Hi, All,
This is part of the effort to create a Reference Guide for CloudStack
configuration parameters. This guide intends to provide a single point of
reference for the configuration parameters that we use in CloudStack. Each
parameter will be treated as a topic in this guide.
I am planning to
That'd be an interesting approach, I do something similar on my vanilla libvirt
installs.
This opens up some issues though, that of the HA of dnsmasq for one. It'd still
be an interesting idea, though and would very much play ball with the network
filtering bits.
Cheers for sharing Wido
--
Sen
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-183729063
LGTM
Master router:

I think adding Calico would be a nice idea. I do have strong contacts at
MetaSwitch (the company that open sourced it), so why don't you write a
proposal for it and sent it back to the list?
The good new is it's under an Apache License already
(https://github.com/projectcalico/calico/blob/maste
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-183715170
Manual Tests:
* Master Router
```
root@r-23-VM:~# ip addr | grep eth3 | grep state | awk '{print $9;}'
UP
root@r-23-VM:~# ip addr | g
> Op 13 februari 2016 om 10:41 schreef Nux! :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I saw it mentioned somewhere around here in the recent past, but don't recall
> details.
>
> Has anybody had any interesting ideas? I for one absolutely dread relying on
> the VR, and not because of the VR itself, but for the downt
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-183682371
I have done manual tests, but please do not merge it before I push the
existing integrations tests that I'm improving now to cover those findings.
C
GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413
Fix unique mac address per rVPC router
This PR fixes an issue we faced yesterday in production with Redundant VPCs
and Private Gateways.
In that case, we ended up with 2 interf
Thanks Paul, sounds interesting, looking forward to more details.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, 13 February, 2016 10:18:00
> Subject: RE: Getting rid of t
Hi Nux,
John Burwell and I have been tossing around a few ideas as we absolutely plan
to do 'something'. We're thinking along the lines of separating the system
'VM's from the processes that are run within it. And making the VR processes
actual processes which can be moved around and failed-ove
Hello,
I saw it mentioned somewhere around here in the recent past, but don't recall
details.
Has anybody had any interesting ideas? I for one absolutely dread relying on
the VR, and not because of the VR itself, but for the downtime involved with
upgrading it.
At work we've been running a SG
11 matches
Mail list logo