Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround All, I got the following from TF support: Hello there, provider versions are immutable in the registry. Therefore, when you deleted and recreated the version in Github, the hash has changed, and the registry will refuse to serve it. Your

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the future though. 1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue in the

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-15 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
] New terraform git tag for registry workaround I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the future though. 1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue in the future? 2. The provider

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the future though. 1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue in the future? 2. The provider is part of apache and I think the link https:

[DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-15 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform registry website. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109 The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual resync button on the provider isn't fixing the issue