[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-21 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711 Yes it is in 4.9.2. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 21 jan. 2017 om 22:59 heeft Syed Ahmed het volgende > geschreven: > > Exposing this via an API would be tricky but it can definitely be added as > a cluster-wide or a global setting in my opinion. By enabling that, all the > instances would be using VirtIO SCSI. Is

RE: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Simon Weller
Personally, I'd doubt it. The scsi is the replacement for the blk driver. Simon Weller/615-312-6068 -Original Message- From: Syed Ahmed [sah...@cloudops.com] Received: Saturday, 21 Jan 2017, 3:59PM To: Simon Weller [swel...@ena.com] CC: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Syed Ahmed
Exposing this via an API would be tricky but it can definitely be added as a cluster-wide or a global setting in my opinion. By enabling that, all the instances would be using VirtIO SCSI. Is there a reason you'd want some instances to use VirtIIO and others to use VirtIO SCSI? On Sat, Jan 21,

RE: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Simon Weller
For the record, we've been looking into this as well. Has anyone tried it with Windows VMs before? The standard virtio driver doesn't support spanned disks and that's something we'd really like to enable for our customers. Simon Weller/615-312-6068 -Original Message- From: Wido den

Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 21 januari 2017 om 16:15 schreef Syed Ahmed : > > > Wido, > > Were you thinking of adding this as a global setting? I can see why it will > be useful. I'm happy to review any ideas you might have around this. > Well, not really. We don't have any structure for this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-21 Thread ciroiriarte
Github user ciroiriarte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711 Hi!, is this already included in 4.9.2.0?, I'm installing a new XS7 lab and would like to integrate it with Cloudstack. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-21 Thread Will Stevens
It is likely my environment. I had some connectivity issues in this envs when I was using them before. I have a pretty recent master in, but I can relate tonight to be sure. Can we kick off your CI to see what yours says? On Jan 21, 2017 2:24 AM, "PaulAngus" wrote: > Github

Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Syed Ahmed
Wido, Were you thinking of adding this as a global setting? I can see why it will be useful. I'm happy to review any ideas you might have around this. Thanks, -Syed On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 04:46 Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Hi Wido, > > If I understand correctly from the

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-21 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 @PaulAngus Sounds like an old bug? This PR was supposed to fix it and is merged: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1483 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1914: CLOUDSTACK-9753 - Update L10N resource files ...

2017-01-21 Thread milamberspace
GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1914 CLOUDSTACK-9753 - Update L10N resource files with 4.10 strings from T… …ransifex (20170121) cc @rhtyd You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running

Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

2017-01-21 Thread Laszlo Hornyak
Hi Wido, If I understand correctly from the documentation and your examples, virtio provides virtio interface to the guest while virtio-scsi provides scsi interface, therefore an IaaS service should not replace it without user request / approval. It would be probably better to let the user set