[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani commented on issue #803: [BUG] When deploying VM, disk offering for data disks are not all listed

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/803#issuecomment-708200313 @andrijapanicsb I think supporting custom disk sizes will require several backend chagnes since right now it isn't supported --

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] andrijapanicsb commented on issue #803: [BUG] When deploying VM, disk offering for data disks are not all listed

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/803#issuecomment-708198401 It's always easy to see how the old UI works - what offerings are listed there. Afaik, this is multidisk template - where you match offering to a data disk fr

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani edited a comment on issue #803: [BUG] When deploying VM, disk offering for data disks are not all listed

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani edited a comment on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/803#issuecomment-708194558 @utchoang listDiskOfferings returns all the disk offerings, but Primate filters offerings >= 5GB. Need to confirm whether custom disk offerings are supported for

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani commented on issue #803: [BUG] When deploying VM, disk offering for data disks are not all listed

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/803#issuecomment-708194558 @utchoang It already filters offerings >= 5GB. Need to confirm whehter custom disk offerings are supported for datadisk templates or not @andrijapanicsb

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] borisstoyanov commented on issue #803: [BUG] When deploying VM, disk offering for data disks are not all listed

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
borisstoyanov commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/803#issuecomment-708191701 I think so @utchoang, @andrijapanicsb @nvazquez can you confirm cc: @davidjumani This is an autom

[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] davidjumani commented on pull request #17: Remove vendored dependencies

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani commented on pull request #17: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/17#issuecomment-708190591 @onitake Go ahead and merge this so that I can rebase and submit #22 This is an automate

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread David Jumani
A service account with only access to the listKubernetesCluster and scaleKubernetesCluster should work. But to prevent a single API key from being used to mess with all the clusters, multiple users within the service account, mapping to each account which has a cluster with autoscaling enabled w

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang commented on issue #805: [FEATURE] Clicking Menu group name - to choose the first menu item

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
utchoang commented on issue #805: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/805#issuecomment-708150003 @rhtyd There's one problem: This will take away a collapsed menu context. What do you think? This is an a

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread Sven Vogel
Maybe RBAC this is not a bad idea so it’s possible to grant different permissions to users or the service user. Von: Rakesh v __ Sven Vogel Lead Cloud Solution Architect EWERK DIGITAL GmbH Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig P +49 341 42649 - 99 F +49 341 42649 - 98 s.

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread Rakesh v
Service account best suits the need. We can probably apply some RBAC on the account if possible Sent from my iPhone > On 12-Oct-2020, at 2:19 PM, David Jumani wrote: > > Thanks Rakesh. > Do you think it would be better to have the user provide the API keys or > create a service account and u

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] andrijapanicsb opened a new issue #805: [FEATURE] Clicking Menu group name - to choose the first menu item

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
andrijapanicsb opened a new issue #805: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/805 For some time now, while testing and having to click around frequently, I've been very irritated by having to click on Compute, then on Instances (in order to reach Instances as the first m

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #800: kubernetesservicetab: Selecting the right ip

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/800#issuecomment-707723642 Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian :heavy_check_mark:archive. QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/800 (JID-3

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #800: kubernetesservicetab: Selecting the right ip

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/800#issuecomment-707718967 @davidjumani a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani commented on pull request #800: kubernetesservicetab: Selecting the right ip

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani commented on pull request #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/800#issuecomment-707718480 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani commented on a change in pull request #800: kubernetesservicetab: Selecting the right ip

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani commented on a change in pull request #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/800#discussion_r503924846 ## File path: src/views/compute/KubernetesServiceTab.vue ## @@ -327,14 +327,14 @@ export default { this.resource.projectid !== '')

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #804: Adding option to copy resource name

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #804: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/804#issuecomment-707717014 Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian :heavy_check_mark:archive. QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/804 (JID-3

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #804: Adding option to copy resource name

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #804: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/804#issuecomment-707712634 @davidjumani a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani opened a new pull request #804: Adding option to copy resource name

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani opened a new pull request #804: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/804 - Adding option to copy resource name on avatar click - Fixing alignment of console icon ### Before : ![Screenshot from 2020-10-13 18-10-48](https://user-images.githubusercontent.

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani commented on pull request #804: Adding option to copy resource name

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
davidjumani commented on pull request #804: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/804#issuecomment-707712009 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #802: allow adding docker Private registry details while deploying cluster

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #802: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707705834 Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian :heavy_check_mark:archive. QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/802 (JID-3

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #802: allow adding docker Private registry details while deploying cluster

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on pull request #802: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707701365 @Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. ---

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] Pearl1594 commented on pull request #802: allow adding docker Private registry details while deploying cluster

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
Pearl1594 commented on pull request #802: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707700745 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the m

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] shwstppr commented on a change in pull request #802: allow adding docker Private registry details while deploying cluster

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
shwstppr commented on a change in pull request #802: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#discussion_r503890497 ## File path: src/views/compute/CreateKubernetesCluster.vue ## @@ -307,6 +366,7 @@ export default { }, methods: { fetchData () { +

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] shwstppr commented on a change in pull request #800: kubernetesservicetab: Selecting the right ip

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
shwstppr commented on a change in pull request #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/800#discussion_r503880066 ## File path: src/views/compute/KubernetesServiceTab.vue ## @@ -327,14 +327,14 @@ export default { this.resource.projectid !== '') {

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] shwstppr commented on a change in pull request #800: kubernetesservicetab: Selecting the right ip

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
shwstppr commented on a change in pull request #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/800#discussion_r503870382 ## File path: src/views/compute/KubernetesServiceTab.vue ## @@ -327,14 +327,14 @@ export default { this.resource.projectid !== '') {

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread Sven Vogel
Should it possible to grant other users the control about the service user? __ Sven Vogel Lead Cloud Solution Architect EWERK DIGITAL GmbH Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig P +49 341 42649 - 99 F +49 341 42649 - 98 s.vo...@ewerk.com www.ewerk.com Geschäftsführer: Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Tass

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread Paul Angus
In the release notes for the old CCS we strongly recommended that the user created a service account or at least a service 'user'. Ultimately it has to be on the user to control 'who' can do what. paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, Lon

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread David Jumani
Thanks Daan. Users within the same account can alter the cluster, so I'm thinking of a service user within the same account and use the service user's keys. This will also prevent any mess up if the user provides his keys and then later regenerates them. From: Da

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread Daan Hoogland
That is a good question. Is the user going to be the only user responsible for messing up the k8 cluster, or will other users be able to as well? For convenience and if audit is to not lay false balme on a user, I'd say create a system/service account, if several users can mess up each other with i

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland merged pull request #163: Fix create k8s binaries script name

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland merged pull request #163: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/163 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scaler support

2020-10-13 Thread David Jumani
Sounds good. And do you think it would be better to have the user provide the API keys or create a service account and use its keys? From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 6:28 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster Auto-Scale

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #162: Configure Root disk size via Service Offering

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #162: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/162#discussion_r503790186 ## File path: source/adminguide/storage.rst ## @@ -617,6 +617,34 @@ To resize a volume: #. Click OK. +Root Volume size defined v

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang commented on issue #803: [BUG] When deploying VM, disk offering for data disks are not all listed

2020-10-13 Thread GitBox
utchoang commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/803#issuecomment-707585091 @borisstoyanov @rhtyd cc @svenvogel So does that mean the list disk offering will include data disk offering with value `>= 5 GB` and the custom disk offering? -