Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 358
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=105
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 357
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=2
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Hi Dmytro,
That is intentional, which was introduced as part of CLOUDSTACK-5997. Please
refer to CLOUDSTACK-5997
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5997) for more details.
-Suresh
On 19/02/17, 2:29 AM, "Dmytro Shevchenko" wrote:
Hi all,
Hi all,
Is this a bug when you removing account, all templates marked as
Inactive, but 'removed' column = NULL in vm_template table?
CS version: 4.8.0.1
--
Best regards
Dmytro Shevchenko
Thanks for bringing this up. The max data volumes limit of a VM should be based
on the hypervisor capabilities, instead of the hardcoded value. I created the
PR# 1953 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953). Please check.
Even though the underlying hypervisor supports more limit, it is
GitHub user sureshanaparti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM
Updated hardcoded value with max data volumes limit from hypervisor
capabilities.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 356
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=2
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 355
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=78
Failed=17
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
LGTM, code and (regression) tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature