okay, given the situation your proposal seems right Rohit. Like Daan asked, if
we can prevent this situation in future we need to document it also.
Regards,
Harikrishna
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 4:50 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] N
DaanHoogland commented on PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/81#issuecomment-2056612835
@rohityadavcloud as the build passes can we merge this (cc @jbampton )?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current
situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the
future though.
1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue
in the future?
2. The provider is part of apache and I think the link
https:
All,
The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform
registry website.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109
The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual
resync button on the provider isn't fixing the issue