Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

wooohooo! Awesome work Sangeetha!!! On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:19 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > S

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review21039 --- About listDedicated* API's: 1) The response should include a count o

Re: devcloud compatible with latest 4.2?

How did you increase the memory? It's actually a bit tricky with Xen, as the kernel splits out what's available to the VM guests vs the dom0 host early on. Increasing the RAM for the devcloud guest will just leave more memory for VMs to run in, not create more memory for devcloud itself to run appl

RE: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:54 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master > > On May 24, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> Fr

devcloud compatible with latest 4.2?

Hi, I'm attempting to use the devcloud appliance referenced from the following: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud with latest 4.2 code. Everything works great up until the point of spinning up the system VM's at which time I'm getting: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixR

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On May 24, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:42 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master >> >> On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chatur

RE: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:42 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master > > On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> Fr

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:18 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master >> >> On Thu, May 23, 20

RE: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:18 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:50:49PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>]

Re: Update on Hyper-V plugin work

Donal, First, thank you for sending this out! It seems like really good progress. Who are you working with on this? Are you running solo? The technical elements of this seem sound at first review. The licensing implications are going to take some time to parse through though. One of the thin

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:50:49PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] IMHO the goal behind bringing architectural changes early in > release is to ensure stability and proper review and that makes sense. In > this case the goals are being addressed with testing on feature branch and

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

> On May 24, 2013, 4:31 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: > > engine/schema/src/com/cloud/host/dao/HostDaoImpl.java, line 223 > > > > > > current code is searching with "pod" and it is replacing with "podId" > > make sure t

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/ --- (Updated May 24, 2013, 7:30 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: 4.1 install stuck at requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: HTTPConnectionPool

Is the management server running and listening on '127.0.0.1', port=8096 On 5/24/13 11:13 AM, "Wes Leung" wrote: >Trying to install 4.1 rc1 release on a ubuntu 12.04 server >I ran the below and I'm stuck at the below error > >Can you please help >Thank >Wes > >git clone https://git-wip-us.apach

build failures on master (jenkins.cloudstack.org)

According to this: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master/401/consoleFull, WARN execute, Exception: /bin/bash -c /sbin/route | grep default java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "/bin/bash": java.io.IOException: error=12, Cannot allocate memory at java.lang.ProcessBuilder

4.1 install stuck at requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: HTTPConnectionPool

Trying to install 4.1 rc1 release on a ubuntu 12.04 server I ran the below and I'm stuck at the below error Can you please help Thank Wes git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git sudo apt-get install maven mvn -P systemvm clean install mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21015 --- Commit 09d2fe6a7ddc208f77edf931ed3d57b0afcc2055 in branch refs/head

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1 Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/a

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou

Congratulations Wei > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:23 PM > To: > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Wei Zhou to become a c

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

Congratulations Sailaja > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:21 PM > To: > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Sailaja Mada t

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

Congratualtions Venkata > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:22 PM > To: > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Venkata Swamy

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:19 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Sangeetha H

Re: Update on Hyper-V plugin work

+1. Would like an update on the possibility of using Mono to *build* it so it can be on jenkins. On 5/23/13 7:22 PM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote: >Reproduced from >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Progress > >Apologies for the length - skip to the heading that interests you.

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review21000 --- client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:41:30AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what > does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each > major feature release? > > This might fall in line with some of the stated concerns abo

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:51:56PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > +1, we would need to add this bug to "known issues" Done

Re: marvin tests via IntelliJ

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:36:39AM -0400, Shane Witbeck wrote: > I'm an avid user of IntelliJ and would like to use it (with the > Python plugin) to write and run marvin tests instead of > pydev+eclipse as documented here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testin

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:49:12AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ? Corrected in 4.1 branch: commit c559c40c3178873177b9f46c46e6c60b5598f2eb Author: Chip Childers Date: Fri May 24 17:06:02 2013 +0100 CLOUDSTACK-528: Adding a correc

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21002 --- Commit 09d2fe6a7ddc208f77edf931ed3d57b0afcc2055 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21001 --- Commit c559c40c3178873177b9f46c46e6c60b5598f2eb in branch refs/heads

Re: Convention on UUID column

+1 on enforcing it through db constraints. Create a JIRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2676 to track this issue. Thanks -min On 5/24/13 6:20 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >+1 on adding the constraints. Just make sure you add them after >upgrading the data. > >Populating wit

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]CLOUDSTACK-2656

Thanks. -min On 5/24/13 8:26 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:21:44PM +, Min Chen wrote: >> Hi Chip, >> Can you please cherry-pick the following commit from master to 4.1? >> This is to address empty UUID columns for pre-4.1 schema entities. We >> missed two "snap

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congratulations, Sangeetha. Well deserved. -min On 5/23/13 11:18 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Sangeetha Hariharan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce >that they have accepted. > >Being a committer allows many

marvin tests via IntelliJ

I'm an avid user of IntelliJ and would like to use it (with the Python plugin) to write and run marvin tests instead of pydev+eclipse as documented here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python#Marvin-TestingwithPython-IDEEclipseandPyDev Is anyone suc

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding items

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:52:11PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Chip > > I'm hoping to retry the setup today and will update tonight. (Still waiting > for network team to punch firewall.) If nothing comes thru today, I don't > want to hold up the ACS41 release - since Mice was not able to repr

Re: Nicira NVP + CloudStack 4.1

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:02:22PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > I've updated the documentation. > > Chip, can you pull commit 1201d623a7091517a1e26bc4b82c5daeea3c155f into 4.1? > It's just doc updates. > > The Jenkins build is here > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-docs-n

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:35:11PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > Chip, please cherry-pick to 4.1 > > CLOUDSTACK-2587: netscaler_pod_ref DB upgrade is missing from 3.0.2 to 4.x > > added missing schema as part of 4.0 to 4.1 upgrade > > Branch: refs/heads/master > Commit: 623a26e469ca7354a7dbe6b895

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]CLOUDSTACK-2656

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:21:44PM +, Min Chen wrote: > Hi Chip, > Can you please cherry-pick the following commit from master to 4.1? > This is to address empty UUID columns for pre-4.1 schema entities. We > missed two "snapshot_policy" and "dc_storage_network_ip_range". > > commit a46b

Review Request: Patch 2: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prachi Damle. Description

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prachi Damle. Description

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congrats Sangeetha :) > -Original Message- > From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:49 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan > > Well deserved, Congrats Sangeetha! > > R

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-41 #331

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > /me makes a mental note, more beer for Chip at CCC Unlikely to hear a complaint from me on that front...

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-41 #331

/me makes a mental note, more beer for Chip at CCC > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 7:33 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-41 #331 > > Fixed the Nicira file

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

It would indeed, but since we are not going to release a 4.0.3, I fixed it in the 4.1 and master branches. At a minimum, this "fix" doesn't regress anything... so while I'm surprised that we didn't run into this issue as reported, I don't see that it's an issue to correct the syntax moving forwar

Re: Review Request: fixed vpc private gateway args to script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11372/#review20995 --- Ship it! d8f5f2ea10eca540c10e93469fd5307fe25f0959 - Murali Reddy

RE: Convention on UUID column

+1 on adding the constraints. Just make sure you add them after upgrading the data. Populating with id in the upgrade prevents exactly the problem you've described. That's why we're doing it. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thu

Review Request: fixed vpc private gateway args to script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11372/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Murali Reddy, and Koushik Das

Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2672: Adding isVolatile parameter in service offering response object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Description --- Missing isV

RE: Nicira NVP + CloudStack 4.1

I've updated the documentation. Chip, can you pull commit 1201d623a7091517a1e26bc4b82c5daeea3c155f into 4.1? It's just doc updates. The Jenkins build is here http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-docs-niciranvp-master/ (And this time I did do the rat check ;-) ) Hugo > -O

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1453: support restore for VM created from ISO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779/#review20991 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On May 24, 2013, 10:19 a.m., Hari

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1453: support restore for VM created from ISO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779/#review20990 --- Commit a34e577d1be5a25d7eb884147212ab51786b55e2 in branch refs/heads/

Regarding the RPS and RFS support in the virtual router.

Hi All, I have enabled the RPS and RFS support in the router vm and performed some tests, but cloud not see any improvements. If any one know about RPS (receive packet steering ) and RFS (receive flow steering ) please comment. I am not sure if the RPS and RFS is working. The router has 4 co

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congratulations! From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 11:56 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sangee

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1453: support restore for VM created from ISO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779/ --- (Updated May 24, 2013, 10:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta an

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ? On 13/05/13 9:22 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >--- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20489 >---

Re: Convention on UUID column

Agreed with Koushik. Now that the UUId is going to be populated for every table lets keep it as not null else we will keep running into these issues. Also whats the reason for populating the UUID column with ID ? Is it for clients who have hardcoded values for system vms, service offerings etc. or

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-2548 [Automation] Failed to delete public IP range

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11297/#review20987 --- Ship it! 47a562a - Prasanna Santhanam On May 22, 2013, 6:25 a.m.

Review Request: Config value has to be encrypted for Hidden category configs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11369/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- As part o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congrats Sangeetha :) On 24/05/13 1:04 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >Congratulations Sangeetha!! > >-Original Message- >From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:22 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sange

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congratulations Sangeetha!! -Original Message- From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan Congratulations Sangeetha! > -Original Message- >

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congratulations Sangeetha! > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 11:49 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Well deserved, Congrats Sangeetha! Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 11:50 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan > > The Project Management Committee (

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

> > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > > Venkata Swamy to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > > that they have accepted. > > > > Please join me in congratulating Venkata! Congrats Swamy!!

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20984 --- Commit 3e02a76f001b14ad25e5fdc55efc137457e5e52b in branch refs/heads