Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

It means some conflicts between the source branch and destination branch. You need to fix them manually. It is normal in version control systems (git,svn)

Re: deployVm with data disk

Well, we can wait and see if anyone disagrees that it's a bug. Maybe if no one does by end of day tomorrow I can log a bug for it. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Sure, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't expected first. I thought > perhaps the service offering was sup

Re: Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/ --- (Updated Jan. 10, 2014, 6:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kav

Re: deployVm with data disk

Sure, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't expected first. I thought perhaps the service offering was supposed to trump all in the case of deploy. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Would you like me to open a bug, Marcus, and use your example or were you > planning on doing

Re: Review Request 16560: CLOUDSTACK-5711 allow scaling from the same offering when using custom compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16560/ --- (Updated Jan. 10, 2014, 6:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Re: deployVm with data disk

Would you like me to open a bug, Marcus, and use your example or were you planning on doing so? Thanks On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Now I remember why I didn't log the bug...I wanted to repro it to > understand the sequence in more det

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

I had to cherry-pick 10 4.3 changes of mine into master today, so I was noticing a lot of nice auto merges, but then a lot of silly manual-intervention-required merges. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Yeah, I guess what I'm wondering about

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

Yeah, I guess what I'm wondering about is just why some very complex changes get auto merged perfectly, but then silly issues like I added a line in between two statements don't. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Master recently underwent all of the styling changes (delet

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

Master recently underwent all of the styling changes (deleting whitespace, etc), and as such there's a lot that doesn't merge cleanly via cherry-pick between 4.4 and 4.3. I'm not sure if that's what you're referring to. The output shows you the conflict, one version and the other, split by the

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

In other words, I'm wondering why this kind of change doesn't just get auto merged. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I often seem to get weird diff output like the following: > > <<< HEAD > > === > > > >>> ecd4a9c... CLO

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay! -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] Sent: 10 January 2014 11:08 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi Congrats Sanjay !! -Original Message- From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:l

Re: deployVm with data disk

Now I remember why I didn't log the bug...I wanted to repro it to understand the sequence in more detail. Sounds like you have it nailed down, though (you have reproduced this and understand when it doesn't work). On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wr

Weird Diffs Sometimes

Hi, I often seem to get weird diff output like the following: <<< HEAD === >>> ecd4a9c... CLOUDSTACK-5823: Taking a VMware snapshot doesn't work Does anyone know why Git doesn't understand here that I just added a new line in the more recent version of the file? Thanks! -- *M

Re: Review Request 16729: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16729/ --- (Updated Jan. 10, 2014, 5:55 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: deployVm with data disk

Now that you mention it, I think CS does get confused about this. I may have seen this last week. The way it works (depending on if you're using an ISO or a template), CS acts in a non-intuitive way. In one case (I can't remember if this is for ISOs or templates), you pick a Compute Offering and a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #430

later devlist this is BS On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:18 PM, wrote: > See > > -- > [...truncated 672 lines...] > Receiving objects: 89% (414381/461522), 287.56 MiB | 897 KiB/s > Receiving ob

Re: deployVm with data disk

*allocates the root disk* On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > To clarify, deploying service offering 'foo' and then > creating/attaching a disk offering 'bar' afterward works fine, but if > we try to deploy together, it doesn't interrogate any storage pools > for capacity on

Re: deployVm with data disk

To clarify, deploying service offering 'foo' and then creating/attaching a disk offering 'bar' afterward works fine, but if we try to deploy together, it doesn't interrogate any storage pools for capacity on the data disk deploy. The behavior is as if the code asks for all storage pools matching 'f

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Sanjay, congratulations :) >-Original Message- >From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:23 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Sa

Re: deployVm with data disk

In addition, do check if there are at least 1 PS for each of the tags in the same cluster. Pasting the snippet of logs with failure would help. (But do paste the entire snippet for vm deployment) On 09/01/14 8:14 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Are you saying there was no primary storage tagged "

Re: deployVm with data disk

No, we have two primary storages, one tagged "foo", one tagged "bar". We have two disk offerings implementing these. We can verify that data disks deploy properly to both. Then we have a service offering with storage tag "foo". We can deploy a VM with a data disk tagged "foo" but not one named "bar

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay! On 10-Jan-2014, at 4:23 AM, David Nalley wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that they have > accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contrib

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay !! -Original Message- From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:48 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi Sanjay, congratulations :) >-Original Message- >From: David

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Hearty Congratulations, Sanjay! Well deserved. Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: 10 January 2014 04:23 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) f

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congratulations Sanjay. Best Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 10 January 2014 04:23 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has ask

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #430

See -- [...truncated 672 lines...] Receiving objects: 89% (414381/461522), 287.56 MiB | 897 KiB/s Receiving objects: 89% (414381/461522), 288.25 MiB | 845 KiB/s Receiving objects: 89% (414381/46

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Sanjay, party. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjay Tripathi

Re: deployVm with data disk

Are you saying there was no primary storage tagged "bar"? If that is the case, I guess I would expect the deployment of the VM to fail because not all of the criteria could be met. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Is this a bug (perhaps fixed), or expected behavior? > >

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Yeah, I had white space replaced in my text editor, but still could not see the issue. Strange. I just ended up replacing the method with a copy from the 4.4 code base and then putting in my changes manually. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > It might be easier to spot if you

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #429

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522), 197.57 MiB | 586 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522), 198.36 MiB | 645 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #428

See -- [...truncated 576 lines...] Receiving objects: 78% (360198/461522), 191.00 MiB | 581 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (360206/461522), 191.50 MiB | 550 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (360206/46

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.2 #47

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #427

See -- [...truncated 576 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367806/461522), 202.34 MiB | 560 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367806/461522), 202.85 MiB | 548 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367806/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #426

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350808/461522), 178.75 MiB | 274 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350809/461522), 179.11 MiB | 267 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350809/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #46

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350936/461522), 177.43 MiB | 232 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350937/461522), 177.70 MiB | 239 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350937/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #425

See -- [...truncated 570 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (355372/461522), 181.47 MiB | 528 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358186/461522), 181.91 MiB | 504 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358554/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #45

See -- [...truncated 575 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 211.37 MiB | 510 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 211.74 MiB | 553 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522

RE: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

It might be easier to spot if you turn on white space characters in eclipse. I suspect it's an eol problem but am not sure and definitely very difficult to see from the email. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, Jan

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #424

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (368268/461522), 240.95 MiB | 517 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (368268/461522), 241.42 MiB | 419 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (368268/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #44

See -- [...truncated 643 lines...] Receiving objects: 87% (402224/461522), 281.25 MiB | 765 KiB/s Receiving objects: 87% (406080/461522), 281.92 MiB | 689 KiB/s Receiving objects: 88% (406140/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #423

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367732/461522), 205.04 MiB | 576 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367732/461522), 205.59 MiB | 588 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367732/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #43

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 78% (360198/461522), 190.68 MiB | 471 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (360199/461522), 191.03 MiB | 504 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (360206/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #422

See -- [...truncated 579 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358560/461522), 183.50 MiB | 632 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358562/461522), 184.24 MiB | 683 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358563/46

RE: Hyper-V agent

Hi Paul, I had a quick look at the log, found that url for the localstorage is wrongly appended. Can you use SMB as primary store in the meanwhile. I will test this local storage and get back with result. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@sh

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #42

See -- [...truncated 571 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 194.66 MiB | 708 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 195.37 MiB | 723 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #421

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 207.68 MiB | 347 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 207.82 MiB | 348 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #41

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367803/461522), 204.58 MiB | 551 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367803/461522), 205.36 MiB | 525 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367803/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #420

See -- [...truncated 570 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350820/461522), 169.65 MiB | 508 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350820/461522), 169.88 MiB | 456 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350821/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #40

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367807/461522), 201.43 MiB | 467 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367807/461522), 201.85 MiB | 455 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367807/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #419

See -- [...truncated 584 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 201.08 MiB | 322 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 201.57 MiB | 359 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #39

See -- [...truncated 576 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522), 219.99 MiB | 452 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522), 220.69 MiB | 477 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjay Tripathi to

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay. -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 6:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi Good work Sanjay! On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #418

See -- [...truncated 571 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358563/461522), 183.63 MiB | 417 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358565/461522), 184.24 MiB | 480 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358565/46

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Good work Sanjay! On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Well Done Sanjay :) > > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:23 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi >

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #38

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350876/461522), 163.40 MiB | 606 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350877/461522), 163.92 MiB | 580 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350879/461522

deployVm with data disk

Is this a bug (perhaps fixed), or expected behavior? If I create a service offering with storage tag=foo, and a disk offering with storage tag=bar, I cannot provide this disk offering as a data disk to deploy along with this service offering. The root volume gets allocated, and then the data disk

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Well Done Sanjay :) -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjay Tripathi

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #417

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350878/461522), 179.26 MiB | 220 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350879/461522), 179.46 MiB | 249 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350883/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #37

See -- [...truncated 571 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 202.11 MiB | 689 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 202.94 MiB | 743 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #416

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358576/461522), 186.79 MiB | 417 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358576/461522), 187.43 MiB | 483 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358576/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #36

See -- [...truncated 575 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 199.14 MiB | 516 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522), 199.78 MiB | 528 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367809/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #313

See -- Started by upstream project "cloudstack-4.3-maven-build" build number 340 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #415

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 78% (360960/461522), 192.63 MiB | 590 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (362272/461522), 193.03 MiB | 555 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (364025/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #35

See -- [...truncated 575 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522), 200.75 MiB | 772 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522), 201.30 MiB | 737 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367810/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #414

See -- [...truncated 574 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358576/461522), 185.62 MiB | 547 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358576/461522), 186.04 MiB | 429 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358576/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #34

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358901/461522), 189.13 MiB | 588 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (359882/461522), 189.76 MiB | 542 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (359988/461522

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #413

See -- [...truncated 576 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367048/461504), 207.88 MiB | 269 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367048/461504), 208.31 MiB | 291 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367048/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #33

See -- [...truncated 580 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367046/461504), 202.40 MiB | 786 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367046/461504), 202.77 MiB | 793 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367046/461504

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #412

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350422/461504), 147.54 MiB | 304 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350424/461504), 147.93 MiB | 303 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350426/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #32

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (359371/461504), 190.15 MiB | 398 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (359371/461504), 190.41 MiB | 346 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (359371/461504

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #411

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 78% (362647/461504), 192.95 MiB | 614 KiB/s Receiving objects: 78% (364050/461504), 193.36 MiB | 573 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (364589/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #31

See -- [...truncated 576 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367048/461504), 195.87 MiB | 291 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367048/461504), 196.35 MiB | 356 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367048/461504

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #410

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351114/461342), 180.13 MiB | 500 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (354071/461342), 180.84 MiB | 563 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (355234/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #30

See -- [...truncated 573 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (364461/461342), 193.57 MiB | 446 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366158/461342), 193.79 MiB | 434 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366884/461342

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #409

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350654/461342), 160.78 MiB | 587 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350657/461342), 161.32 MiB | 576 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350659/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #29

See -- [...truncated 546 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350546/461342), 155.38 MiB | 539 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350552/461342), 156.07 MiB | 596 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350558/461342

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #312

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350459/461342), 152.60 MiB | 435 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350463/461342), 153.11 MiB | 417 KiB/s Receiving

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #408

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (357606/461306), 185.68 MiB | 294 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (357606/461306), 186.14 MiB | 353 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (357606/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #407

See -- [...truncated 575 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (366761/461301), 196.21 MiB | 473 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366761/461301), 196.87 MiB | 534 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366761/46

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #406

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-a99 in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #405

See -- [...truncated 587 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (366822/461301), 207.04 MiB | 340 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366822/461301), 207.54 MiB | 388 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366822/46

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-5502) [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Daan, Please review Marcus's comment we should continue with the old behavior. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 1:30 PM To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Commented]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #404

See -- [...truncated 566 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350653/461301), 172.28 MiB | 433 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350657/461301), 172.62 MiB | 431 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350660/46

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #311

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (364428/461301), 193.45 MiB | 1.27 MiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (366737/461301), 194.87 MiB | 1.32 MiB/s Receivin

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Worst case, I should just be able to copy/paste from what's already in master, but I was curious about the error message itself. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > This method was just brought in by git during the merge. > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

This method was just brought in by git during the merge. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Any thoughts on this checkstyle issue? > > [INFO] Starting audit... > /Users/mtutkowski/Documents/CloudStack/src/CloudStack/vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HostMO.java

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #403

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350649/461301), 173.41 MiB | 665 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350651/461301), 173.89 MiB | 649 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350654/46

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Any thoughts on this checkstyle issue? [INFO] Starting audit... /Users/mtutkowski/Documents/CloudStack/src/CloudStack/vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HostMO.java:712:9: Got an exception - expecting EOF, found 'ObjectContent' Audit done. Everything looks OK in the method in question

Re: netapp plugin

Mike - thanks for pointing Victor to our video. Victor - I’m not sure that everyone on the dev list wants to see this whole conversation, so feel free to contact David (cc’d) and I off list and we can talk more in depth. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Dat

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #402

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (357575/461283), 188.74 MiB | 396 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (357869/461283), 188.88 MiB | 384 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358317/46

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #310

See -- [...truncated 558 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350590/461267), 163.00 MiB | 500 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350592/461267), 163.61 MiB | 546 KiB/s Receiving

Re: netapp plugin

This might help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI8xIV38Oiw On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote: > Hello, > > What's Netapp storage plugin doing? > > Thanks, > Victor Rodionov > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.c

netapp plugin

Hello, What's Netapp storage plugin doing? Thanks, Victor Rodionov

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #401

See -- [...truncated 567 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350458/461267), 171.21 MiB | 283 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350458/461267), 171.72 MiB | 289 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350460/46

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #337

See

Re: Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/ --- (Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 11:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhan

Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay.. :) On 09/01/14 3:06 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Sanjay, congratulations! > >On 1/9/14, 2:53 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >>Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce >>that th

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #400

See -- [...truncated 586 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350608/461267), 168.86 MiB | 355 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350610/461267), 169.40 MiB | 421 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350611/46

  1   2   >