RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congrats Vijay. Regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 12:53 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati Congratulations Vijay! --Sanjay > -Original M

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

Hi Radhika, Few additions in the section 15.27.11.2 N-Tier InternalLB for VPC feature : 1. In section 15.27.11.2.3 you can mention that there in the network offerings a default offering for Internal LB is present with the name "DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworksWithInternalLB" . 2. I

Re: Review Request 14079: marvin tests for IP Address reservation within a network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14079/#review26137 --- Ship it! Ship It! - abhinav roy On Sept. 16, 2013, 11:11 a.m

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Hi, Here are some of the steps which are missing from the release notes, 1. Before upgrading from any version to 4.2 we need to register the new 4.2 systemvm templates . This step is there in section 3.3 i.e for upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2, but it is missing in section 3.1 and 3.2 . 2. Sect

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Radhika Puthiyetath; Harikrishna Patnala Subject: Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes Le 23/09/2013 18:47, Abhinav Roy a ecrit : > Yes , that’s true Milamber. It's my fault, Somehow I overlooked it. > But, the check for 8096 API port is al

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

o: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Radhika Puthiyetath; Harikrishna Patnala Subject: Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes Le 23/09/2013 10:48, Abhinav Roy a ecrit : > Hi, > > Here are some of the steps which are missing from the release notes, > >

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

-4.2 4) systemvm-hyperv-4.2 5) systemvm-lxc-4.2 Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Abhinav Roy wrote: > Yes , that's true Milamber. It's my fault, Somehow I overlooked it. > But, the check for 8096 API port is already there

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

/cloudstack-agent/lib/libvirtqemuhook /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu # chmod +x /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu . Restart libvirtd. # service libvirtd restart . Start the agent. # service cloudstack-agent start === Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Abhinav

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congrats Rajesh :) -Original Message- From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:58 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala Congrats Rajesh!! --Sanjay > -Original Message- > Fro

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

The issue is closed now. Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Harikrishna Patnala Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:10 AM To: Abhinav Roy Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Radhika Puthiyetath Subject: Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2

RE: Upgrade failed because system VM was created using old template?

Hi Indra, The Json deserialization error is an expected one, after you upgrade. It ll keep coming until the new systemvms come up using the new systemvvm template. All the steps you have executed are correct and you don't need to change those. As soon as you upgrade and start management server,

RE: Upgrade failed because system VM was created using old template?

started. I will upload the management logs and will send the URL to you separately. Thank you. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Abhinav Roy wrote: > Hi Indra, > > The Json deserialization error is an expected one, after you upgrade. > It ll keep coming until the new systemvm

RE: Upgrade failed because system VM was created using old template?

Hi Indra, Can you check in your KVM host whether the ssvm and cpvm are created or not? try " virsh list " and see if the vms are there? Is it a Rhel host or Ubuntu host?? Also, check what is the entry in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties file for the "resource" parameter. Thanks and regar

RE: Wiki access

Please provide me edit permissions, username : abhinavr Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:47 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Wiki access Please provide me edit per

Re: Review Request 14247: added support for ispersistent parameter in networkoffering create method in marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14247/#review26729 --- Ship it! Ship It! - abhinav roy On Sept. 20, 2013, 7:38 a.m

Re: Review Request 14334: CLOUDSTACK 4705: Fixed domain memory limits test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14334/#review26770 --- Ship it! Ship It! - abhinav roy On Sept. 25, 2013, 11:06 a.m

RE: master not perfect:(

I faced the same issue, then I logged on to the xenserver host and deleted the tags, restarted the MS but even after that i could see these errors. Finally I rebooted the Xen Host and after that the error was not seen. Filed a bug for the same, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-33

RE: [Doc] IP Address Reservation is Ready for Review

Hi Radhika, It looks good to me. Thanks and regards, Abhinav From: Radhika Puthiyetath Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 5:44 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava; Abhinav Roy Subject: [Doc] IP Address Reservation is Ready for Review Hi, IP

[IP Reservation] Is VM creation using the reserved IPs on cloudstack managed hosts supported?

Hi, Is creation of VMs using the reserved IP (after doing IP reservation) on cloudstack managed hosts supported? Because when I tried to do that the VM got destroyed as soon as it was created. While on hosts which are not managed by cloudstack VM creation using reserved IPs went through. Tha

RE: [IP Reservation] Is VM creation using the reserved IPs on cloudstack managed hosts supported?

Hi, Is creation of VMs using the reserved IP (after doing IP reservation) on cloudstack managed hosts supported? Because when I tried to do that the VM got destroyed as soon as it was created. While on hosts which are not managed by cloudstack VM creation using reserved IPs went through. Th

RE: [QA]question on cloudstack-usage service

Same issue is seen in my setup also. Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 11:15 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [QA]question on cloudstack-usage service Wido/Kelven, This issue not

RE: [QA]question on cloudstack-usage service

iguration in the rpm. (In case people want to install the usage server on another server than the management server) Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message----- > From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:55 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.or

[ACS42][QA] Test cases for Dedicated Resources - Public IP Addresses and VLANs per Tenant feature uploaded

Hi, I've uploaded some test cases for the feature here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+-+Public+IP+Addresses+and+VLANs+per+Tenant+Test+Plan Jira id tracking the feature is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-704 Thanks and regard

RE: [ACS42][QA] Test cases for Dedicated Resources - Public IP Addresses and VLANs per Tenant feature uploaded

- Public IP Addresses and VLANs per Tenant feature uploaded Hi Abhinav, Thanks for the test plan. Could you add test cases to verify the usage related changes? Otherwise the plan looks good to me. Thanks, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citr

[Discuss] UI for the Dedicated VLANs per Tenant

Hi, I am doing the QA for the feature Dedicated VLANs per Tenant and I had some queries about what kind of UI will be there for this feature. In the current implementation after introduction of Non-contiguous VLANs we have the following : 1. If there is an existing VLAN range IP1 - IP10

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh

Congratulations Devdeep :) -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked D

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

Congratulations Sailaja!! :) -Original Message- From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 9:06 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada Many congrats Sailaja!! > -Original Message- > From: Chi

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

Congratulations Swamy :) -Original Message- From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 9:05 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy Hearty Congrats Swamy!! > -Original Message- > From: Chip C

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

Congratulations Sangeetha !! -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:cloudst...@aprateek.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 11:57 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan Congrats Sangeetha ! On 24/05/13 11:56 AM, "Prasanna San

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham !! :) -Original Message- From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:50 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Many many congratulations Saksham! -Original Message---

RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congrats Sanjeev!! :) -Original Message- From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:38 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu Congratulations Sanjeev. Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- Fro

Getting "Refusing to design this network, the physical isolation type is not MIDO" while deploying a VM with new network from UI

Hi, I am getting this error while deploying a VM on XENSERVER : 2014-08-06 21:42:22,774 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-6c894fdd) ===START=== 10.144.7.6 -- GET command=createNetwork&response=json&sessionkey=IyiV1YiWuFVSGa7GynZv5T12nLk%3D&networkOfferingId=94cef53e-49ec-4a9f-a0f

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for Drivers)

a VM in any state for that matter. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for Drivers)

a VM in any state for that matter. Thanks, abhinav roy

Review Request 24425: vGPU Automation : VM Lifecycle Tests

: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24425/diff/ Testing --- Testing : Executed the tests on a vGPU setup with Hosts having K2 drivers and ensured that all the lifecycle testcases were working fine. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for Drivers)

Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for Drivers)

Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24425: vGPU Automation : VM Lifecycle Tests

comments. https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/08/19/55564a94-e910-4dd1-bb72-75d7fcc4353d__0002-Adding-VM-lifecycle-test-cases.patch Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for Drivers)

deploy VM cases working fine and the function is checking for the vGPU drivers on that deployed VM or stopped VM or a VM in any state for that matter. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for vGPU resources & VM lifecycle tests)

lled setup and ensured all lifecycle test cases are working fine and the function is checking for the vGPU resources in a vGPU VM. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for vGPU resources & VM lifecycle tests)

. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for vGPU resources & VM lifecycle tests)

vGPU VM. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for vGPU resources & VM lifecycle tests)

s is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24420/#review51272 --- On Aug. 22, 2014, 2:09 p.m., abhinav roy wrote: > > --- > This is an

Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py

cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy

Review Request 30555: Minor typo correction in test_deploy_vgpu_vm.py

0555/diff/ Testing --- Tested on my local environment. Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py

ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy

Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py

;s zone, ... === TestName: test_03_op_host_capacity_disable_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy

Review Request 32469: Added vMotion related tests for VMFS type storage

/testpath_storage_migration.py 2a92914 tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 7f609e7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32469/diff/ Testing --- Testing dont on my local setup with VMFS and primary storage. Thanks, abhinav roy

RE: introduction

Welcome back Murali :) Regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 5:21 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: introduction All, Just wanted to let the community know that I have decided to work on Apach