Re: SystemVM documentation

appliances in various formats. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> ____ From: Raja Pullela Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 2:11:22 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: SystemVM documentation

SystemVM documentation

Hi Rohit, Can you please point to the documentation you may have for creating the 4.11 SystemVMs ? Best, Raja DISCLAIMER == This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for the u

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

Hi Ilya, I would like to attend and will send the details on community efforts - collaborate on testing/running BVTs/Regressions tests. Best, Raja Engineering, Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 > >-Original Message- >From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.co

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Wei Zhou and Rene Moser are now PMC members

congratulations Rene and Wei!! cheers! Raja Pullela Engineering Team, Accelerite, www.accelerite.com, 2055 Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 On 3/17/17, 12:36 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: dear devs, The PMC has invited Rene Moser and Wei Zhou over the last couple of weeks to

Re: Welcoming Wido as the new ACS VP

Thank you Will for all the great work! cheers! Raja Pullela Engineering Team, Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 On 3/16/17, 10:30 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: Hello Everyone, It has been a pleasure working with you as the ACS VP over the past year. I would l

Re: Welcoming Wido as the new ACS VP

congratulations Wido! All the best with your new responsibilities! cheers! Raja Pullela Engineering, Accelerite, www.accelerite.com 2055 Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 On 3/16/17, 10:30 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: Hello Everyone, It has been a pleasure working with you as

Re: GSoC projects

e: > > >> > > >> > Hello, Projects can be selected from student proposals as well > > >> which start > > >> > on 20th march '17 there are a couple of JIRA tickets tagged as > > >> gsoc2017 and > > >> > gs

Re: GSoC projects

Hi, As I understand from the GSoC page, Student volunteers now have to register and propose a project. But, there is a one issue, couple of student volunteers that I know wanted some help and direction on choosing/proposing the projects. I have asked them to join our Devlist. If we can make

Re: Modern template hosting

sorry Wido… forgot… thank you for correcting! On 2/27/17, 4:50 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > Op 27 februari 2017 om 7:17 schreef Raja Pullela > : > > > Hi will, > > I believe, we didn’t get to close ‘getting a mirror on Apache’ because we > needed s

Re: Modern template hosting

help assist getting the content there. For now, we have replicated the download.cloud.com content to ‘s3.download.accelerite.com’. Also, we are working on a set of steps/procedure to help with this change. I will update everyone in about a week’s time on the details. Best, Raja Pullela

Re: Virtual Router : Marvin test gap analysis

Hi Murali, Great initiative… and VR is one area that could help greatly if we have more automation. we have done high-level analysis on VR functionality/automation recently and have posted our findings to the wiki under “high-level Automation analysis” section. Please take a look, [1] ht

4.9 testing on XenServer and VMWare

Hi, Can you please let me know if you are testing 4.9 release with XenServer or VMWare ? if so, can you please share which version you are testing? Best, Raja Senior Manager, Product Development Accelerate, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite 2055, Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Phone:

Re: [VOTE] Split Marvin to its own repository

Hi Rohit, same question as Rene has posted, impact on older releases – will have issues on older releases. I know that the older releases have marvin code which can be used. Also, this will require changes on the CI side to pull the correct repo for Marvin. +1, if Bharat can modify CI imp

Re: XenServer 7

. Are you look at anything specific feature/functionality in XS 7.0? can you share what it is ? Best, Raja Pullela Senior Manager, Product Development Accelerate, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite 2055, Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Phone: 1-408-216-7010 On 7/13/16, 11:58 AM, "

Re: XenServer 7

we are going to use XS7 for our testing and will be running BVTs/smoke tests against the same. Best, Raja Pullela Senior Manager, Product Development Accelerate, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite 2055, Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Phone: 1-408-216-7010 On 7/12/16, 2:17 PM, "

Re: 4.9+ release

Hi, As we are planning/discussing the releases, any plan around the PRs in Open state? - there are about 147 in Open state and oldest of these goes back to Jun 2015. 1) Can we look at giving extra time to committers to push these PRs ? 2) Can we make exception to committing Test PRs even if

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

BTW, added this as a line item on the Roundtables on the Collab page on the wiki. > On May 31, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > +1, hope we will be able to discuss this at the Collab this week and decide > on the next steps. > > best, > Raja Pullela >

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

+1, hope we will be able to discuss this at the Collab this week and decide on the next steps. best, Raja Pullela Senior Manager, Product Development Accelerate, 2055,Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Phone: 1-408-216-7010, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite > On May 31, 2016, at 10

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

vY= > > > > >Kind regards, > >Paul Angus > >paul.an...@shapeblue.com >www.shapeblue.com >53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >@shapeblue > >-Original Message- >From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@accelerite.com] >Sent: 16

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

, www.accelerite.com, @accelerite On 5/16/16, 6:25 PM, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >Hi Indra, > >I will check this and get back. > >Best, >Raja >Senior Manager, Product Development >Accelerite, >2055, Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA >Phone: 1-408-21

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

t;whose alignment with CloudStack will not shift. I hesitate to >implicate the red tape of Apache Foundation, but perhaps the fabled >CloudStack alliance organization would be a good way to handle this >long term. > >On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Raja Pullela > wrote: >

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

ply losing the content on download.cloud.com overnight will make everyone >look bad > >Kind regards, > >Paul Angus > >paul.an...@shapeblue.com >www.shapeblue.com >53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >@shapeblue > >-Original Message- >From: Raja

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

m >download.cloud.com? > > > >Kind regards, > >Paul Angus > >Regards, > >Paul Angus > >paul.an...@shapeblue.com >www.shapeblue.com >53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >@shapeblue > >-Original Message- >From: Raja

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

Hi Indra, I will check this and get back. Best, Raja Senior Manager, Product Development Accelerite, 2055, Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Phone: 1-408-216-7010, www.accelerite.com, @accelerite On 5/14/16, 11:45 AM, "Indra Pramana" wrote: >Dear all, > >Is there an alternative solu

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

Hi Paul, Thank you for the additional file details and I will request wido to copy these as well. BTW, I agree with you there is every copy of CloudStack out there and reason why I have requested Wido to download all the old files as well. Looks like we missed few and get these uploaded as

RE: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com > On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:36 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Just to summarize... and to close this thread for now, > > 1) short term - we will move the content to cloudstack.apt-get.eu

RE: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

they are going to be moved. On 30/03/16, 11:06 AM, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >Just to summarize... and to close this thread for now, > >1) short term - we will move the content to cloudstack.apt-get.eu >2) long term - can someone from PMC or Cloudstack Apache Infra help find ou

RE: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

> Ideally, this stuff should be hosted on an Apache Cloudstack > > infrastructure or atleast the main community source ( > > cloudstack.apt-get.eu, shapeblue repo, etc.). > > > > On 25 March 2016 at 15:00, Sebastien Goasguen > > > wrote: > > > &g

RE: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

@Sebastien, thanks for the feedback. please note that the goal of this exercise was not to impact any users during this migration and hence the efforts to place the content at a location where we could move it to. Since Wido is ok with hosting the content on 'cloudstack.apt-get.eu', it is eve

Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

Hi, Citrix has been hosting "download.cloud.com" for quite some time now and it holds the System Templates for all the releases and some tools. Going forward, this content needs to be moved from "download.cloud.com". So, we will be moving this content to "cloudstack.a

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

*|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Daan, Will, > > I have tested Daan's original PR-1427, and it looks good. I am > running into a build issue with the 1438 - nothing related to the > checkin. Hope to resolve it later this weekend or

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

gt; > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw > @CloudOps_ > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > >> thanks Raja >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Raja

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

dOps_ > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > >> thanks Raja >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Raja Pullela >> > > >> wrote: >> >> > Daan, I will try to test this out.. >> > >> > -

RE: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Bharat, I will work Sanjeev on fixing the failed tests. We can create a bug to track this. Best, Raja -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 1:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Bharat Kumar Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

Daan, I will try to test this out.. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:57 PM To: dev Subject: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368 People, these were irritating me. I wrote a quick fix [1]. An

RE: Important Pending Items

Hi Sebastien, On item (3) - the BVTs have been running consistently (with same passrates) and haven't had the time to automate the process of reporting to an external site. Bharat and Sanjeev are working on CI - running BVTs/Regression, working on getting it run automatically and consistent

MS with Java 1.8 running into SSL issue

Hi, I am running into an issue, reported bug - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8519 SSVM and CPVM are up but the Agent status blank. Can you please let me know if anyone has run into this and if there is a work around ? Thanks, Raja

RE: [DISCUSSION] Collab for Spring 2016

+1 for the two day collab - a day of hackathon and a day of meetings/events. -Original Message- From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:34 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Collab for Spring 2016 +1 on North America Co

RE: FYI: master branch is on 4.9.0 now

Hi Remi, Ilya, I had the same question... do we have a release cadence ? Best, Raja -Original Message- From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:40 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: FYI: master branch is on 4.9.0 now Remi, Thanks

RE: BVT Results Google Page -

at 11:03 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >wrote: > >> >> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Raja Pullela >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > Please take a look - ACS Master BVT Dashboard - >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17i_Bd78SrKoLnu0cFpwXbC0R-YKB

RE: BVT Results Google Page -

xenserver basiczone. Also Xenserver with advanced zonegrew to the highest coverage level on wednesday but that is not visible either. Actually I think only 100% should be green. What do you think? On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 10:49

BVT Results Google Page -

Please take a look - ACS Master BVT Dashboard - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17i_Bd78SrKoLnu0cFpwXbC0R-YKBTqs9sOw15hQLP3o/pubhtml I am still trying to find a way to upload the test results related to these runs. Best, Raja

RE: BVT Report for the week of 1/5

graphical so I can kid myself I understand it ;) On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Happy New Year to all! > > Please see the BVT report > KVM Basic - 97.1% > XS Basic - 94.0% > KVM Adv - 85.8% - action item on me to add configurations for the new >

BVT Report for the week of 1/5

Happy New Year to all! Please see the BVT report KVM Basic - 97.1% XS Basic - 94.0% KVM Adv - 85.8% - action item on me to add configurations for the new tests to run XS Adv - 79.1% - action item on me to add configurations for the new tests to run Failed Tests - same tests from last BVT repor

RE: template available on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/

m the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Raja Pullela" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, 2 January, 2016 05:33:41 > Subject: RE: template available on > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_6

RE: template available on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/

-systemvm64-master/ I don't mind bz2-ing the VHD, but it's not clear what ACS/HyperV expects. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Raja Pullela" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Friday, 1 Jan

RE: template available on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/

> cluster_size: 2097152 > > > Also, VHD is completely untested, let me know if it boots for you. :) > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Raja Pullela&q

RE: template available on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/

ww.nux.ro - Original Message ----- > From: "Raja Pullela" > To: "CloudStack Dev (dev@cloudstack.apache.org)" > Sent: Monday, 21 December, 2015 16:12:53 > Subject: template available on > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/ > Hi Remi,

template available on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/

Hi Remi, Can you please create a bz2 format template for the hyperv ? http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/ -currently this has a zip file, macchinina-hyperv.vhd.zip Thanks, Raja

RE: BVT report for week of 12/14

-ISOLATED.cfg https://github.com/schubergphilis/MCT-shared/blob/master/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg But the tests do not depend on anything special. The templates I use can be found here: http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/ Cheers, Wilder On 15 Dec 2015, at 12:37, Raja Pullela

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

nd the report because we want to see which > tests are included in this BVT you guys run. > > Cheers, > Wilder > > >> On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:48, Raja Pullela wrote: >> >> -1, >> >> Reason: >> the BVT passrate on Xen and KVM Ad

RE: BVT report for week of 12/14

are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. On 15/12/15, 3:15 PM, "Raja Pullela" mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.c

RE: BVT report for week of 12/14

, like Boris, Remi and I already did over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder > On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:45, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the BVT report for this week - > - XS Basic - 97.0% (4.6 RC passrate 96.9%) > - XS Adv - 79.5% (4.6 RC passrate 93.4%)// went do

RE: BVT report for week of 12/14

loudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: BVT report for week of 12/14 > On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the BVT report for this week - > - XS Basic - 97.0% (4.6 RC passrate 96.9%) > - XS Adv - 79.5% (4.6 RC passrate 93.4%)// went dow

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

-1, Reason: the BVT passrate on Xen and KVM Adv has dropped to below 80% please see the BVT report for the week of 12/14 -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:58 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apa

BVT report for week of 12/14

Hi, Here is the BVT report for this week - - XS Basic - 97.0% (4.6 RC passrate 96.9%) - XS Adv - 79.5% (4.6 RC passrate 93.4%)// went down from 92.7% to 79.5% - KVM Basic - 98.6% (4.6 RC passrate - 98.6%) - KVM Adv - 79.7% (4.6 RC passrate - 96.3%) // went down from 96.4% to 79.7% Summary

BVT report for the week of 12/7

Here are the BVT results based on the latest master, going forward please expect to see an email on the BVTs beginning of every week: - XS Basic - 97.3% (4.6 RC passrate 96.9%) - XS Adv - 92.7% (4.6 RC passrate 93.4%) - KVM Basic - 98.6% (4.6 RC passrate - 98.6%) - KVM Adv - 96.4% (4.6 RC passrate

RE: release managers wanted

would like to volunteer... please count me in, if this is still open! -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:35 PM To: dev Subject: Re: release managers wanted shortly: check if PRs have enough review and merge to the r

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

+1 BVTs shown consistent passrates and the failures are all test cases issues. Here is the latest update on the BVT side: KVM Basic 98.6% - 1 test failed/test case issue Xen Basic 96.9% - 2 tests failed/test case issue KVM Adv 96.3 % - 4 tests failed/test case issues Xen Adv 93.4% - 7 tests faile

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

BVT ran this morning - but, don't think I have picked up this latest build, so, will report again later tomorrow... BVTs are almost at 100% on KVM and XS both Adv/Basic. Failed cases were all test related... hope to do a +1 tomorrow! - integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_07_list_default_iso

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

heers, > Wilder > On 06 Nov 2015, at 12:11, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > resent the report... > Test case issues - we can ignore. we will should fix them anyways. > VM Deployment issues - analyzing them... probably not blockers for now until >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

you report. Do you consider them as blockers, are they related to open issues, shall we discard them ? > On Nov 6, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Here is the BVT report on the RC - > > >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

· integration.smoke.test_vm_snapshots.TestSnapshots.test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot //test case issue · integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_07_list_default_iso //test case issue :setup //test case issue From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Here is the BVT report on the RC - [cid:image001.png@01D118B0.21037340] Failed test cases: · integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn.test_vpc_remote_access_vpn //failed due to VM deployment · integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcSite2SiteVpn.test_vpc_site2site_

RE: test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config

From: Raja Pullela<mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com> Sent: ‎04-‎11-‎15 15:55 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: RE: test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config Remi, Rajani, can you push this PR in ?

RE: test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config

Remi, Rajani, can you push this PR in ? Best, Raja -Original Message- From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 7:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config Cool, thanks Remi

Re: test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config

; Remi > > > > >> On 30/10/15 17:44, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >> >> Hi Michael >> >> Can you please add a wait for the template to download before the VM >> creation? >> >> Raja >> Begin forwarded message: >> F

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

ocal should be the same as the current Link Local IP, but they are different! Current ==> 10.71.153.33; Cached ==> 169.254.1.130 \n From: Wilder Rodrigues Date: November 2, 2015 at 4:04:31 PM GMT+5:30 To: Rajani Karuturi , Remi Bergsma , Raja Pullela , d

Re: test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config

Super, thanks Remi! > On Oct 30, 2015, at 10:35 PM, Remi Bergsma > wrote: > > Hi Raja, > > Talked to Michael and he will improve the test soon. > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > >> On 30/10/15 17:44, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >>

test_vpc_vpn.py failing 2 BVTs on all Advnetworking config

Hi Michael Can you please add a wait for the template to download before the VM creation? Raja Begin forwarded message: From: Raja Pullela mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com>> Date: October 29, 2015 at 11:49:59 AM GMT+5:30 To: "CloudStack Dev (dev@cloudstack.apache.org

CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

Hi Wilder The changes from this commit are failing the HyperV and VMware BVTs. Can you please let me know if these tests were passing in your environment- VMware, Hyperv? Raja Error - "the cached link local should be same current local ip, but they are different!"

Few BVTs failing

Hi, In the latest BVTs, following tests are failing consistently - * 2015-10-29 00:27:43,987 - CRITICAL - FAILED: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn: ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 329, in run\ntestMethod()\n', ' File "/root/cl

RE: BVT report - 10/22

ected to fail. Once I'm done running it I will reduce the retries to 5 in that case. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Oct 2015, at 18:12, Raja Pullela mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi wilder, Internal Lb tests, I need to investigate the failures, some race condition when I ran it.

Re: BVT report - 10/22

a DC and will run the smoke/test_network.py with hardware set > as true and also as false. Will publish the report here once done. > > Cheers, > Wilder > > >> On 22 Oct 2015, at 16:01, Raja Pullela wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Following is the latest

Re: BVT report - 10/22

I didn't run them this time. > On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:45 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > I presume simulator runs are still 100% ? > >> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22 >>

BVT report - 10/22

Hi, Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22 Xen Basic : 94.0% KVM Basic: 97.1% - glad to see the reboot ssvm/cpvm are fixed Xen Adv: 91.9% - test_internal_lb and test_network needs code fixes, possibly! KVM Adv: 93.6% - glad to see the reboot ssvm/cpvm are fixed - test_internal_lb and test_

RE: BVT Report 10/14

t the list in Jira is almost done. Is everything in there? Thanks; Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Oct 2015, at 21:17, Raja Pullela wrote: > > BVT Report - 10/14; No change from earlier report - 10/5 > > - Simulator Basic - 100% > > - Simulator Adv

RE: [ACS460] QA days (part one)

+1 and we can possibly use slack - using a separate channel or group? -Original Message- From: Timothy Lothering [mailto:tlother...@datacentrix.co.za] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:19 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ACS460] QA days (part

BVT Report 10/14

BVT Report - 10/14; No change from earlier report - 10/5 - Simulator Basic - 100% - Simulator Adv - 100% - XS Basic - 98.6%, 1 failure - XS Adv - 95.5%, 5 failures - KVM Basic - 94.2%, 4 failures - KVM Adv - 92.6%, 8 failures Working wit

RE: [SUSPECTED SPAM]new features in 4.6 ?

@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM]new features in 4.6 ? Any chance VMWare vCenter 6 support will be added? We're limited to 5.5 and I need improved OSX support in 6. Thanks for everyone's hard work! Dustin > On Oct 8, 2015, at 2:56 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Following are

RE: [SUSPECTED SPAM]new features in 4.6 ?

Following are shown with 4.6.0 on the page - cwiki - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap 1) Improve Object Storage, CloudStack-8640, Wido 2) Snapshot Improvements, CloudStack-8663, Anshul 3) Deploy user Instance from VM Snapshot, CloudStack-8676, Sateesh 4) Netscaler In

RE: BVT report 10/5

Raja -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 2:18 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: BVT report 10/5 Thanks Raja, couple additional comments in-line. > On Oct 5, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Changes in c

RE: BVT report 10/5

it should? Regards, Remi On 05/10/15 21:08, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >Changes in code base since last BVT report - 10/1 >- CLOUDSTACK-8848: ensure power state is up to date when handling >missing VMs in powerReport - resmo<http://jenkins.buildacloud.or

BVT report 10/5

Changes in code base since last BVT report - 10/1 - CLOUDSTACK-8848: ensure power state is up to date when handling missing VMs in powerReport - resmo / detail

Re: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

Hi Miguel... guess, I don't see/understand the improvement here. thanks for your contributions though! best, Raja > On Oct 1, 2015, at 6:38 PM, Miguel Ferreira > wrote: > > Hi Raja, > > point is to avoid any conditional coding to run BVTs. the setup is simple > and takes all the tests u

RE: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

is.com<mailto:mferre...@schubergphilis.com> On 01 Oct 2015, at 14:19, Raja Pullela mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com>> wrote: ok, thanks Remi. let me think if there is any other solution or please propose one? I would like to run all BVTs. Another solution can be - since

RE: BVT report 10/1

...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 5:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: BVT report 10/1 Raja, Is anyone on your side looking at those test_ssvm failures ? On Oct 1, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Blockers - as open in ACS JIRA: > > - CloudS

RE: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

reported all as OK only to realise it had skipped a test due to not having a certain setup. If it had failed, I would have noticed sooner. Regards, Remi On 01/10/15 13:36, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >Hi Miguel, > >I have a setup that runs pretty much everything we have under "sm

RE: BVT report 10/1

fixed before. Regards, Remi On 01/10/15 13:20, "Raja Pullela" wrote: >Blockers - as open in ACS JIRA: > >- CloudStack-8927 / > >- CloudStack-8924 / Test case failure. Waiting for PR-900/902 to be >merged. > >- CloudStack-89

RE: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

et skipped. > > I think the test should fail if the config is not right, or otherwise be > excluded if the indentation is to not run them. > > Cheers, > \ Miguel Ferreira > mferre...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:mferre...@schubergphilis.com> to:mferre...@schubergphilis.com

BVT report 10/1

Blockers - as open in ACS JIRA: - CloudStack-8927 / - CloudStack-8924 / Test case failure. Waiting for PR-900/902 to be merged. - CloudStack-8923 / - CloudStack-8915 / - CloudStack-8876 / - CloudStack-8697 / related to test case failure:

RE: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

Hi Miguel, Can you please add some checking in the setup method for the configuration parameters and if it is not available, can you skip this test? Raja -Original Message- From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 5:52 PM To: Miguel

RE: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM

thanks Miguel ! From: Miguel Ferreira [mailto:mferre...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:01 PM To: Raja Pullela Cc: dev Subject: Re: test_nicira_controller.py is failing on all Advzone - XS, KVM Hi Raja, That test needs a NSX cluster. With that in place, the

RE: BVT report 9/29

t;> --hypervisor=simulator >> >> Marvin Init Started >> >> === Marvin Parse Config Successful === >> >> === Marvin Setting TestData Successful=== >> >> Log Folder Path: /tmp//MarvinLogs//Sep_30_2015_09_13_45_5NC2QK. >> All logs

RE: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

; -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:48 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py > > >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Raja Pullela wrot

RE: jenkins disk full ?

Btw, edison, pradeep, rayeesn - are not active anymore - talluri may be? I think. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:01 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Pierre-Luc Dion ; tall...@apache.org Subject: Re: jenkins disk f

RE: jenkins disk full ?

Yes, please give access to PL or couple of other folks - Rajani or other PMC members? -Original Message- From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Pierre-Luc Dion ; tall...@apache.org Subject: R

RE: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

On Sep 30, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Sebastien, any BVT tests failing is a blocker and needs to be fixed - which > is the reason for Blocker. We already have a fix. > Right, but that’s a fix in the test itself, no an issue with the cloudstack “core”. In any c

RE: BVT report 9/29

Miguel, please see the defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8924 Let me know if you have any questions, Raja -Original Message- From: Miguel Ferreira [mailto:mferre...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:43 PM To: Sebastien Goasguen Cc: dev ; Bor

RE: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

close the issue ? > -Original Message- > From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2015 12:12 > To: CloudStack Dev (dev@cloudstack.apache.org) > Subject: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py > > Hi, > > Filed this

  1   2   >