Re: Resource counts

2014-04-17 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
Thanks Ilya. I have filed an improvement bug for this - CLOUDSTACK-6446 Regards, Gaurav On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:03 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > It appears the size is kept in bytes but end-user representation is done > in GB. > > Should be

Re: [QUESTION, SSVM] Updating code in SSVM

2014-04-17 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks :) What way do you recommend I remove systemvm.iso from secondary storage? It doesn't show up under ISOs in the GUI. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: > > The procedure mentioned by among will work+ please make sure that you > stop and start the system vms after mo

Re: Review Request 16523: Unit tests for Juniper contrail VM Interface Model and Instance Ip Model class.

2014-04-17 Thread Sachchidanand Vaidya
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16523/ --- (Updated April 17, 2014, 11:16 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes -

RE: [QUESTION, SSVM] Updating code in SSVM

2014-04-17 Thread Suresh Sadhu
The procedure mentioned by among will work+ please make sure that you stop and start the system vms after moving the old system vm from secondary storage . And in case of xen. Clear the host tags on xen host and perform force reconnect form CS,new systemvm.iso will be pushed to xen host. R

Re: [QUESTION, SSVM] Updating code in SSVM

2014-04-17 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Sorry...I should have mentioned this is 4.4. So, in this case, SSVM is actually running on XenServer; however, the user VM that is the beneficiary of the CopyCommand is running on VMware. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Amogh Vasekar wrote: > Hi, > > Which CloudStack version is it? > AFAIK fo

Re: [QUESTION, SSVM] Updating code in SSVM

2014-04-17 Thread Amogh Vasekar
Hi, Which CloudStack version is it? AFAIK for vmware - deleting systemvm.iso from the secondary storage for your VMWare zone, and restarting management server and SSVM should do the trick. Thanks, Amogh On 4/17/14 10:55 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi, > >I was debugging storage code for ESXi

Re: [QUESTION, SSVM] Updating code in SSVM

2014-04-17 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Oh, I should mention that I also tried destroying SSVM and using a new one. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was debugging storage code for ESXi that runs in SSVM (a CopyCommand). > > I needed to make a change related to managed

[QUESTION, SSVM] Updating code in SSVM

2014-04-17 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, I was debugging storage code for ESXi that runs in SSVM (a CopyCommand). I needed to make a change related to managed storage. I made the change, rebuilt the codebase, and have been trying various ways of getting that code into SSVM, but SSVM seems to have the older code still. In this situ

Re: Review Request 20466: Distinguish between user defined and system defined guest OS

2014-04-17 Thread Nitin Mehta
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20466/#review40743 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On April 17, 2014, 9:40 p.m., Am

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #630

2014-04-17 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [min.chen] Handle listAll flag in IAM buildAclSearchParameters. [min.chen] Fix RoleBasedQuerySelector to handle new listAll semantics. If [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-6350: IAM - Listing of VM using uuid when owner ac

Re: Review Request 20443: Integrate Deploy DB Into windows msi installer

2014-04-17 Thread Damodar Reddy Talakanti
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20443/ --- (Updated April 18, 2014, 4:48 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: login API with MD5 is not working

2014-04-17 Thread Tejas Gadaria
Thanks Demetrius! On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Demetrius Tsitrelis < demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com> wrote: > Some authenticators such as LDAP need clear text passwords. > > -Original Message- > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:3

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #643

2014-04-17 Thread jenkins
See

Re: java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

2014-04-17 Thread David Nalley
I think, but am not sure; that this is because openjdk has an epoch in addition to version. This would mean that version '>= 1.7.0' is satisfied by version 1:1.6.0 See: http://erikos.buchoase.de/2009/01/26/rpm-epoch-field/ Please see if changing the requires to 'java >= 1:1.70', if that works, pl

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #642

2014-04-17 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [min.chen] Changes while processing the @ACL annotation, to include only 1 object per parameter even if the parameter is tied to multiple interfaces in the @EntityReference [min.chen] All BaseAsyncCreateCmd commands wil

Anybody experienced test failure on master?

2014-04-17 Thread Min Chen
Hi there, Did anybody experience test failure on master branch? I got this: T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (com.cloud.utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker). log4j:WARN Plea

Review Request 20466: Distinguish between user defined and system defined guest OS

2014-04-17 Thread Amogh Vasekar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20466/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6437 https:

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
Sorry, that was a *thumbsup*, but I forgot that the list doesn't like HTML On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 17.04.2014 22:19, Marcus wrote: > >> [?] >> > > Thanks for implementing this for KVM that is. :) > > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! >

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Nux!
On 17.04.2014 22:19, Marcus wrote: [?] Thanks for implementing this for KVM that is. :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
[?] On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 17.04.2014 19:37, Marcus wrote: > >> Probably not, since I implemented the KVM change out of necessity. I >> mentioned it on-list, but there's not a lot of formal synchronization >> between the hypervisors for small tweaks like that. If it g

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Nux!
On 17.04.2014 19:37, Marcus wrote: Probably not, since I implemented the KVM change out of necessity. I mentioned it on-list, but there's not a lot of formal synchronization between the hypervisors for small tweaks like that. If it goes into the service offering that would prompt everyone to look

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

2014-04-17 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/#review40690 --- 1) Alex, I don't quite approve the fact that the responses were modi

Re: java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

2014-04-17 Thread Yoshikazu Nojima
Ilya, No, I tried on cleam environment again. This is a result: Any java wasn't installed before installing cloudstack rpm. [root@ut1-esxi-vm37 ~]# rpm -qa | grep java [root@ut1-esxi-vm37 ~]# * dependency list Even though "dependency: java >= 1.7.0" is specified, java-1.6.0-openjdk is listed as a

Re: Review Request 19686: Implementation of the issue CLOUDSTACK 6139 - System.vm.use.local.storage global setting to zone setting

2014-04-17 Thread daan Hoogland
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19686/#review40680 --- Ship it! b3f18e7d74a0f09db9977554a6c7648b7edbc33d - daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 19686: Implementation of the issue CLOUDSTACK 6139 - System.vm.use.local.storage global setting to zone setting

2014-04-17 Thread daan Hoogland
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19686/#review40679 --- Ship it! b3f18e7d74a0f09db9977554a6c7648b7edbc33d - daan Hoogland

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
Probably not, since I implemented the KVM change out of necessity. I mentioned it on-list, but there's not a lot of formal synchronization between the hypervisors for small tweaks like that. If it goes into the service offering that would prompt everyone to look at supporting it, I think. If you wo

RE: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread mphilli7823
Would seem to be an easy to do... Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Marcus Date:04/17/2014 1:09 PM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS cores vs sockets Or like you mention, service offerings could have

RE: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread mphilli7823
I'm still on 4.2.1, I wonder if the same changes were made with vmware on 4.3 up... Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Marcus Date:04/17/2014 1:07 PM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS cores vs sockets

Re: Review Request 19686: Implementation of the issue CLOUDSTACK 6139 - System.vm.use.local.storage global setting to zone setting

2014-04-17 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19686/ --- (Updated April 17, 2014, 6:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hooglan

Re: Devcloud2 errors on 4.4

2014-04-17 Thread Amogh Vasekar
I see the same error. Not sure if its something related to the new XenServer jars. But I was seeing this since about a month, haven't been able to dig into it yet. Thanks, Amogh On 4/17/14 10:58 AM, "David Grizzanti" wrote: >Yeah, even after using the newer devcloud2 instance, I'm still not abl

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
Or like you mention, service offerings could have a 'cores per socket' setting. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcus wrote: > With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up). > It's a bit rudimentary, but we could expand it to work via config > options. Right now, if the

Re: Review Request 19686: Implementation of the issue CLOUDSTACK 6139 - System.vm.use.local.storage global setting to zone setting

2014-04-17 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19686/ --- (Updated April 17, 2014, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hooglan

Re: CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus
With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up). It's a bit rudimentary, but we could expand it to work via config options. Right now, if the number of cores is divisible by 4, it creates quad core sockets. If the number is divisible by 6, it creates hexacore sockets, with the

Re: Devcloud2 errors on 4.4

2014-04-17 Thread David Grizzanti
Yeah, even after using the newer devcloud2 instance, I'm still not able to get it to work. Still seeing errors for the directory and others. Amogh - what errors are you seeing? >From deploy marvin: cloudstackException.cloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd: addhost failed, due to: errorCode: 530, er

CS cores vs sockets

2014-04-17 Thread Michael Phillips
I think this issue may have been raised in the past, but was not addressed.. When creating a service offering in CS using multiple "cores" CS, actually creates the VM in the background with multiple sockets. Example a 6 "core" offering actually translates into a 6 socket offering. This is a probl

Re: Review Request 17335: cleanup around seemingly impossible cast

2014-04-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
will you add the license header then? On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17335/ > > On April 17th, 2014, 2:08 p.m. UTC, *daan Hoogland* wrote: > > Lazslo, you still want this revie

Re: Review Request 17335: cleanup around seemingly impossible cast

2014-04-17 Thread Laszlo Hornyak
> On April 17, 2014, 2:08 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Lazslo, you still want this reviewed/applied? Yes a review would be nice - Laszlo --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1733

Re: release note documentation

2014-04-17 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
at this point do we have to create a new [discuss] thread? I'm still not familiar with Apache process so I can start a new thread. I would also add few consideration. by using branches, let say we create a branch 4.3 for current CS version, this branch would be the default visible on RTD and we w

Re: Can we create IAM component in ACS JIRA?

2014-04-17 Thread Min Chen
Thanks, David. -min On 4/17/14 10:12 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >Done, enjoy! > >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Min Chen wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Can somebody with permission create a "IAM" component in ACS JIRA? This >>will help us to track issues filed specifically related to IAM feature. >

Re: Can we create IAM component in ACS JIRA?

2014-04-17 Thread David Nalley
Done, enjoy! On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Hi there, > > Can somebody with permission create a "IAM" component in ACS JIRA? This will > help us to track issues filed specifically related to IAM feature. > > Thanks > -min

Can we create IAM component in ACS JIRA?

2014-04-17 Thread Min Chen
Hi there, Can somebody with permission create a "IAM" component in ACS JIRA? This will help us to track issues filed specifically related to IAM feature. Thanks -min

RE: login API with MD5 is not working

2014-04-17 Thread Demetrius Tsitrelis
Some authenticators such as LDAP need clear text passwords. -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: login API with MD5 is not working Hi Demetrius, Thanks for explanation, I

Re: release note documentation

2014-04-17 Thread sebgoa
On Apr 17, 2014, at 5:57 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Are you shipping (e.g. making source available for download) tarballs > or merely producing documentation that we publish publicly. > If the answer to that is no; then we don't need votes or a formal > release process (anymore than we need votes

Re: release note documentation

2014-04-17 Thread David Nalley
Are you shipping (e.g. making source available for download) tarballs or merely producing documentation that we publish publicly. If the answer to that is no; then we don't need votes or a formal release process (anymore than we need votes for publishing content to cloudstack.apache.org --David O

Re: release note documentation

2014-04-17 Thread sebgoa
On Apr 17, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Should we have a page on wiki explaining how we would handle release-notes > on RTD ? and then vote on the method? > I'm not seeing other alternative to branches exept having one RTD project > for each release-notes. > I think your email he

REMINDER realhostip going away

2014-04-17 Thread John Kinsella
Reminder, folks - please migrate off realhostip.com or you’re going to get a nasty surprise this summer. More info at link below. https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/realhostip_service_is_being_retired

Re: Resource counts

2014-04-17 Thread ilya musayev
It appears the size is kept in bytes but end-user representation is done in GB. Should be an easy fix, please file enhacement request - and feel free to post a patch, open source projects flourish because of open contribution. On 4/15/14, 10:10 AM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: Hi all, The resour

Re: release note documentation

2014-04-17 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Should we have a page on wiki explaining how we would handle release-notes on RTD ? and then vote on the method? I'm not seeing other alternative to branches exept having one RTD project for each release-notes. Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 855-OK-CLO

Re: Review Request 20390: CLOUDSTACK-6202: Add signatureversion and expiring datetime to cloudmonkey, make it configurable

2014-04-17 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20390/#review40655 --- Committed a711367e4968ae1fca68e5293ad5e1622a269a37 - Rohit Yadav

Re: Review Request 20390: CLOUDSTACK-6202: Add signatureversion and expiring datetime to cloudmonkey, make it configurable

2014-04-17 Thread Rohit Yadav
> On April 16, 2014, 7:50 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > If it's backward compatible and works fine, let's merge. LGTM > > Yichi Lu wrote: > Rohit: > As far as I know this will not break the backward compatibility. For API > calls, the signature version and expiration time is consumed by

Re: Review Request 20390: CLOUDSTACK-6202: Add signatureversion and expiring datetime to cloudmonkey, make it configurable

2014-04-17 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20390/#review40653 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rohit Yadav On April 15, 2014, 10:28 p.m., Y

Re: java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

2014-04-17 Thread ilya musayev
Yoshi Any chance you had 1.7 installed and 1.6 came as side effect of something else? rpm -qa | grep java regards ilya On 4/16/14, 5:08 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: Hi, I found java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum comma

Re: Slideshare link to my presentation

2014-04-17 Thread ilya musayev
David Thanks for the great presentation and posting the slides, Regards ilya On 4/17/14, 9:18 AM, La Motta, David wrote: Hey everybody, for those of you who are interested, here is the link to my presentation from CCCNA14: http://www.slideshare.net/dlamotta/bringing-netapp-data-ontap-apache-c

RE: Best practice: Do not use innerHtml() property or it's equivalent jQuery .html() method

2014-04-17 Thread Brian Federle
Yes, though the ASF security team is responsible for committing and reviewing the code, so it probably won't make it in for a while. This is probably a general announcement to other UI devs on the list. From: Stephen Turner Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 2

Re: Review Request 17941: CLOUDSTACK-6075: Increase the ram size for router service offering

2014-04-17 Thread daan Hoogland
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/#review40646 --- please update or submit this review request. It will be discarded wh

Re: Review Request 17335: cleanup around seemingly impossible cast

2014-04-17 Thread daan Hoogland
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17335/#review40645 --- Lazslo, you still want this reviewed/applied? - daan Hoogland On

Re: Secondary Storage limits

2014-04-17 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Does "storage.overprovisioning.factor" Global setting is set to 1? Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 - - - *CloudOps*420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Gaurav Ara

Re: Review Request 17789: method to handle default template changes

2014-04-17 Thread daan Hoogland
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17789/#review40644 --- please revisit this patch to see if it can be closed - daan Hooglan

Re: Secondary Storage limits

2014-04-17 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
I used those numbers just for example. Here I am not creating template from Snapshot, I am registering through URL and then downloading it. Even in 2 GB case, it will exceed the limit if I set the limit as 5 GB. Here I am able to register 3 templates and get the total count as 6 GB which exceeds th

Re: Secondary Storage limits

2014-04-17 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Does the templates really use 10GB? because if you create a template from an Instance that have 10GB disk offering, the template might only consume 2GB on the secondary storage which is the used space of the virtual disk. Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 85

Secondary Storage limits

2014-04-17 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
Hi, I came across this scenario where secondary storage limit of the domain gets exceeded. Suppose we have set secondary storage limit for a domain as 20 GB and we register 2 templates of 10 GB each in the domain. Now as already the limit is reached, new template won't be registered. But suppose

Re: Review Request 16973: Contrail Event Interceptor fix

2014-04-17 Thread daan Hoogland
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16973/#review40642 --- how do you know that the domain/project actually uses contrail netwo

Slideshare link to my presentation

2014-04-17 Thread La Motta, David
Hey everybody, for those of you who are interested, here is the link to my presentation from CCCNA14: http://www.slideshare.net/dlamotta/bringing-netapp-data-ontap-apache-cloudstack-together David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer | Integrated Infrastructures NetApp Office: 1.919.476.5042

hackathon ccceu14

2014-04-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
LS, Last CCC, CCCNA14 was a great success, partly due to the colocation with apachecon. One of the less attended sessions was that of the hackathon. I would like to put some effort into making sure that there will be a hackathon session in Budapest and that it will be a success. For this I star

Re: Review Request 18902: CLOUDSTACK-6211: Xenserver - HA - SSVM fails to start due to running out of management Ip ranges when testing host down scenarios

2014-04-17 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18902/ --- (Updated April 17, 2014, 10:58 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik

Re: Review Request 18902: CLOUDSTACK-6211: Xenserver - HA - SSVM fails to start due to running out of management Ip ranges when testing host down scenarios

2014-04-17 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18902/ --- (Updated April 17, 2014, 10:56 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik

Re: Review Request 19912: [CLOUDSTACK-6322] Fixed Contrail: Params validation is missing while launching a service instance thru cloudmonkey

2014-04-17 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19912/#review40637 --- Commit 8d371ab031e14c04328a02117ba1435858b25bd3 in cloudstack's bran

Review Request 20445: Add new Command line options to setup/bindir/cloud-setup-databases.in and remove OS specific commands

2014-04-17 Thread Damodar Reddy Talakanti
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20445/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Frank Zhang, and Hugo Trippaers. Bug

RE: Best practice: Do not use innerHtml() property or it's equivalent jQuery .html() method

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Turner
Brian, didn't you fix most of these already? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Demetrius Tsitrelis [mailto:demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com] Sent: 17 April 2014 00:07 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Best practice: Do not use innerHtml() property or it's equivalent jQuery

Re: Security Group bug impeding system VMs functionality

2014-04-17 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Hi Nux, Can you please upload the logs. Please add steps to try for reproducing. Thanks, Jayapal On 16-Apr-2014, at 9:26 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi Nux, > > The paste links are does not exist. > Can you please upload the logs again. Also upload rules/logs specific to > system rules

Re: Review Request 19686: Implementation of the issue CLOUDSTACK 6139 - System.vm.use.local.storage global setting to zone setting

2014-04-17 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
> On April 16, 2014, 1:17 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > doesn't apply (anymore) can you rebase? sorry Sure... no problem. :) - Wilder --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19686/#r

Re: Best practice: Do not use innerHtml() property or it's equivalent jQuery .html() method

2014-04-17 Thread sebgoa
Can you open a bug on this. On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:06 AM, Demetrius Tsitrelis wrote: > This property is used to dynamically insert HTML into the UI. Unfortunately, > it is easily abused because it accepts input such as