Re: Doubt - Secondary IP

2014-10-05 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Hi Gaurav, You are right. When vm is destroyed you need to configure ip manually on VM again. Thanks, Jayapal On 01-Oct-2014, at 12:58 PM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > Hi, > > I want to confirm the secondary IP behavior. Secondary IP is configured > manually on VM. When Vm is destroyed and reco

Re: Review Request 26224: CLOUDSTACK-7649: test_lb_secondary_ip.py - Removed SSH trying step after Destroying and Recovering VM because secondary IP information does not retain on VM nic after destroy

2014-10-05 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26224/ --- (Updated Oct. 6, 2014, 11:45 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Eduk

Review Request 26224: CLOUDSTACK-7649: test_lb_secondary_ip.py - Removed SSH trying step after Destroying and Recovering VM because secondary IP information does not retain on VM nic after destroying

2014-10-05 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26224/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edukulla and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.

Re: Review Request 25772: new nfs storage adapter for kvm hypervisor plugin to support managed storage.[CLOUDSTACK-7576].

2014-10-05 Thread punith s
> On Oct. 6, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > It looks pretty straightforward, doesn't look like it will break anything, > > and sounds like it works, so I'm ok with it. It looks like this performs a > > "1 qcow2 vol per nfs mount" type storage? > > Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hey

Re: Review Request 25772: new nfs storage adapter for kvm hypervisor plugin to support managed storage.[CLOUDSTACK-7576].

2014-10-05 Thread Mike Tutkowski
> On Oct. 5, 2014, 10:50 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > It looks pretty straightforward, doesn't look like it will break anything, > > and sounds like it works, so I'm ok with it. It looks like this performs a > > "1 qcow2 vol per nfs mount" type storage? Hey Marcus, If you're OK with this

Re: What IPsec VPN could we use to replace OpenSwan?

2014-10-05 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
+1 to StrongSwan since it seems to be compatible with OpenSwan as well strong routing support. Also superior documentation. From: Demetrius Tsitrelis mailto:demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Review Request 25772: new nfs storage adapter for kvm hypervisor plugin to support managed storage.[CLOUDSTACK-7576].

2014-10-05 Thread Marcus Sorensen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25772/#review55480 --- It looks pretty straightforward, doesn't look like it will break any

Re: Review Request 25772: new nfs storage adapter for kvm hypervisor plugin to support managed storage.[CLOUDSTACK-7576].

2014-10-05 Thread punith s
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25772/ --- (Updated Oct. 6, 2014, 9:52 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski