Re: old failed travis builds

someone should just get on the the Travis IRC/slack channel…and ask for help there… or even file a ticket with them…I am sure they can help > On Jun 26, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > > Yeah, though as much after thinking a bit, just popped in my mind after you > said you could tr

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.5.2 bugfix sprint

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/25/2015 09:35 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that 4.4.4 has passed, I would like to start a 4.5.2 release > effort soon. Please share any blockers, critical issues and other > problems you may have discovered with 4.5.1 that we shoul

Travis-ci build timeout error.

Hi, Travis-ci builds are timeout on branch. Below are the errors from travis-ci log Installing some python packages: /home/travis/build.sh: line 108: 2307 Terminated travis_jigger $! $timeout $cmd install 885.98s$ ./tools/travis/install.sh [debug] execute contextualize [debug] exe

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8556: Unable to delete attache...

Github user pritisarap12 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/481#discussion_r33328911 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_snapshot_limits.py --- @@ -115,32 +115,51 @@ def tearDownClass(cls): raise Exception("W

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-4.5-singlerun #248

See -- Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 303 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 490 originally caused by: Started by an

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Cleanup stale files in /tmp which is fill...

GitHub user rsafonseca opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/531 Cleanup stale files in /tmp which is filling up during some runs Output status of disk and memory on build host for some extra info on build environment before start This should fix

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1318

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2135 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change Started by upstream project "build-master"

Re: old failed travis builds

Yeah, though as much after thinking a bit, just popped in my mind after you said you could trigger the travis runs, but i guess it's just some GH feature i don't know sorry for question quicker than though :) Will push a fix for that in a few seconds then :) On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:51 AM, David

Re: old failed travis builds

So I don't have access to any of the Travis slaves - that's all managed by Travis-CI the company. I do have Admin access to the github org and by extension to all of the travis settings, but not employed by travis. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Hi David, > How much perm

Build failed in Jenkins: package-rhel63-4.5 #288

See -- Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 490 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 i

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115416654 @wilderrodrigues it's difficult to track changes, against JIRA which is why I asked for them to be squashed and use the CLOUDSTACK-8589. I think a single commit to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/529 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/528#issuecomment-115415116 @DaanHoogland you would need to close it manually since it was merged on 4.5 (non-master branch) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/529#discussion_r33310297 --- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java --- @@ -231,7 +232,9 @@ public DatabaseUpgradeChecker() { _u

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reduce script running time around 80%

Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/530#issuecomment-115413290 @bhaisaab not that w00ty.. its just on the downloadDeps.sh script.. its seems to be reducing 100/200 secs, this delay was introduced by the fix script itself, doe

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reduce script running time around 80%

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/530 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reduce script running time around 80%

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/530#issuecomment-115412673 w00t! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature ena

Re: old failed travis builds

I meant expand before_install.sh, not before_script.sh :) On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Hi David, > How much permissions do you have on the Travis Infra? > It seems some slaves have a full /tmp and are causing some failures due to > that... can you fix it, or should i

Re: old failed travis builds

Also - just for info - this should be resolved soonish https://help.github.com/articles/setting-up-teams-improved-organization-permissions/ --David On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:12 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Today, no. > Supposedly the GH folks are going to add a PR/GH only permissions > level, but t

Re: old failed travis builds

Hi David, How much permissions do you have on the Travis Infra? It seems some slaves have a full /tmp and are causing some failures due to that... can you fix it, or should i just draft a command that will try to safely cleanup the /tmp files before build starts ... something like rm -f all files o

Re: old failed travis builds

Today, no. Supposedly the GH folks are going to add a PR/GH only permissions level, but that isn't yet available. If you have a list of ones you'd like me to kick off, I can do so. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Anybody knows if I can restart travis builds that failed i

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reduce script running time around 80%

Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/530#issuecomment-115384919 It seems the performance impact was much bigger from my network than from Travis' Still reduces run times a bit though :) --- If your project is set up for i

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

Good point Daan, I like it! 2015-06-25 16:49 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland : > I still don't think travis is reliable enough to give a definite 'no'. > Two LGTMs is fine and a good argument if travis is red on why this is > not a problem for this case. > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Fonsec

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/529#issuecomment-115372865 LGTM, I'll add a 4.5.1 to 4.5.2 and 4.5.2 to 4.6.0 paths on master soon. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply app

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/528#issuecomment-115372739 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature ena

[DISCUSS] 4.5.2 bugfix sprint

Hi all, Now that 4.4.4 has passed, I would like to start a 4.5.2 release effort soon. Please share any blockers, critical issues and other problems you may have discovered with 4.5.1 that we should try to fix in ACS 4.5.2. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 26

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: SAML auth plugin improve...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/489#issuecomment-115341413 With the plugin enabled, only then users are shown a choice of login options: ![screen shot 2015-06-25 at 5 32 07 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: SAML auth plugin improve...

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/489#issuecomment-115305839 Excellent, let me know when you consider it ready and I'll give it a spin. Erik Den torsdag 25. juni 2015 skrev Rohit Yadav følgende:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8556: Unable to delete attache...

Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/481#discussion_r33268358 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_snapshot_limits.py --- @@ -115,32 +115,51 @@ def tearDownClass(cls): raise Exception("

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115289744 Hi @bhaisaab No, it doesn't change pwd in the hosts. I will implement that in a separate story/issue. Concerning the squash, I won't do it.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

Travis is still not there but it's already pretty close hehe.. hope to make it 100% soon :) On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I still don't think travis is reliable enough to give a definite 'no'. > Two LGTMs is fine and a good argument if travis is red on why this is > not

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reduce script running time around 80%

GitHub user rsafonseca opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/530 Reduce script running time around 80% This resolves the performance penalty introduced by adding the midonet repo downloadDeps.sh is taking around 9/10 mins to run on travis, this should

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: SAML auth plugin improve...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/489#issuecomment-115283322 @terbolous doing some UI changes now --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: SAML auth plugin improve...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/489#issuecomment-115283228 @terbolous I plan to build and share a repo tomorrow that you can use --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear o

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

I still don't think travis is reliable enough to give a definite 'no'. Two LGTMs is fine and a good argument if travis is red on why this is not a problem for this case. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Couldn't make it either :'( > > I think it's a very sound idea in prin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

Couldn't make it either :'( I think it's a very sound idea in principle, but afraid waiting for two LGTM might slow things down even further... up to the majority vote i guess it's a good principle either way :) On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/25/2015 04:38 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Folks, > > A few of us are in Amsterdam at DevOps days. We are chatting about > release management procedure. Remi is working on a set of > principles that he will put on the wiki to start a [DISCU

[PROPOSAL] Commit to master through PR only

Folks, A few of us are in Amsterdam at DevOps days. We are chatting about release management procedure. Remi is working on a set of principles that he will put on the wiki to start a [DISCUSS]. However to get started on the right track. I would like to propose the following easy step: Startin

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/529 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade Conflicts: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade

GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/528 4.4.4 to 4.5.2 upgrade You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack 4.4.4.-4.5-upgrade Alternatively you ca

next release

We are wrapping up 4.4.4. I am assuming there is a need for a 4.5.2 but want some confirmation in response to this. If we don't have extra blockers we should be able to release it within a week. next up is 4.6.0. :o anybody got some input on the release process we should follow? And voluntering t

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Update with 4.4.4 notes

Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/23#issuecomment-115266464 LGTM but I will let @pdion891 check it and merge. Not sure how we manage each branch now for publication. @terbolous --- If your project is set up for it, yo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: SAML auth plugin improve...

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/489#issuecomment-115259844 I can test your changes against ADFS if you want to, not sure if I can find time this week though. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: SAML auth plugin improve...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/489#issuecomment-115258944 open for review --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115258835 @wilderrodrigues also squash them :) will this change passwords on the hosts? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Wilder, then rebase and amend the comment as well to include the ticket number On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:12 PM, terbolous wrote: > Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115251794 > > Excellent, thanks :-) > > >

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1317

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2134 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2431 originally caused by: Started

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115251794 Excellent, thanks :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115250930 Indeed. :) I will create the ticket on ACS Jira and add to the PR description. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, y

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527#issuecomment-115249502 Would it be too much to ask for a corresponding Jira ticket? Definitely makes it easier to track changes when writing release notes :-) --- If your project is set

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: As an operator I want to be able to chang...

GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/527 As an operator I want to be able to change the KVM hypervisor credentials API call (updateHostPassword) changes credentials on XenServer hypervisor but not on KVM. This should be extende

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1316

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2133 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely o

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

old failed travis builds

Anybody knows if I can restart travis builds that failed in the past but should pass IMNSHO? I want to trigger some to see if I can merge them. I am not the owner of the pull request nor, obviously, of the ACS repo. -- Daan

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8439:Automation for feature CP...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/226#issuecomment-115224232 @sanju1010 are your concerns addressed adequately by @nitt10prashant ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply app

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: To Verfiy that list templates by domain a...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/189#issuecomment-115222723 @gauravaradhye will you do the honors? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1315

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2132 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2430 originally caused by: Started

Re: release notes

Got it, updated the docs accordingly. Thanks Daan On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > 9ced57551de5e1d62f2f7eb286440931bb6de262 uses the correct name, it was > changed to be more clarifying > > The other two where moved from the implementation to the interface. no > behavior

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1314

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2131 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely o

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add git status output to debug git fetch ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/523 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: release notes

9ced57551de5e1d62f2f7eb286440931bb6de262 uses the correct name, it was changed to be more clarifying The other two where moved from the implementation to the interface. no behavioral change. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > I added a section for both out of band migration/reb

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8588 - Remove redundant skip t...

GitHub user pritisarap12 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/526 CLOUDSTACK-8588 - Remove redundant skip test for LXC You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/pritisarap12/cloudstack removeRed

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1313

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2130 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2429 origin

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Using Profiler class, from the utils pack...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/525 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Using Profiler class, from the utils pack...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/524 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Update with 4.4.4 notes

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/23#issuecomment-115131799 @runseb or @pdion891 you care to take a look? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well

Re: release notes

I added a section for both out of band migration/reboots, and duplicate ssh keys in the ``what's new`` section -- Erik On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > no, though that's debatable: one fix is that adding the same public > key to a domain under a different name no longer