Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-20
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1682
Test completed. 49 look ok, 4 have errors
Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 90.686
test_04_rvpc_privategw_
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski and @jburwell I think nobody has the test configurations
requested. There is no point waiting indefinitely on a configuration which
nobody has or wants to test. Let wait for 2
Thanks, Sergey!
On 9/21/16, 5:37 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote:
@mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week
On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski" wrote:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/
@mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week
On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski" wrote:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thank you, @karuturi!
Does anyone know who
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1683
LGTM for testing
Before
sshClient: DEBUG: {Cmd: ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 via Host: 10.140.12.103}
{returns: [u'PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.', u'64 bytes from
8.8.8.8: icmp_
GitHub user PaulAngus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1683
fix ping tests to properly recognise successful ping test
fix ping tests to properly recognise successful ping test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ gi
Good luck with that, hopefully an experienced coder can step up and help.
Lack of Ipv6 is really the big elephant in the room when it comes to Cloudstack.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Schneider"
> To: dev@clo
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thank you, @karuturi!
Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked for? I
can't due to this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144
(but
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871
@jburwell @rhtyd @karuturi @nvazquez I assume the current code doesnât
allow volume snapshots on the top of vmsnapshots on purpose. In that case is it
best to revert PR871 or create a new PR to
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871
Hi @sanju1010,
@serg38 and I are working on this PR #1677 which solves vm snapshot
creation issue. After running `test_vm_snapshots.py` we're getting exception on
`test_01_test_vm_volum
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1677
@jburwell @rhtyd could you please review this? As problem is that vCenter
sends recents tasks with null name, I simply added `StringUtils.isNotBlank`
check before comparing task's name, do you
Hi,
Basicaly I have a plan to implement IPv6 in advanced zone with ospf or
bgp routing based on this doc with some improvement:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+in+VPC+Router
The first thing I will do, is to test my setup by running script manualy
on the virtual router,
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
Solved, thanks @rafaelweingartner
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@serg38 with your explanations, I am ok with the current state of this PR.
No further changes are needed.
There is only one problem now. There are some merge conflicts that have to
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@jburwell This PR is waiting for your review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@jburwell @rhtyd What are your ideas on where in DB to store it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@rhtyd @jburwell @rafaelweingartner @koushik-das Can we agree if this PR is
OK as it is ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
You guys should get in touch with Exoscale, I think they made progress with
IPv6 in SG zones.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Wido den Hollander"
> To: "Thomas Schneider" ,
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent:
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
Great, thanks @rhtyd!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 102
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=99
Failed=2
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
My git foo abandoned me and left a mess â¹
. Iâll be sending a clean pr later todayâ¦
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
VP Technology
paul.an...@sha
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
@PaulAngus @jburwell @rhtyd This PR was closed without merging. Are we
still on track to include the fix to 4.9.1 ? I can ask @nvazquez to pick this
one up if needed.
---
If your project is se
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1681
@murali-reddy This issue might be related to PR1660. Do you mind testing
against latest master to see if you it is addressed already?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
Based on tests, lgtms I'll proceed to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
> Op 20 september 2016 om 23:10 schreef Thomas Schneider
> :
>
>
> Hi Everybody
>
> I would like to know what is the state of IPv6 implementation in Cloudstack.
>
Stuff didn't really advance yet. Are you looking into Basic or Advanced
Networking?
> I have good skills in IPv6 and routing an
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1678
@rhtyd thanks for sharing nordist repo. I have sanitized the vmware plugin
too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
I started BVT run(xenserver, advanced zone) on this PR. @cloudmonger will
post the results here in approx. 4 hrs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
I already posted the results for that configuration(a comment form
@cloudmonger with test results) its all good there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1682
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-19
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
@cloudmonger thanks
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan failed due to 'physicalnetwork 200 has
allocated vnets in the range 734-735'. Possibly due to stale network that was
not cleaned
Github user abhinandanprateek closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1643
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1682
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1682
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1682
IGNORE this PR
Ignore this PR/commit, this is for testing Trilllian, @BlueOrangutan
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-18
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@rhtyd I didn't realize that we needed a system VM template for this one.
It is too late in the release process for 4.9.1.0 and 4.10.0.0 to cut new
system VM template.
For LTS, yes, w
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@wido can you change the base back to master for now, @jburwell to use this
we'll need to build/publish new systemvmtemplate. Is that feasible for the LTS
release? If so, we'll need to make change
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 101
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=1
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
Sorry backend is `down`, please try again after sometime.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@rhtyd Do you want to backport this to 4.9 then? I've changed the base to
4.9 now, take a look about what you think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
I think we can change base to 4.9 as the amount of conflicts will be
minimal. At this point, it would add a lot of overhead to support 4.8, 4.9,
master (4.10) simultaneous. As per our agreed guide
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@jburwell Ok, thanks. Why against 4.8? I'm probably missing a point here,
but master is where new features go, right?
If I change the base to 4.8 the amount of commits which come in are hug
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests against packages at
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1545
---
If your pro
52 matches
Mail list logo
