Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507#issuecomment-119082107
@DaanHoogland @runseb @bhaisaab @remibergsma
Does the LGTM idea also apply to integration tests?
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
2 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
3 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
2 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
3 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Hi,
I am trying to run marvin tests on cloudstack 4.3. the steps that i
followed are as follows :
1. build marvin from cloudstack 4.3 local repo using : 'mvn -P developer
-pl :cloud-marvin'
2. copied tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-0.1.0.tar to the server where i want to
run marvin tests.
3.
GitHub user nitt10prashant reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507
CLOUDSTACK-8577: fixing script testpath_disable_enable_zone
disable enable cluster ... === TestName: test_01_disable_enable_cluster |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
disable enable
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507#issuecomment-119082514
I have let Gaurav take care of things before because he was the only one
actually looking. I don't think we can afford to demand 2 LTGM on integration
tests. I
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507#issuecomment-119082808
Fair enough. I'm just asking because it should be made clear on the list.
It's already difficult to get 2 LGTM on the Java stuff, not many people
Can you try unistalling or using --upgrade in the pip command?
If that doesn't work can you try a 4.6/master version of marvin?
rgards,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Urvi Shah urvi.s...@nuagenetworks.net wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run marvin tests on cloudstack 4.3. the steps that i
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507#issuecomment-119083411
first let us not limmit the LTGM to commiters in the case of integration
tests. As for information, we will have to ask for it. Finally I want for us to
have a
I haven't heard of this in a few days. Does anyone keep track of 4.5
releasebility at the moment? I would like to move on to 4.6:) So can
we make a release candidate for 4.5.2 yet?
--
Daan
Hi Urvi,
Just go to ../tools/marvin directory under CS and run *python setup.py
install.*
Regards,
Santhosh
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can you try unistalling or using --upgrade in the pip command?
If that doesn't work can you try a
H,
for my own and your convenience I made a pull request builder at
builds.a.o yesterday. It seems to work and it will report license
issues in the PR or give an ok. I haven't seen an error apear yet So
no idea how that looks but I imagine it'll give you a link from the PR
to the build pointing
Github user nitt10prashant closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/539#issuecomment-119087564
@bhaisaab @karuturi @jburwell @everyone: can I get a second LGTM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
On 07-Jul-2015, at 11:47 am, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't heard of this in a few days. Does anyone keep track of 4.5
releasebility at the moment?
Yes. I’ve shared this earlier that I plan to start this in 1-2 weeks time, till
then I’m looking for regressions and
On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi John,
If you look at the discrete operations wearing a hat of a Project Manager,
you won’t care… neither would I. However, from a Software Engineer
perspective, as much as the other people contributing
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/558#discussion_r34012792
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_vpc_redundant.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,506 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
On Jul 7, 2015, at 8:17 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't heard of this in a few days. Does anyone keep track of 4.5
releasebility at the moment? I would like to move on to 4.6:) So can
we make a release candidate for 4.5.2 yet?
if you think it needs to be done, just
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/535#issuecomment-119087493
@bhaisaab @karuturi @jburwell @everyone: can I get a second LGTM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Hi Santosh,
I had already tried doing “python setup.py install”.
Thanks,
Urvi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Santhosh Edukulla
santhosh.eduku...@gmail.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: marvin installation error on cloudstack
To avoid misunderstanding arising from my unclear way of communicating:
I propose(d):
Let us base ourselves on integration testing whenever we can. Let us
seek affirmation by reporters whenever we can. Let us not take the
luxury to require both before closing issue but act on either.
On Tue,
Hi All,
Will the DR solution of Alena Prokharchyk will be implemented in the next
release of CS.
Or is there any DR solution available other than this.
Thanks,
Keerthi
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
This not a good candidate for squashing/huge commit.
If a regression is found in any of the fixes, it will be easier to just
revert it than reverting all the 70 commits.
~Rajani
Thanks Rajani, I allready made a booboo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/535
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1342/
--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2159
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
Started by upstream project build-master build number 2449
originally
Hi,
There are a number of Resolved Defects and was wondering if some of us can work
on closing the defects - I know this is one of the things that Sebastien had on
the To Dos...
Following is a snapshot from today...
Blockers : 114
Criticals: 556
Majors
Daan, appreciate the quick response... we can go that route for the less
Priorities ones and higher priorities ones, we should make an effort to
validate/close. Otherwise, not sure when we will be able to bring the counts
down ? blockers/criticals are higher risk items as well...
Other
This not a good candidate for squashing/huge commit.
If a regression is found in any of the fixes, it will be easier to just
revert it than reverting all the 70 commits.
~Rajani
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 07-Jul-2015, at 3:40 pm, Daan
Github user nitt10prashant commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/565#issuecomment-119188008
Test assign Vm to different account ... SKIP: unsupported storage type
Test assign Vm to different account ... SKIP: unsupported storage type
Stop
Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/565#issuecomment-119189897
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
On 07-Jul-2015, at 3:29 pm, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I want permission to go ahead and address these issues and not create
one huge or 73 small PRs. Can I?
One huge commit would be fine, testing/merging 73 small PRs is going to be some
work.
On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I will not do it in one commit, if we insist on a PR i will do 73 commits
in one PR.
are you automating those commits ?
I would not mind scanning through them and giving green light. and in that case
squash might be
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/539#discussion_r34026647
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/auth/APIAuthenticationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -52,17 +55,25 @@ public void
Rohit, are you basing this on 4.5? seems like a feature (meaning it
should be based on master).
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:42 AM, bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cloudstack
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.5-ui-plugin-enhancement [created] f8693d24a
ui: Allow UI plugins to be shown
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Depends - I would want this. One could say it’s a bug that UI plugins are
listed but hidden (see the code, a li is added, but if the section is a
plugin it hides it by setting display:none).
I can go for that :)
Raja, thanks for picking this up. I have practiced the principle of
awaiting (at least verbal) confirmation from the reporter that an
issue could indeed be closed. With the increased activity on
integration tests we might base ourselves on that.
ideas?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Raja
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/535#issuecomment-119151038
changes looks good. Please go ahead with the merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Guys `n' Dolls,
I want an exception to the rule requiring two LGTMs for any commit:
coverity reports 73 high impact issues at the moment. All of them are
resource leaks that can be solved by the well known pattern of using
try-with-resource. We (and I do mean a lot of us) have been fixing
this in
I will not do it in one commit, if we insist on a PR i will do 73 commits
in one PR.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 07-Jul-2015, at 3:29 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I want permission to go ahead and address these issues
ok, but we should not wait with a release for this or wait releasing 4.6?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 07-Jul-2015, at 3:17 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit, are you basing this on 4.5? seems like a feature (meaning it
Depends - I would want this. One could say it’s a bug that UI plugins are
listed but hidden (see the code, a li is added, but if the section is a
plugin it hides it by setting display:none).
Quick question - if a new feature, refactoring work or enhancement is sent for
master, will they be
Sorre Sebastien, I will -1 squashing any other then typo or to and fro commits.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:15 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I will not do it in one commit, if we insist on a PR i will do 73 commits
On 07-Jul-2015, at 3:40 pm, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I will not do it in one commit, if we insist on a PR i will do 73 commits
in one PR.
Fine.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/564
coverity resource leaks
This PR holds fixes for different resource leaks of the type that can be
fixed by using try-with resource. The complete category is to be absent from
coverity
GitHub user nitt10prashant opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/565
CLOUDSTACK-8615 :skip all tests in test_ps_limits.py for lxc
issue
---
All test cases are failing due to unsupported storage type
solution
---
skip
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/563
ui: Allow UI plugins to be shown on navigation bar
Introduces a boolean option in UI plugins setting it to 'true' would display
the UI plugin on the left navigation bar.
On 07-Jul-2015, at 3:17 pm, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit, are you basing this on 4.5? seems like a feature (meaning it
should be based on master).
Not a feature but refactoring - I want to show any UI plugin on left nav
without forking the
Hi All,
Since the DR structure is not ready yet in the CS 4.5.x is there any plan
to on Zone to Zone VM Migration this will really help us to make the DR
implementation or region to region migration for both xenserver and kvm.
Thanks,
Keerthi
48 matches
Mail list logo
