I'm having issues with the newly added ACL port stuff
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/242#issuecomment-3402010759
October 10, 2025 at 7:29 AM, "Kiran Chavala" mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Kiran%20Chavala%22%20%3Ckiranchavala%40apache.org%3E
> wrote:
>
>
jgotteswinter opened a new pull request, #244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/244
adds userdata datasource and resource
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
kiranchavala opened a new pull request, #231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/231
Updated goreleaser to support 2.12.3
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
bradh352 opened a new pull request, #233:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/233
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
Found a bug in a new feature in 0.6.0. Network ACL rules added 2 features:
1. Ability to add a description
2. Ability to set a rule number
When these are used together, then you update *only* the description, it
does not update the rule in-place, it schedules a removal and re-add,
which resul
kiranchavala commented on issue #227:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/227#issuecomment-3317141578
@bradh352 the issue is fixed by the following pr which will be available in
the upcoming 0.6 release
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-pr
HeinzM opened a new issue, #241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/241
Still getting an error related to [Issue
194](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/194)
[PR 198](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/
Pearl1594 opened a new pull request, #124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/124
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
CodeBleu commented on PR #240:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/240#issuecomment-3381685855
> clgtm except for one thing (and I realise this problem is not introduced
in this PR) the methods are too big. If you can please factor out some blocks
with their h
I've been trying to get this merged for some time now, and not getting any
response from comments on Github, so I thought I'd post here and see if someone
can push this along? :-)
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-cloudstack/pull/447
Thanks,
Jason
vishesh92 commented on PR #225:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/225#issuecomment-3323585698
@sidshas03 Why is this change required? Can you share the failing test run?
The wait here is waiting for the simulator server to be ready. After which the
tests are
Pearl1594 opened a new pull request, #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/120
listApis updated with 4.21.0 API list (with quota, netris, nsx services
enabled)
updated generate.go file to update the kubernetes params for nodeofferings,
nodetemplates and cniconfigdet
Pearl1594 commented on PR #242:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/242#issuecomment-3403336661
@CodeBleu I was testing you observation, by first creating ACL rules using
the previous version 0.5.0
```
resource "cloudstack_network_acl_rule" "default" {
DaanHoogland commented on PR #235:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/235#issuecomment-3381533269
all tests fail
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
ilsaloving-gander opened a new issue, #249:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/249
I tried to import traffic types into terraform, but they all got imported as
"Management".
The problem is that it looks for 'name', which doesn't exist, so it always
de
sureshanaparti commented on PR #577:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/577#issuecomment-3380414778
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Hi All
Thanks for the votes, I will be cutting another RC after testing the following
PR
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245
Regards
Kiran
From: Jason Hollis
Date: Tuesday, 14 October 2025 at 7:41 PM
To: [email protected] ,
[email protected]
kiranchavala commented on issue #227:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/227#issuecomment-3323881968
@bradh352 you can build internally the terraform binary with the pr #204
and cross check
I had cross-checked and the issue was not present
--
Thi
kiranchavala commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3409730192
@Pearl1594
Strangely not hitting when i use your config
```
resource "cloudstack_network_acl_rule" "default" {
acl_id = cloudstack_network_
vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/576
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
weizhouapache commented on PR #563:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/563#issuecomment-3414630988
@shwstppr
can you rebase with 4.20 and address @rajujith 's comment ? thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/573
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Copilot commented on code in PR #218:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/218#discussion_r2371922678
##
website/docs/r/egress_firewall.html.markdown:
##
@@ -55,7 +105,7 @@ The `rule` block supports:
the protocol is ICMP.
* `ports` - (Option
kiranchavala commented on PR #561:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/561#issuecomment-3375105792
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
+1 (Binding)
I’ve tested with some usual VM and network operations using my old
configuration files and worked fine.
Thanks Kiran and everyone involved.
Regards,
Harikrishna
From: Kiran Chavala
Date: Tuesday, 30 September 2025 at 3:01 PM
To: [email protected] ,
dev@cloudstack.
weizhouapache commented on code in PR #574:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/574#discussion_r2409648801
##
source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-service.rst:
##
@@ -653,41 +653,42 @@ Use diverse CNI plugins (Calico, Cilium, etc)
A CNI framework has a
weizhouapache commented on code in PR #573:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/573#discussion_r2391017929
##
source/installguide/hypervisor/kvm.rst:
##
@@ -24,13 +24,11 @@ KVM is included with a variety of Linux-based operating
systems.
Although you
kiranchavala commented on PR #166:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/166#issuecomment-3322651746
@Longsight could you please make sure failing tests pass
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
yann1ck-oder-so opened a new pull request, #581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/581
Because the information was missing.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
blueorangutan commented on PR #561:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/561#issuecomment-3375108796
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/561.
(QA-JID 447)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
+1 (binding)
Tested some usual instance and network (isolated) operations.
Regards,
Suresh
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 3:21 PM Kiran Chavala
wrote:
> Hi ALL
>
> I've created a CloudStack Terraform Provider release candidate for version
> 0.6.0, with the following artefacts up for a vote:
>
> Git
blueorangutan commented on PR #567:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/567#issuecomment-3355673395
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll
keep you posted as I make progress.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
shwstppr commented on PR #560:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/560#issuecomment-3332471744
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
borisstoyanov commented on PR #567:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/567#issuecomment-3355670166
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Pearl1594 commented on PR #239:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/239#issuecomment-3383006895
closing this PR - opening a new one that simplifies the logic and taken into
consideration latest changes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
Jason, I never thought about it, it is just there. If you can not see
the possibility to add a reviewer, or if Co-Pilot is not there as a
possible reviewer, you probably have to be a committer (or be in the
collaborators lists) to have access.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:36 PM Jason Hollis
wrote:
>
shwstppr commented on PR #560:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/560#issuecomment-468595
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
Pearl1594 opened a new pull request, #230:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/230
depends on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/125
So update go.mod to point to the local repo (cloudstack-go)
--
This is an automated message from the A
CodeBleu commented on PR #242:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/242#issuecomment-3403414109
> So yes, there seems to be an issue, but do you think it's a blocker? I
believe if all acl rules have `rule_number` set we can work around the issue
observed.
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #238:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/238#issuecomment-3381536156
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major
rohityadavcloud commented on code in PR #561:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/561#discussion_r2418455649
##
source/adminguide/extensions/inbuilt_extensions.rst:
##
@@ -267,8 +267,181 @@ The VR responds with the correct IP address as configured
in C
HeinzM commented on issue #241:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/241#issuecomment-3385963827
I can't confirm this right now.
If we add the project ID to the network resources, further deployment of the
instances times out. Talos will not be deployed any
kiranchavala commented on issue #241:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/241#issuecomment-3385926645
@HeinzM
Could you confirm if the issue is resolved as i would like to cut another RC
for 0.6 release
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
weizhouapache commented on PR #382:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/382#issuecomment-3414615143
> Is this ready for review @weizhouapache ?
yes @Pearl1594
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
jeanvetorello opened a new issue, #246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/246
## Feature Request: Support for `serviceofferingdetails` in
`cloudstack_service_offering`
### **Problem Statement**
Currently, the `cloudstack_service_offering` resource
All,
Thank you for your comments, feedback and appreciation on the discussion thread.
The proposed text and EOL date have been updated here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
With this change, annual LTS releases will enjoy a total of 24 months of
support starting with
kiranchavala commented on issue #241:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/241#issuecomment-3380710287
@Pearl1594 able to reproduce the issue on main branch as well as the
0.6.0-rc2
config that I used is
```
resource "cloudstac
Pearl1594 commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3407602769
Thanks @CodeBleu - taking your feedback, I tried to see if it was possible
to map if the rules in the new schema (with port) matches existing ones and
updates it sh
borisstoyanov commented on issue #195:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues/195#issuecomment-3380350917
Thanks @shwstppr I think I've noticed this on one of your envs which might
be gone by now, let me close this for now
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
DaanHoogland commented on PR #238:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/238#issuecomment-3381535954
all tests fail
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
I like the Hari's approach, it could help to align major releases to be more
timely next year and allow us to aim for the next regular 4.23 in Q2 and 4.24
LTS in Q3/Q4 next year. If we push 4.22 by 16 weeks, we'll have no new major
LTS release this year.
Fwiw, if we can target 4.23 in Q2 2026
Pearl1594 merged PR #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/120
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudsta
CodeBleu merged PR #240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/240
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
Just curious how the copilot review process works and if this is something that
committers have access to, or only certain people?
kiranchavala closed pull request #218: Fix egress firewall rules to support
all-ports without explicit ports
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/218
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
Pearl1594 commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3412553804
This change you are observing with cks cluster - is most likely unrelated to
the acl rule resource.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
blueorangutan commented on PR #567:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/567#issuecomment-3332628192
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/567.
(QA-JID 440)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
For testing purposes, the packages are available at:
https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.20.2.0-RC20251016T1142/
Kind regards,
Wei
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 2:01 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.20.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch
jgotteswinter opened a new pull request, #243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/243
adds userdata handling, datasource and resource
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
Hi all,
Hope you are having a nice autumn. I am writing to remind that all the
CloudStack Committers and PMC members are entitled for a free ticket for the
CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2025 in Milan.
If you still have not registered, ping me for a promo code.
Registration is available her
blueorangutan commented on PR #560:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/560#issuecomment-3332474712
@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
shwstppr opened a new pull request, #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/575
Related https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/11327
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
DaanHoogland merged PR #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/557
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
kiranchavala commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3412246994
@CodeBleu could you please share you terraform config , so that I can test
it out
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
blueorangutan commented on PR #562:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/562#issuecomment-3345288273
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/562.
(QA-JID 444)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
kiranchavala commented on PR #228:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/228#issuecomment-3322653764
@ianc769 can you fix the RAT check test
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
Hi Bernardo,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I understand your concern about having enough
time between major releases. As I mentioned in my earlier notes, the proposed
timeline was planned with past delays and upcoming events in mind.
Since 4.22 is an LTS release, the primary focus is on sta
Hi Jason
I believe you are using opentofu to do the initialization.
I will cross check again why its not working with opentofu
Can you use terraform init and cross check if it initializes
I have tested it against macos and ubuntu 22.04 and terraform initializes fine
Macos and terraform version
CodeBleu commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3412462590
> @CodeBleu could you please share you terraform config , so that I can test
it out
My biggest concern is why does upgrading the provider cause it to want to
blueorangutan commented on PR #561:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/561#issuecomment-3375106900
@kiranchavala a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
HeinzM commented on issue #241:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/241#issuecomment-3395985745
@kiranchavala
What we can say right now, is that the creation of network ressources is
working.
We discoverd a failure in cloudstack itself. We will open a
bradh352 opened a new issue, #232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/232
It appears IPv6 support is missing in the implementation, the primary
however is when creating a guest network. Most of the other places are tasks
I'm assuming most people aren't usin
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #236:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/236#issuecomment-3381534614
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major
borisstoyanov commented on PR #567:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/567#issuecomment-3332617566
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
blueorangutan commented on PR #575:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/575#issuecomment-3355098528
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/575.
(QA-JID 445)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
CodeBleu commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3403693907
@Pearl1594 After deleting all rules and applying, I then tested doing things
with `rule_number` `1` again and nothing for that rule will actually update,
even though
blueorangutan commented on PR #560:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/560#issuecomment-475808
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/560.
(QA-JID 441)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
borisstoyanov closed issue #195: Autocomplete crashes cmk if at the end of uuid
string
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues/195
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
DaanHoogland closed pull request #234: chore(deps): bump
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-mux from 0.16.0 to 0.21.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/234
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
bradh352 commented on PR #233:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/233#issuecomment-3353177781
@kiranchavala I'm not sure how to add a test for this since there's no
default dual stack network or vpc service offering.
--
This is an automated message from the
blueorangutan commented on PR #567:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/567#issuecomment-3323240926
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/567.
(QA-JID 438)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
shwstppr commented on PR #575:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/575#issuecomment-3355092400
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
Sure Jason, thanks for asking.
Regards,
Harikrishna
From: Jason Hollis
Date: Tuesday, 7 October 2025 at 7:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 4.22.0 Release plan
I would like to get this in to the release for 4.22. Just need a couple
approval
I think it's individuals who've subscribed to Github copilot are able to use it
using their account. I don't see any option for myself when trying to add
copilot as a reviewer:
https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/request-a-code-review/use-code-review
Regards.
_
DaanHoogland commented on PR #235:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/235#issuecomment-3381531931
all tests fail
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
pavanaravapalli commented on PR #581:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/581#issuecomment-3411172688
LGTM
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
CodeBleu commented on PR #242:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/242#issuecomment-3403698385
> I wasn't able to reproduce the issue where in the rule isn't updated
though the plan indicates otherwise. I have created a PR: #245 to handle the
issue wrt it show
Pearl1594 commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3412817672
My apologies @CodeBleu - I didn't understand that comment previously. I've
tried addressing that issue now by adding some checks to the
cloudstack_kubernetes_cluste
harikrishna-patnala merged PR #577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/577
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #237:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/237#issuecomment-3381535216
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major
CodeBleu commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3403663171
@Pearl1594 Below you will see why I have a concern about the current state
of #242 . I feel like there shouldn't be this many issues when "upgrading" the
provider f
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #234:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/234#issuecomment-3381530323
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major
Hi ALL
I've created a CloudStack Terraform Provider release candidate for version
0.6.0, with the following artefacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack
Commit: 919a358fcc951724c2364ee363a9a055258b1fc3
Source release (checksums
CodeBleu commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3412396378
> @CodeBleu Also, i would suggest limiting testing only to terraform for now
and ignore opentofu
>
> Also support is only included terraform provider upgrade i.
CodeBleu commented on PR #245:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/245#issuecomment-3412579294
> This change you are observing with cks cluster - is most likely unrelated
to the acl rule resource.
@Pearl1594 Only change is the updated provider from here!
bradh352 closed issue #227: cloudstack_port_forward: error: Provider produced
inconsistent result after apply
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/227
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
weizhouapache commented on PR #478:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/478#issuecomment-3414626738
closed due to #581
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
shwstppr commented on issue #195:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues/195#issuecomment-3370349672
@borisstoyanov I tried this but couldn't reproduce. I even tried with
different environments and on different hosts.
Interestingly your error mentions my local direc
kiranchavala commented on PR #230:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/230#issuecomment-560692
@Pearl1594 could you please add documentaions for the new parameters
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
Hi all,
The key features, improvements, critical fixes, and other planned updates for
4.22 are now in place. The current health of main branch also looks good.
I’m currently in the process of preparing the packages and system VM templates.
Please expect the first Release Cut either today or ear
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
