I think I saw it
thanks,
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sonal Ojha wrote:
> I have raised review via review board as well.
>
>
> On Monday, March 3, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> Sonal,
>>
>> please do this via the review board. This might be inconvenient but it
>> gives us nicer trackrecor
I have raised review via review board as well.
On Monday, March 3, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Sonal,
>
> please do this via the review board. This might be inconvenient but it
> gives us nicer trackrecords then mail threads do.
>
> thanks,
> Daan
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Sonal Ojha
, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > --Alex
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
> >> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
&
:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
>> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
>> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
>>
>> I have to refer to the project owner here.
>> @David: if I add
Yes.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
>
> I have
I have to refer to the project owner here.
@David: if I add someone to 'Contributors', should he be able to add
comments to tickets?
thanks,
Daan
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Sonal Ojha wrote:
> Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
> privileges be granted as we
Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
privileges be granted as well ??
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha
> wrote:
> > Sonal
>
>
> You should have the rights now
>
> --
> Daan
>
>
--
Thanks and R
Hello,
I am attaching the final patch(
*CLOUDSTACK-3272-Changes-to-allow-publishing-of-event.txt*) with this mail,
it has the changes based on the global config parameters (mentioned below)
events would be published or not based on the very parameter.
"publish.action.events"
"publish.alert.events
Please find the changes attached as a text file, I am working on moving the
hard coded value for the boolean parameter as a global config parameter.
Kindly take a look to know if the approach is fine.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sonal
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote:
> I am attaching the patch with the email kindly let me know your comments.
Sonal,
Attachments are stripped by the listserv. You might have to include the text.
?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Murali Reddy
> Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" , Chiradeep
> Vittal
>
>
>
> Sonal,
>
> There may be mix up on the problem state
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote:
> Sonal
You should have the rights now
--
Daan
Hello,
Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-3272 to
myself.
Thanks,
Sonal
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Murali Reddy
> Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> To: "de
can't this be done by the client that
>> is receiving the events? Note that multiple clients can subscribe to the
>> event bus: this requirement is specific to one client?
>>
>> From: Sonal Ojha
>> Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:36 PM
>> To: Chiradee
be to the
> event bus: this requirement is specific to one client?
>
> From: Sonal Ojha
> Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:36 PM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
>
> One o
11:36 PM
To: Chiradeep Vittal
mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>>
Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
One of the use case be to delete only vm power on/
One of the use case be to delete only vm power on/off events from the event
queue, other be to persist all the update events on virtual machines on the
queue. The map of configuration parameters would be helpful to decide such
behaviors.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chirade
Some more description of the use cases would be helpful. What is the pain
point it is addressing?
On 12/11/13 3:26 AM, "Sonal Ojha" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>As per the description in the bug I would like to propose to introduce a
>new instance variable configParameters of type HashMap to the
>EventCate
Hello,
As per the description in the bug I would like to propose to introduce a
new instance variable configParameters of type HashMap to the EventCategory
class.Currently, it could store one config parameter
"publish.action.events"(key as String) and True (value as Boolean) but
later it could add
19 matches
Mail list logo
