e.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][SECURITY] Feature: Secure CloudStack Communications
Awesome work - thank you Rohit.
On 8/23/17 12:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> No regression is seen in the smoke test run, however, I'll leave the PR open
> for some time to gather fur
___
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:09:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][SECURITY] Feature: Secure CloudStack Communications
>
> All,
>
>
> The feature is ready for your review, please see:
>
> https
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS][SECURITY] Feature: Secure CloudStack Communications
All,
With upcoming features such as the application service (container service), and
existing features such as SAML, they all need some sort of certificate
management and the idea with the proposed feature is to bu
All,
The feature is ready for your review, please see:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2239
Thanks and regards.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:59:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS][SECURITY] Feature: Secure
All,
With upcoming features such as the application service (container service), and
existing features such as SAML, they all need some sort of certificate
management and the idea with the proposed feature is to build a pluggable
certificate authority manager (CA Manager). I would like to kick
