---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21946/#review44096
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On May 27, 2014, 9:49
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21946/#review44097
---
Commit 5f11c2e0be06ff1580ee7898b6316a4d61412db8 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21946/#review44098
---
Commit 63090434b1cb4e7b87f0e024fbbc644faee863f7 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21971/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das.
Bugs:
Thanks Daan for the clarification!
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
What I mean is that to prevent the date of oct '14 moving we need to
Hi Prasanna,
Thanks for the reply. I will keep a watch on other communication thread for
hardware.
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:24 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Huang
Subject:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21971/#review44099
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On May 28, 2014, 6:14
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21971/#review44100
---
Why are you disabling the test? The bug reports indicate a problem
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/13
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21973/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6780
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21973/#review44103
---
test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py
It is 4.3.0-forward, so it might not hurt anybody but I dont like the look of
+ HEAD
try {
+===
+if (switchName == null
+ (nicTo.getType() == Networks.TrafficType.Control ||
nicTo.getType() == Networks.TrafficType.Management || nicTo.getType() ==
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
c91780449ae13d40ba9a2acfc5e0e6176f1beaee
is in
--
Daan
never mind my two mails ago
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:00 AM, i...@apache.org wrote:
...
- HEAD
try {
-===
-if (switchName == null
- (nicTo.getType() == Networks.TrafficType.Control ||
nicTo.getType() == Networks.TrafficType.Management ||
Hi,
I am looking into an issue where migration of a vm with its volume (storage
motion) fails. The root volume of the vm is on local storage. The issue is that
when LocalStoragePoolAllocator::select gets called and the hostid is included
in the plan, the function ends up returning local
On May 16, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Sorry if this email will sound a bit off, but it's rather late at night and
i've spent ages trying to figure out why ACS 4.3 is broken on a newly created
install with XenServer 4.3.
Could someone
On 05/28/2014 10:20 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote:
Hi,
I am looking into an issue where migration of a vm with its volume (storage
motion) fails. The root volume of the vm is on local storage. The issue is that
when LocalStoragePoolAllocator::select gets called and the hostid is included
in the
On May 28, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Why are you disabling the test? The bug reports indicate a problem in the
setup of the SSVM's network. The SSVM is unable to download the ISO because
of an unreachable network. That's got nothing to do with the test itself.
Our
On 05/28/2014 10:43 AM, sebgoa wrote:
On May 16, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Sorry if this email will sound a bit off, but it's rather late at night and
i've spent ages trying to figure out why ACS 4.3 is broken on a newly created
install with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/#review44106
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On May 23, 2014, 9:38
On May 28, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 05/28/2014 10:43 AM, sebgoa wrote:
On May 16, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Sorry if this email will sound a bit off, but it's rather late at night and
i've spent
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21973/
---
(Updated May 28, 2014, 9:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
On May 28, 2014, 7:09 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py, line 1118
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21973/diff/1/?file=597289#file597289line1118
Here, we are deleting with api_client_user, but in finally
self.apiclient. Is that the purpose?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21946/#review44108
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajesh Battala
On May 27, 2014, 9:49 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21900/#review44109
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On May 26, 2014, 5:12
Hi Hugo,
Can you push your commit
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=fefddc062486ed0c997309b719fd4b2f89b9b62c
to 4.4/4.4-forward also.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
1. The changes were first listed, implemented and then merged from topic branch
to master after a call for merge was made on the list. The changes were later
merged to 4.4-forward branch as it was mentioned that, daily automation and
regular runs were done using 4.4-forward branch. One thing
Hi there,
I'm having big time problems with Public IP missing from VPC VR's eth1,
after upgrade to ACS 4.3.1 - did not found this filed as bug so far...and
it worked all fine on ACS 4.2.1.
No help so far from user mailing list...
Below is a detailed explanation, and logs from inside VR, and
Hi all,
sorry, to bother you again with this thread.
Could at least someone that has the CS 4.3.0 deployed try to download a
volume and/or a template?
Could someone also check the database, table “cloud.host” and look if there
is an entry there for the running SSVM and console proxy VM?
On
GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/13
New section: General Upgrade Notes
Add section: General Upgrade Notes which does not include Upgrade
instruction but considerations an changes against the new version to upgrade to.
All, I'd like to submit the below proposal. This can also be found here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/New+API+call+to+chang
e+Primary+IP+address+after+VM+creation+in+Advanced+Zones
I've started looking into this project although before anything is written
I'd like
All,
I have made changes to the shell scripts within the CloudStack system
virtual machines that implement virtual routers for virtual private cloud.
Question:
What is the best way to test these scripts at the command line level?
I want to test my changes directly with a image of the vm which
Tryggvi,
Was it in progress? if so please mail Frank directly to collaborate.
if no please change the assignee to yourself and the state to in
progress. If you need rights to do so contact the dev list,
thanks,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Tryggvi Larusson (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
hey Karl,
A colleague at Schuberg Philis does tests in vbox as well so this must
be feasilble. I don't know what the initial implementers at citrix did
but it can't be to far off. As for unit tests for shell scripts look
for one of two sh-unit framework I know. And look further, there might
be
Check if agent is running your ssvm.
Thanks
-min
On 5/28/14 7:26 AM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
sorry, to bother you again with this thread.
Could at least someone that has the CS 4.3.0 deployed try to download a
volume and/or a template?
Could someone also
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/4#issuecomment-44436918
Wow, can't believe I actually forgot those...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/13
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
What agent are you talking about?
Is it an app that run into the SSVM?
I am using xenserver and XCP as the hypervisor.
I looked into the CS UI, infrastructureSystem VMs and the column that has
some values about the agent-state has a -- in it. Is it normal?
At the end, should the SSVM have an
Your UI indicates that agent is not running on your SSVM, it should show
as 'Running', that is why your cloud.host does not have an entry for your
new SSVM, thus we cannot find a remote host to send command to. Agent is a
java code running inside your SSVM, you should see what error you
thanks, I checked the /var/log/cloud/cloud.out, And I found this error:
ERROR AgentShell:607 - Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
Rajesh,
why must the date be removed from the name? I think we want it in
since the result depends on 3rd party software packaging.
regards,
Daan
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Hugo,
Can you push your commit
Just an update.
I have just checked my console proxy VM, which is also with -- in agent
state at insfrastructureSystem VM page.
The agente is running there, however its state is --.
I also looked into the source code, and the class
Andrija,
this sound like something we seen as well.
can you check if this is it :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6485
thanks,
Daan
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having big time problems with Public IP missing
Hi Daan,
I don't think this is my issue, at least I don't make use of private
gateway - this is just simple as: create new VPC from scratch - Public IP
is not assigned to VR eth1 interface inside VR...
I have filed the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6801
This same thing
Andrija,
nevertheless it sounds familiar. I will be back in the office on
monday and ask around.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
I don't think this is my issue, at least I don't make use of private
gateway - this is just simple as:
In case no-one as noticed :)
Apache infra modified the way the asf git repos get mirrored on github, it is
now almost immediate.
This is quite nice because cloning from github is actually much faster than
from asf git.
It is also very nice because our docs are built on readthedocs.org using
Thanks Daan,
my problem is that I'm in production for 3rd day now, and restoring DB and
downgrading back to 4.2.1 doesn't seem as option for me at the moment,
since I would loose new acounts and single VMs, etc...
Thanks,
Andrija
On 28 May 2014 21:34, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
You should clear old systemvm.iso from xen server so that new systemvm.iso
built can be deployed there.
Thanks
-min
On 5/28/14 12:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another interesting fact:
All the jars, cloud-**.jar are label as if they were 4.1.1 version.
Is that
There are 10 blockers ( 2 more than yesterday) and 78 ( 1more than yesterday)
critical defects outstanding.
2 unassigned defects need to be triaged today.
KeySummary Assignee
CLOUDSTACK-6793 [Automation] CreateTagsCmd fails with db exceptions
Unassigned
Can you resolve it so QA can pick it up. It is still in open state
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:15 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS 4.4] Blocker and Critical Defects 5/27
CLOUDSTACK-6644 was filed before I
Done.
Thanks
-min
On 5/28/14 2:01 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Can you resolve it so QA can pick it up. It is still in open state
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:15 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
On 05/28/2014 04:36 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote:
All, I'd like to submit the below proposal. This can also be found here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/New+API+call+to+chang
e+Primary+IP+address+after+VM+creation+in+Advanced+Zones
I've started looking into this project
by clear, you mean xe vdi-destroy uuid=vdi of systemvm.iso?
So, I just need to stop the management servers, run that in every cluster
that I have and everything should be fine?
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
You should clear old systemvm.iso from xen
I don't know the exact cmd line to clear that, and I have always used
XenCenter UI to do that, where clear tags in General tabs.
Thanks
-min
On 5/28/14 2:11 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
by clear, you mean xe vdi-destroy uuid=vdi of systemvm.iso?
So, I just need to
Just a heads-up that I've committed a small bit of code to master that
verifies template contents when downloading (per CLOUDSTACK-6088). For
example, it verifies that the first few bytes of a template registered as a
vhd format look like a vhd file. This is designed to catch mis-matches, and
in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/
---
(Updated May 29, 2014, 3:48 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh
Hi Adrija,
From the logs, the public subnet is untagged.
I think this issue is coming for the untagged public vlan in 4.3.
1.
Hi Andrija,
Same issue with public vlan tagged got fixed, CLOUDSTACK-5505.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 29-May-2014, at 9:38 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi Adrija,
From the logs, the public subnet is untagged.
I think this issue is coming for the untagged public
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/#review44233
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On May 29, 2014, 3:48
Hi devs,
I think I have found a bug affecting a primary storage migration if
the source and destination volume are on a CLVM storage.
So far I could follow the trail at :
- secondary storage is mounted on the source host with a new template id
- cp is issued to copy /dev/volgrpoup/uuid CLVM LV
Curious: What is the reason to change the primary IP? Quite un-cloudy.
@Wido: changing the IP in basic zone is quite involved, not just changing a
dnsmasq entry.
From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nlmailto:w...@widodh.nl
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Earlier there was no scenarios where deployment plan had host id specified for
a ROOT disk. If new scenarios like storage migration needs them, the condition
can be relaxed to remove data disk type check.
On 28-May-2014, at 2:18 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 05/28/2014
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/#review44235
---
Patch doesn't apply cleanly on master, Can you make sure that this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21926/#review44237
---
Commit 323de6823deda16ddafab5d79f18996c70130e2b in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21926/#review44238
---
Commit b105a33e0c1d2cfe21442c3a3c2af762d9105574 in cloudstack's
67 matches
Mail list logo
