Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Hi Will and Team Can someone point me to upgrade instructions if such exist. Would like to avoid learning through trial and error if possible. I will be testing upgrade and functionality of KVM & VMware Advanced Shared Zones from ACS4.5.2 to latest. Thanks ilya On 7/29/16 11:06 AM, ilya

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615 Thanks @koushik-das! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1619: Add the Transifex config for next version of CS (4.1...

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1622: Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1511: 4.9/master bountycastle changes

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511 Let's have another attempt at this? /cc @karuturi @jburwell @DaanHoogland @wido @swill @koushik-das @abhinandanprateek and others --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to de...

GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531 systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to debian 7.11 iso - Bumps base debian iso to version 7.11 - Upgrade ruby version to 2.3.0 (latest/stable) - Fix Gemfile - Update README

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to debian 7....

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531 @karuturi @jburwell this PR has enough review, can we merge this? The changes are necessary without them the systemvm template appliance building fails, tested and built these templates:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to de...

Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1599: Marvin: Fix codegenerator to work with API discovery

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599 Pinging for review - @wido @koushik-das @karuturi @abhinandanprateek @jburwell This enables `cloudstackAPI` api cmd/resp classes generation against a live running mgmt server. --- If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1611: marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611 Pinging for review - @wido @karuturi @koushik-das @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy @jburwell This is marvin specific change, Travis validation is enough to show that deployDatacenter

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1611: marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads

Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1612: packaging: Marvin and integration-tests packages

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612 Pinging for review -- @karuturi @koushik-das @abhinandanprateek @jburwell If we can get this merged soon, all new PRs etc can be tested easily with CI systems as we'll get the marvin and

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1611: marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads

GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611 marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads This speeds up cluster deployment by Marvin, each cluster deployment can be executed in separate threads. This for example, allows for setting up

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1620: oobm: simply change password transactional lo...

GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620 oobm: simply change password transactional logic - Simplifies change password transactional logic without using pessmistic locks - Adds a re-enter password field in the UI to valid

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1620: oobm: simply change password transactional lo...

Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: 4.10.0 release

ouch.. looks like my email client stripped all the new lines. Re-sending from webmail Hi All, These are the proposed dates for 4.10 release (copied from another thread by John Burwell) * Development (master open to features and defect fixes): 1 August 2016 - 11 September 2016 * Testing: 12 - 18

Re: Next Releases

> Op 2 augustus 2016 om 4:36 schreef John Burwell : > > > All, > > First, thank you to Will for taking on 4.9 and getting it out the door. I > have updated the proposed release schedule [1] to reflect the release of > 4.9.0 on 1 August 2016. Please review the

Re: 4.10.0 release

A newline or two wouldn't hurt, this is pretty hard to read tbh. -- Erik On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Hi All,These are the proposed dates for 4.10 release (copied from > another thread by John Burwell)* Development (master open to > features and

4.10.0 release

Hi All,These are the proposed dates for 4.10 release (copied from another thread by John Burwell)* Development (master open to features and defect fixes): 1 August 2016 - 11 September 2016* Testing: 12 - 18 September 2016* RC Voting: 19 - 25 September 2016* Release: 26 September 2016 master is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Early LTS Initial Release

The idea of maintaing the release branch longer can be discussed. But, I am -1 for separate branches and separate release trains. Maintaing the upgrade paths would be a big overhead. We are not doing regular releases on the main release branches. Rohit did a great job for 4.5(though it was