Re: Issue 9367

2017-06-28 Thread Rajani Karuturi
fix for it(PR #1829) is merged and will be available with 4.10.0.0 and the next release of 4.9.* Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 29, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Lotic Lists (li...@lotic.com.br) wrote: Hi all News about issue 9367? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU

Issue 9367

2017-06-28 Thread Lotic Lists
Hi all News about issue 9367? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9367 I need a volume with 6TB. If I create an extended volume with 3x 2TB that issue affect the environment. Env: XenServer 6.5, ACS 4.9.2, Guest Win2k12 R2 HVM Thanks Marcelo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

2017-06-28 Thread Rajani Karuturi
Thanks for confirming. I will keep this RC open for two more days for others to test before next RC. Agree on merging PRs part. That is our release principle in general. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 28, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Kris Sterckx (kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net) wrot

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

2017-06-28 Thread Kris Sterckx
Hi Rajani, Yes we qualified that fix. Can anyone else pls also confirm. To be very clear - this is a generic issue (with native VR based ACS), not tight to Nuage at all. We should not take in new PR's when we move from RC to RC to my view - this way always new issues will pop up. Best, Kris

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

2017-06-28 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 28 juni 2017 om 11:10 schreef Rajani Karuturi : > > > Yes, those shouldn't have been merged. We should have released > faster and then merged. > > Lets think of it as ours and us than theirs and those. > True! So let's see if we can get 4.10 out of the door and get 4.11 out there faste

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

2017-06-28 Thread Rajani Karuturi
Yes, those shouldn't have been merged. We should have released faster and then merged. Lets think of it as ours and us than theirs and those. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 28, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Paul Angus (paul.an...@shapeblue.com) wrote: Those new PRs should not have

[Discuss] Gaps in Smoketest coverage

2017-06-28 Thread Boris Stoyanov
Hi all, Can you guys share your thoughts on particular areas that you think our current smoketest is missing. Let’s try to come up with a list we can work with, so we can 1) Check if there are already part of “Integration Tests Suite” or 2) Create tasks and develop the tests. Thanks, Boris S