Re: [4.8][VPN] IPSec service does not start automatically in VR

2016-02-15 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
I think the current issue you rised is not related to strongswan PR. I'll gave it a try to strongswan. Did you tried it ? On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Nux! wrote: > Ah, ok, need to test > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-github/lastBuild/ then > It's kind

Re: [4.8][VPN] IPSec service does not start automatically in VR

2016-02-15 Thread Nux!
Ah, ok, need to test http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-github/lastBuild/ then It's kind of confusing, that pull requests just stops, people stopped caring about it. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From:

Re: New Ideas on Cloudstack

2016-02-15 Thread ilya
Not entirely clear what issue this solves. On 2/11/16 10:39 PM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to bring up some ideas about to integrate the > http://www.projectcalico.org into cloudstack to next step ahead. > > How really will this help. I need all your feedback on this. > >

Re: [4.8][VPN] IPSec service does not start automatically in VR

2016-02-15 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Good catch Nux!, Just found this is what's causing remote management VPN of not working with the 4.6 system-vm-template. seams to be related to this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9079 On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hello, > > Messing

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Taking fast and efficient volume snapshot...

2016-02-15 Thread mike-tutkowski
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r52953884 --- Diff: engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java --- @@ -172,6 +195,12 @@

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Taking fast and efficient volume snapshot...

2016-02-15 Thread syed
Github user syed commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-184250180 LGTM. I've also been testing this in my dev environment with no issues so far --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix unique mac address per rVPC router

2016-02-15 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-184246895 blwah --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3240

2016-02-15 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [priti.sarap] Squashing two commits in to single commit -- [...truncated 824 lines...] at

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Squashing two commits in to single commit

2016-02-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1411 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix unique mac address per rVPC router

2016-02-15 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-184191105 @DaanHoogland A private gw uses a single ip address so there's your issue :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Squashing two commits in to single commit

2016-02-15 Thread Sanjeev N
LGTM based on PR#667 On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:37 PM, DaanHoogland wrote: > Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1411#issuecomment-184182132 > > @sanjeevneelarapu If you LGTM this there are 2 LGTM here

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9265 cleanup around httpclient...

2016-02-15 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-184183368 catch Throwable is really evil, I agree. :( At least the catch Exception of BrocadeVcsApi is re-thrown. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9265 cleanup around httpclient...

2016-02-15 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-184182546 No problem Daan, I understand. I was referring to the try-catches at lines 58, 65 and 140 of “ClusterServiceServletHttpHandler”; and at line 472

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Squashing two commits in to single commit

2016-02-15 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1411#issuecomment-184182132 @sanjeevneelarapu If you LGTM this there are 2 LGTM here so please go ahead and merge. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix unique mac address per rVPC router

2016-02-15 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-184181722 @wilderrodrigues had a quick look. Why can't the gateway interface be up on the backup? Ip conflict? cause otherwise it seems no issue to me. Do the gateways

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9265 cleanup around httpclient...

2016-02-15 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-184178201 @rafaelweingartner very fine but really out of scope now. Can you be more specific? I suspect these are in code where an automatic 'final' policy was applied.

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Reference Guide for CloudStack configuration parameters

2016-02-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
I like the idea but shouldn't it be part of the source code and extracted from there? What is the need to have it in a separate wiki? On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Nice, maybe put this on our cwiki so others can collaborate than do this > over

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9280: Allow system VM volumes ...

2016-02-15 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1406#issuecomment-184136033 @GabrielBrascher added CollectionUtils.isEmpty. Any ideas on unit test-ability? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Reference Guide for CloudStack configuration parameters

2016-02-15 Thread Rohit Yadav
Nice, maybe put this on our cwiki so others can collaborate than do this over a word doc? Regards. [ShapeBlue] Rohit Yadav Software Architect , ShapeBlue d: | s: +44 203 603 0540 | m: +91