Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #390

See

Re: Change IP subnet of cluster [SOLVED]

H Carlos, glad you figured it out. A colleague had a similar issue but his finding was that the host table included a timestamp to identify the management server. You are right about the replacement of the management server whether it is mac or timestamp, this will pose a problem. On Fri, Jul 25,

Re: Unable to build cloudstack.

Jaya, an error in the setnextversion.sh script. It didn't 'upgrade' the checkstyle pom. try again, please On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Elapavuluri, Jaya wrote: > I did a git pull > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 4:1

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: removed 'CloudStack on Windows' f...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/16 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feat

SSL Keystore functionality in CloudStack

I tried looking around to understand the role of SSL Keystore in CS and an exhaustive list of its functionality/Use cases in CS. I couldn't find any documentation that explains about it. Can anyone help me direct to any relevant documentation to understand keystore's role in CS, Thank you, Chan

Moving SVM range

Feeling good about moving my basic network deployment from one subnet to another, I would now like to move the System VM ip range and expand the guest VM range. I had been sharing the previous subnet with others and only had from .150 up through .249. The new subnet is all mine. As part of th

Re: Change IP subnet of cluster [SOLVED]

My system is back up and running. As I suspected in my second email the problem was related to the msid in the mshost table. Upon bringing up my system a new mshost entry was being created for the same MS and for some reason it was unable to connect to my XenServer hosts. I decided to go bac

RE: Unable to build cloudstack.

I did a git pull -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 4:11 PM To: dev Subject: Re: Unable to build cloudstack. Did you pull the branch or the tag? Erik 25. juli 2014 21:18 skrev "Elapavuluri, Jaya" følgende: > Hello, > > I had se

Re: Unable to build cloudstack.

Did you pull the branch or the tag? Erik 25. juli 2014 21:18 skrev "Elapavuluri, Jaya" følgende: > Hello, > > I had setup cloudstack 4.4 environment which was running fine. > > I recently did a git pull to get the updates after which when I tried to > mvn clean install I was encountering with th

Unable to build cloudstack.

Hello, I had setup cloudstack 4.4 environment which was running fine. I recently did a git pull to get the updates after which when I tried to mvn clean install I was encountering with the following error. Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (clo

[ACS4.4] Formal Release Date

Hi, Now that we are a go on 4.4, do we have a formal release date? I know we're in the process of building artifacts, updating the web site and all of that. I was just curious if there is a particular date we have in mind for the formal release? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack

Re: SSL keystore file name

Kishan - Thanks for the info. Can you explain a bit more on why we did this ? Where and how is it used and whether upgrade will be affected ? Thanks, -Nitin On 25/07/14 4:10 AM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote: >SSl keystore was changed from cloud.keystore to >cloudmanagementserver.keystore with below co

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7184

Hi Tim, Have a safe flight! I will make sure you¹ll get a copy of the logs. Thanks, Remi On 7/25/14, 5:57 PM, "Tim Mackey" wrote: >Ok. I'm boarding a plane now, but would love to get a copy of the >XenServer >logs from the relevant hosts, and the management server logs. I'm wanting >to see

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7184

Ok. I'm boarding a plane now, but would love to get a copy of the XenServer logs from the relevant hosts, and the management server logs. I'm wanting to see why XenServer allowed a vm to start with the same disk on two hosts. On Jul 25, 2014 8:53 AM, "Remi Bergsma" wrote: > Hi Tim, > > No, we do

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7184

Hi Tim, No, we do not use XenServer HA. Remi On 7/25/14, 5:46 PM, "Tim Mackey" wrote: >Remi, > >Did you have the native XenServer HA enabled at the same time? > >-tim >On Jul 25, 2014 8:31 AM, "Remi Bergsma" >wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> We had some serious corruption today, described in CLOU

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7184

Remi, Did you have the native XenServer HA enabled at the same time? -tim On Jul 25, 2014 8:31 AM, "Remi Bergsma" wrote: > Hi guys, > > We had some serious corruption today, described in CLOUDSTACK-7184 > (XenServer specific). > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7184 > > Some dis

CLOUDSTACK-7184

Hi guys, We had some serious corruption today, described in CLOUDSTACK-7184 (XenServer specific). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7184 Some discussion/help on how to prevent these issues is appreciated. Thx! Kind Regards, Remi Bergsma

RE: SSL keystore file name

Thanks Kishan for the info. -Original Message- From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 4:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wei Zhou; wilderrodrigues Subject: SSL keystore file name SSl keystore was changed from cloud.keystore to cloudmanage

Re: Review Request 21696: CLOUDSTACK-6716: /usr volume is to small on SVMs. Reshuffling some space to fix that.

> On May 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, the variables are subjective and would need testing > > before merging. Looks good. > > daan Hoogland wrote: > Joris, correct me if I am wrong: We are using these in our environments > at the moment. > > Joris van

Re: Review Request 21696: CLOUDSTACK-6716: /usr volume is to small on SVMs. Reshuffling some space to fix that.

> On May 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, the variables are subjective and would need testing > > before merging. Looks good. > > daan Hoogland wrote: > Joris, correct me if I am wrong: We are using these in our environments > at the moment. > > Joris van

Re: Review Request 23920: CLOUDSTACK-7181: Skip tests on KVM - changing service offering when VM is in running state - not supported on KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23920/#review48730 --- Commit 12ce5115e4c1879626bfdfabf27b71ca26fbccee in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 21696: CLOUDSTACK-6716: /usr volume is to small on SVMs. Reshuffling some space to fix that.

> On May 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, the variables are subjective and would need testing > > before merging. Looks good. > > daan Hoogland wrote: > Joris, correct me if I am wrong: We are using these in our environments > at the moment. Nope we are no

Re: Review Request 21696: CLOUDSTACK-6716: /usr volume is to small on SVMs. Reshuffling some space to fix that.

> On May 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, the variables are subjective and would need testing > > before merging. Looks good. Joris, correct me if I am wrong: We are using these in our environments at the moment. - daan -

Re: Failed add KVM agent to CS with latest master

I saw them coming in, great work. Let's hope the ones that caused the issue will trigger people to find the root cause this time. On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > I just pushed individual commits, so all should be in. > > Santhosh > _

Re: Review Request 23925: CLOUDSTACK-7183: Fixing cleanup issue in test_escalations_instances.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23925/#review48725 --- Commit 9245b7b71fb854b78f7690deef0a4f2fd344e148 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23918: CLOUDSTACK-7180: Tagging test case with product bug ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23918/#review48724 --- Commit 853d66a439148eb0cef8037d2c85a6c387c05f27 in cloudstack's bran

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow

That seems to handle my concern :-) Erik 25. juli 2014 13:16 skrev "Rajani Karuturi" følgende: > branches will be deleted after the release or hotfix if you use the > git-flow commands. > > This would be the flow for a hotfix: > 1. branch off from the release tag on master. in this case it would

Review Request 23929: Code rector - using library functions instead of repetative code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23929/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git

Re: Review Request 23929: Code refactor - using library functions instead of repetative code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23929/ --- (Updated July 25, 2014, 6:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shi

RE: Failed add KVM agent to CS with latest master

I just pushed individual commits, so all should be in. Santhosh From: Santhosh Edukulla Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 5:05 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Santhosh Edukulla Subject: RE: Failed add KVM agent to CS with latest master Agree. I decided to sp

Re: Review Request 23452: CLOUDSTACK-4840: Automation tests - LB for secondary IP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23452/ --- (Updated July 25, 2014, 12:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, suresh sadhu

Re: Review Request 23839: CLOUDSTACK-2251: Automation tests for dedicated guest vlan ranges per tenant feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23839/ --- (Updated July 25, 2014, 5:47 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, suresh sadhu,

Review Request 23928: Test script to verify CS-5986 fix for vpc networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23928/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CS-5986 https://

Review Request 23927: Skipping test instead of raising exception in case enough zones are not present for it to run on

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23927/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git

Review Request 23926: Removing basic tag from few test case which should not be run basic zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23926/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > may be we should use git-flow support instead of hotfix which doesn’t delete > the branch Good call Rajani -- Daan

Review Request 23925: CLOUDSTACK-7183: Fixing cleanup issue in test_escalations_instances.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23925/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7183 h

Re: Review Request 23924: Fixed some more Coverity issues in CitrixResourceBase.java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23924/ --- (Updated July 25, 2014, 11:21 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Redd

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow

branches will be deleted after the release or hotfix if you use the git-flow commands. This would be the flow for a hotfix: 1. branch off from the release tag on master. in this case it would be release/4.4.0 2. commit the fixes in hotfix/4.4.1 3. do the release 4. merge to develop 5. merge to

SSL keystore file name

SSl keystore was changed from cloud.keystore to cloudmanagementserver.keystore with below commit [1]. Later, related code change were over-written in commit [2]. I made changes [3] to keep keystore filename as cloudmanagementserver.keystore in all references. Please let me know if you see any i

Review Request 23924: Fixed some more Coverity issues in CitrixResourceBase.java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23924/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy and Rajani Karuturi. Repository: c

Re: Review Request 23915: Fixing some coverity reported issues

> On July 25, 2014, 10:11 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Ship It! commit 0a5940c9a80cfff827c469f92640a70b9037829a Author: Damodar AuthorDate: Fri Jul 25 14:40:21 2014 +0530 Commit: Rajani Karuturi CommitDate: Fri Jul 25 15:34:20 2014 +0530 Coverity: Fixing some of the coverity i

Re: Review Request 23915: Fixing some coverity reported issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23915/#review48719 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajani Karuturi On July 25, 2014, 9:12 a.m.,

Review Request 23922: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6980: UI for RegisterTemplate API does not expose requireshvm parameter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23922/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jessica Wang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6980 https

Re: editting the website

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/site/trunk Anything committed to there will get built to: cloudstack.staging.apache.org Once you are happy, we can publish via the cms: https://cms.apache.org/cloudstack/publish Its all password protected with your apache id/password. On 25 July 201

Review Request 23920: CLOUDSTACK-7181: Skip tests on KVM - changing service offering when VM is in running state - not supported on KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23920/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7181 h

Re: Review Request 23915: Fixing some coverity reported issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23915/ --- (Updated July 25, 2014, 9:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Rajani Karutu

Re: Review Request 23915: Fixing some coverity reported issues

> On July 25, 2014, 7:05 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Looks ok, did you verify whether the called functions at all return null? > > If they don't this would seem a false positive. Your change wouldn't hurt > > anyhow. I checked the xen code base they are returning null values as well. - Da

Re: Review Request 23395: CLOUDSTACK-5663 :- Handled the NULL check for network's cidr field to avoid NPE for createNetwork and listNetwork

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23395/#review48716 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkModelImpl.java

Re: Review Request 23843: Removed duplicated code block

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23843/#review48715 --- Ship it! ad640e2fda383dde56fbb02504678e5971e2a2b9 - daan Hoogland

Review Request 23918: CLOUDSTACK-7180: Tagging test case with product bug ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23918/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7180 h

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow

I went on and read the comments in http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html It contains a big warning on using gitflow that has been between my lines in this thread all along. Git flow is not going to solve our problem. It is a discipline that is captured in it that will

Re: Review Request 23915: Fixing some coverity reported issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23915/#review48714 --- plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/re

editting the website

I am sure I should know this: How do I edit the downloads.html on cloudstack.apache.org? Is this in a apacha cms or do we have it in a 'private' svn somewhere? -- Daan

Re: [CLOUDSTACK-6181] RBD Support not implemented

On 07/24/2014 06:38 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: I think I've found the cause of the resize failure. When using RBD for primary storage the disk is not allocated before the VM starts. The resize operation runs before the disk exists, and instead of failing completely it just updates the database

Re: Review Request 23915: Fixing some coverity reported issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23915/#review48713 --- Looks ok, did you verify whether the called functions at all return

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow

Rightful question Erik, Rajani mentioned that release branches will be deleted. This will only happen once the release is no longer supported. Any hotfix branch will still have to merged on that (and master possibly) until we stop supporting that branch. On the other hand you can branch from any