Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1811
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1811
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794#discussion_r91235138
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4910to41000.sql ---
@@ -45,4 +45,48 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`vlan_details` (
`display` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
@rajesh-battala : Thanks for giving the details. I will go through the
video. If i find a case where it is really required then I will modify the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
component test results. If any one wish to run component test
test_multiple_public_interfaces.py, add a new public ip range in the
test_daya.py, in the 'publiciprange' dict object.
Github user rajesh-battala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
Here is the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qybCr1klhKk&t=1108s
I have seen in this demo video about using that extra page
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Nitin Kumar Maha
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1815
Thanks @rhtyd, let merge it so we have the simulator back online on docker
hub and let's improve our Docker images...
@jburwell, @rhtyd , do I merge it or you do it? I'm just wondering
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd It took a few force pushes, but it worked. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Trillian test result (tid-597)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36723 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1809
Trillian test result (tid-599)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26799 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
We've enough code review, and test results. Test LGTM, some failures with
vpc/rvr are known intermittent failures. The Travis failure is caused by
`component/test_volumes`, which I found is failin
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@rhtyd If you merge this you will break #1600. We may want to do some more
testing on the upgrade path, but I believe @syed has done some testing of the
upgrade path. Maybe we can put together a
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Trillian test result (tid-596)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25569 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
@prashanthvarma we're waiting for a final LGTM from @murali-reddy can you
do a `push -f` to re-kick Travis. (though I checked the failure is not due to
your PR). @murali-reddy can you please revie
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@serg38 I think we can do that, but will be also need some tooling to
rename the actual files on the SRs? /cc @abhinandanprateek
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@syed Thanks, so just to confirm... with this PR, is your work with #1600
works and is not broken?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Hi Patrick,
You're right, in the 'how to build cloudstack' wiki we've not mentioned this.
You can run it like this:
mvn clean install -P usage -pl usage # This will work given that other
dependencies are already built/installed
mvn -P usage -pl usage -Drun -Dpid=$$ # This runs the usage ser
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
@koushik-das @rhtyd I pushed changes for supporting custom service
offerings the way @koushik-das and @serg38 proposed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
@abhinandanprateek
Below is test scenario and result. I have also reverted the changes
introduced in CLOUDSTACK-9376.
Test Scenario:
Domain: SUDDOMAIN
Domain Admin: s
Hey all,
Since 4.9, usage is broken if you have a project that has resources.
Basically, it is an autoboxing NPE because a project account has no role
(UsageDaoImpl line 116). I know where to fix it, but I can't find any
documentation about running the usage server in a dev setup, so I can't
test
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@syed @rhtyd @abhinandanprateek Why cant we simply rename all install paths
in DB for existing snapshots instead. It can be as simple as adding this query
to schema upgrade path
UPDATE cloud.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Trillian test result (tid-594)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 34189 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@abhinandanprateek the snapshot path is something which is internal to
Cloudstack, as an end user, I would not be able to tell the difference before
and after the upgrade, unless I missed something
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@rhtyd I understand that we want to avoid breaking upgrades. But I have
upgraded my setup and I did not find any problems. I am trying to understand
what will break if upgrades happen, given the fa
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Rebased against master and fixed merge conflicts...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Trillian test result (tid-592)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36740 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 159
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=4
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@jayapalu Can you expand on your findings regarding public ip order? Did
you pull in the latest PR with the fixes from @swill?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
@rhtyd Just to make sure, are we waiting for a LGTM to merge this PR ?
May be, @jburwell can comment and/or give a LGTM as he has reviewed the PR
:)
---
If your project is set u
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@rhtyd unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os are:
`centos6, centos7, ubuntu`. Supported hypervisors are: `kvm-centos6,
kvm-centos7, kvm-ubuntu, xenserver-65sp1, xenserv
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@blueorangutan test
On 6 Dec 2016 18:11, "Blue Orangutan Build Things"
wrote:
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-330
â
You are re
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-330
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@rhtyd please proceed with merge. I have not added the test
suite(test_multiple_public_interfaces.py) part of this PR as smoke tests,
because it takes around an hour for execution so they a
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/29
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Thanks @murali-reddy @borisstoyanov I'll proceed with merging this now.
@murali-reddy do you want to run the component test on this PR or on 1753/1754?
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
@rajesh-battala : From my observation, I found whatever we can do in Add
Load Balancer tab, the same can be performed in load balancing section after
selecting any IP. Do you think any sc
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818
CLOUDSTACK-9655 The template which is registered in all zones will be
deleted by deleting 1 template on any zone
added extra warning message if it's a cross-zone template ("This is a
cross
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1805
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 157
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=97
Failed=6
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd
While testing this feature public ip order change on reboot issue blocked
this.
My suggestion is that public ip out of order is different issue. If vpn
functionalities working e
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1805
I've manually verified the bug fix, looks OK
```
(local) SBCM5> list templates name=newTemp templatefilter=all
{
"count": 1,
"template": [
{
"accoun
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
@rhtyd : Changed PR's base branch to 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
code change LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user krissterckx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1792
@jburwell : Switched the base branch to 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Yes I think test failures does not seem to be caused by this PR, LGTM based
on code review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1804
@rhtyd : Changed the base branch to 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
50 matches
Mail list logo
