ServiceOffering

2013-05-15 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
If possible can you change the test to not use the API commands directly? I changed the affinity_groups test when that merge happened to make it use Resources as primary entities and not call API commands directly. I'm trying to switch marvin to use the Resource based approach [1] over API

<    1   2