Github user dmabry commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-213853837
I made all requested changes. I'm going to run a full bubble CI test
against this PR and I will post the results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-213841496
Please review the details of the CI run. I am using a KVM
[bubble](https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/bubble-toolkit) to test this
and I have not tried to manua
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-213841009
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 9
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 2
```
**Summary of the problem(s):**
```
ER
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-213825554
regression suite passed:
[1516.results.network.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/233136/1516.results.network.txt)
[1516.results.vpc_
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-213822378
LGTM. Do you think we should translate this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
I will buy you a beer. :P
On Apr 23, 2016 10:08 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
> I'll collect that $5 when i come over Will. 😉
>
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: 23 Apr 2016 15:02
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds
>
> No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware!
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 20
Extra hardware is always welcome. :)
Now to automate a bubble run from end to end based on a queue of PRs (which
I definitely have).
Last night I built a marvin result parser that integrates with upr to
automate posting back bubble results automatically. I have a couple loose
ends to finish up, t
I'll collect that $5 when i come over Will. 😉
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: 23 Apr 2016 15:02
To: dev
Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds
No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware!
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Haha. Awesome. :)
>
> This was more to validate that i
No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware!
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Haha. Awesome. :)
>
> This was more to validate that it was OK that I configure parallelism in my
> CI environment.
> On Apr 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "Ian Rae" wrote:
>
> > Ok ok, point made, we ca
Haha. Awesome. :)
This was more to validate that it was OK that I configure parallelism in my
CI environment.
On Apr 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "Ian Rae" wrote:
> Ok ok, point made, we can buy you new hardware Will ;)
>
> On Saturday, 23 April 2016, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reports guys.
Fx"dxxxffzxzsd
Em 21 de abr de 2016 07:10, "jayapalu" escreveu:
> Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1255#issuecomment-212842613
>
> @kansal Can you please complete the localisation changes.
>
>
> ---
> If your project is set
Great stuff Seb, Skippbox and ShapeBlue! Look forward to tire kicking...
On Friday, 22 April 2016, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been quite silent this past few weeks because aside from voting in
> a new VP (soon to be announced), I have been hard at work for my new
> endeavo
Ok ok, point made, we can buy you new hardware Will ;)
On Saturday, 23 April 2016, Will Stevens wrote:
> Thanks for the reports guys. :)
> On Apr 23, 2016 7:22 AM, "Paul Angus" > wrote:
>
> > My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4
> cores.
> > The speed itself is do
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-213728252
Let's leave this open for now. I want to understand what is needed to fix
this project wide.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
I plan to do quite a bit of work on this front over the next couple weeks
in prep for the RC next month. I am also trying to push the idea of
distributed CI and I feel that stabilizing and improving the state of our
tests is a big piece of that.
On Apr 23, 2016 3:17 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
> Hi W
Thanks for the reports guys. :)
On Apr 23, 2016 7:22 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
> My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4 cores.
> The speed itself is down to my overclocked processor, but still, it runs
> stably on 4 cores running at 25% over there stock speed.
>
> mvn -
My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4 cores.
The speed itself is down to my overclocked processor, but still, it runs stably
on 4 cores running at 25% over there stock speed.
mvn -T 4.0C -Dnoredist install
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#discussion_r60826448
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/capacity/dao/CapacityDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -962,35 +962,58 @@ public boolean removeBy(Short capacityType, Long
z
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#discussion_r60826329
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/capacity/dao/CapacityDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -962,35 +962,58 @@ public boolean removeBy(Short capacityType, Long
z
Nice site, Go skipbox
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham <
madangan...@actonmagic.com> wrote:
> +1 Sebastien; This is a great add to CloudStack.
>
> Congratulations to Skippbox and Shapeblue for this milestone.
>
> Would love to give it a real try to embrace it in AoC.
>
>
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-213702911
I added a few comments, but before I continue:
- Why assume a IP-Address and not a hostname OR IP? I know enough IPMIs why
are available through a DNS hostname
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r60825823
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ConfigureOutOfBandManagementCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Licensed t
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r60825819
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ConfigureOutOfBandManagementCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Licensed t
> Op 22 april 2016 om 18:02 schreef Sebastien Goasguen :
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been quite silent this past few weeks because aside from voting in a
> new VP (soon to be announced), I have been hard at work for my new endeavors
> with Skippbox.
>
> I am quite excited that today we could
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-213701028
Ok, leave this PR open or closed?
Keep in mind, the API of both packages is rather similar. Just the
connection creating is different. Atferwards it is getting
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-213693730
I did some basic tests yesterday. Some comments based on that. Will do some
more testing next week.
- I see that commands.properties is removed altogether an
Github user cloudsadhu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1458#issuecomment-213686569
Thanks Swill and now All the checks are passed.Please merge this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Hi Will,
I little while back I created a matrix to attempt to keep track of the tests
and their status.
Various other projects have stopped me getting to the stage where I could start
putting anything in...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+Test+Matrix
Kind rega
28 matches
Mail list logo