Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
Thanks @mike-tutkowski. Will take a look at #1749
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7
mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up
Can you move the routerVM on the same hypervisor as guest VM (or guest
VM to same hypervisor as routerVM)? If it works, then move the routerVM
out to another hypervisor within the same cluster (but same switch).
Are you running vSphere? I've seen similar problem where ARPs would not
make it thru
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@jburwell @karuturi Although I won't be able to run regression tests on
#1749 anytime soon (due to being out of the country for a while), @syed has
volunteered to do so.
---
If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@jburwell @karuturi I went ahead and opened #1749. That one just has the
fixes for #1600. That should go into 4.10 because it fixes pretty important
issues and is low risk.
---
If your
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots
This PR is to address a few issues in #1600 (which was recently merged to
master for 4.10).
In
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735
@rhtyd @jburwell The tests didn't kick in last time. Can we fire matrix
again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
@jburwell Non-VPC tests on VmWare passed this time. This one seems to be
ready for merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
Trillian test result (tid-299)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 34414 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@mike-tutkowski I will slot this PR into the 4.11.0.0 release. For the
next release cycle, I would like to expand testing scenarios to include
multi-zone, as well as, zone-wide storage which
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus @jburwell I've added more changes and rebased. now My tests are
now running without errors. I did add the ` --config
global{metadata_read_only=0} ` as suggested by @PaulAngus and did
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@karuturi @jburwell Oh, and just to point out, the reason I embedded those
changes in this PR at the time was because I couldn't finish running my
regression tests on this PR until that
Github user syed commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711#discussion_r86864517
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4910to41000.sql ---
@@ -35,4 +35,192 @@ INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,
hypervisor_type, hypervi
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@karuturi @jburwell Hi
I was recently working on some enhancements to 4.5 for a prospect.
Once I completed that work in their custom branch, I wanted to forward port
the
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
All tests for managed storage have been run and passed:
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/576566/results.txt)
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
KVM enhancements for managed storage
This PR contains changes mainly related to enhancing managed storage on
KVM. I recently added these features to a custom build of 4.5 for a prospect
can you paste the result of following command?
cat /etc/dnsmasq.conf |grep -v "^#" |grep -v "^$"
-Wei
2016-11-07 20:27 GMT+01:00 Cloud List :
> Hi Wei,
>
> In addition,
>
> The VR is serving a shared not isolated network, meaning the IP it serves
> is 'guest' not 'public'
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
@jburwell John, this is a small bug fix for issue: failed to delete
snapshot on RBD if the original volume is removed.
It will not impact other scenario and bring other issues.
I
I wonder if there are more VMs than the range allowed in the guest network.
The excess VMs may not be getting IPs.
Check
/etc/dnsmasq.d/multiple_ranges.conf
/etc/dnsmasq.conf
Check this
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2008q3/002301.html
You can also turn on logging on
Hi Wei,
In addition,
The VR is serving a shared not isolated network, meaning the IP it serves
is 'guest' not 'public' IP. Will that make a difference on the iptables
command we need to execute?
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Cloud List
Hi Wei and Ozhan,
Thanks for your reply.
The problem doesn't affect only Debian-based guest VMs, but also affected
some Windows and Ubuntu-based VMs as well. I have executed the command on
the VR and reset the NIC of the guest VM, but unfortunately the issue still
persists.
iptables -t mangle
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1730
@marcaurele thank you for the cleanup. Since this change does not fix a
defect, we will hold off merging this PR until after after the
4.82.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 release set is completed.
---
GOOD point.
@CloudList, can you try again after executing the following command in VR ?
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM
--checksum-fill
-Wei
2016-11-07 14:46 GMT+01:00 Özhan Rüzgar Karaman :
> Hi;
> Whats your problematic vm's
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi @jburwell , i am so sorry but i do not understand, what you mean by
combining fixes under a single pr because this is a only single fix with a 4
lines of code change which only effects rbd
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
@murali-reddy only the following failures are expected:
* `test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn`
* `test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn`
The test failures, particularly around
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
@ozhanrk I recommend combining the fixes into a single PR for review
cohesion and to ensure that the merge maintains the stability of the release
branches. You could either amend this PR with
Github user rajesh-battala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/846
code/patch LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
@wido there are two errors related to template download in the
blueorganutan run that we need to explain before merging this PR. We are
seeing a similar issue on #1587. @abhinandanprateek
Hi;
Whats your problematic vm's type is it Debian? Maybe you are affected from
the bug CLOUDSTACK-8326? I do not know if this bug has effected on ACS 4.2
release but i know that it effects release 4.8.x 4.9.x
Thanks
Özhan
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Cloud List wrote:
>
Hi Wei,
Thanks for your reply.
I checked and I can confirm that the mac address is listed on
/etc/dhcphosts.txt in VR.
For example:
Nov 7 13:30:19 dnsmasq-dhcp[18986]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:31:ac:01:13:YY
ignored
Nov 7 13:30:24 dnsmasq-dhcp[18986]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:31:ac:01:13:YY
If the mac address is not listed in /etc/dhcphosts.txt in VR, the request
will be ignored.
Can you give more details so we can reproduce it and fix it ?
-Wei
2016-11-07 13:44 GMT+01:00 Cloud List :
> Hi,
>
> After our upgrade from CloudStack 4.2 to 4.8.1.1, we noted that
Thanks Sergey, appreciate your reply. Points noted.
Cheers.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> What essentially happens here that for each domain, you have access with
> your key, ACS executes 12 queries to get domain limits. Even if
Hi,
After our upgrade from CloudStack 4.2 to 4.8.1.1, we noted that some (but
not all) of our VMs are not able to get DHCP from the VR. This gives
problem when the VM is restarted and cannot get up and running because
unable to get IP.
I logged in to the VR and found below messages showing that
Hi,
That's what I thought was the case. Is there any particular process for
moving configs to the depot besides just moving it out of the enum and into
a manager bean somewhere? For example, would the pull request(s) need to
have a database migration of some kind?
Jeff
*Jeff Hair*
Technical
Config enum is legacy code. For any new configuration parameters ConfigDepot
should be used. Some of the parameters got moved from Config enum to the
appropriate manager classes (where it is getting used). But there are still lot
of them left to be moved. Feel free to submit a PR for moving
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
This one has two LGTMs, I think we can merge it in?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Hi,
What's the difference between the Config enum and the ConfigDepot? It seems
like the configuration options are somwhat arbitrarily split between the
two. ConfigDepot entries get created automatically, while ones in the
Config enum don't (and thus require a database migration). ConfigDepot
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1713
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
40 matches
Mail list logo