[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1607: SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.

2016-07-10 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607 changes looks good. It would be great if a test case can be added. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1607: SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.

2016-07-10 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607 LGTM @ProjectMoon can you push -f, the Jenkins build failed --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1601: CLOUDSTACK-9348: Reduce Nio selector wait tim...

2016-07-10 Thread rhtyd
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1601 CLOUDSTACK-9348: Reduce Nio selector wait time This reduced the Nio loop selector wait time, this way the selector will check frequently (as much as 100ms per iteration) and handle any pendi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1601: CLOUDSTACK-9348: Reduce Nio selector wait tim...

2016-07-10 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1601 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1583: Update L10N resource files with 4.9 strings from Tra...

2016-07-10 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fea

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

2016-07-10 Thread Paul Angus
Guys, Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then manually intervention is a -1 in my book. Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to work in a slick manner. We

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

2016-07-10 Thread Milamber
Hello, My vote +1 (binding) Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers (CS over CS) (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) : 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, create user, create ssh key