Xenserver in this case.
--
Erik
Den tirsdag 23. februar 2016 skrev ilya
følgende:
> There is no good reason i am aware of.
>
> CloudStack was designed under a premise it will be ran by Cloud hosting
> and not enterprise. Hence there was not much emphasis on cloudstack
> instance name VS displa
There is no good reason i am aware of.
CloudStack was designed under a premise it will be ran by Cloud hosting
and not enterprise. Hence there was not much emphasis on cloudstack
instance name VS display name.
With that said, down the road a feature has been added only to VMware to
enable display
pecialist
> LeaseWeb Technologies B.V.
>
> T: +31 20 316 0235
> M:
> E: n.tava...@tech.leaseweb.com
> W: http://www.leaseweb.com
>
> Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands
>
>
>
> From: Erik Weber [terbol...@gmail.c
_
From: Erik Weber [terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 9:41 AM
To: dev
Subject: [DISCUSS] Hiding the instance name from users
Hi,
Before I file a bug I'd like to check if anyone know a good reason for
hiding the instance name, that is the typical i-2-123-VM name, from us
Hi,
Before I file a bug I'd like to check if anyone know a good reason for
hiding the instance name, that is the typical i-2-123-VM name, from users?
There are cases where an error returns the instancename rather than
name/uuid, and this is confusing when users have no means to map that to
someth
