h sessions unnecessary. Still exploring and doing some PoC in
this direction.
Regards.
From: Pierre-Luc Dion
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 8:24:20 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NextGen VR?
Hi Rohit,
So look like OpenWRT could be a good alternative then, but
m packages (java etc) that we
> > need for systemvm/VR.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > From: Pierre-Luc Dion " target="_blank">
> > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 21:51
> > To: dev " target=&qu
p-api) however
> that is probably not supported for their lts/legacy release, we'll also
> face issue with installing/configuring custom packages (java etc) that we
> need for systemvm/VR.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> ________________
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
>
release, we'll also face issue with
installing/configuring custom packages (java etc) that we need for systemvm/VR.
Regards.
From: Pierre-Luc Dion
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 21:51
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NextGen VR?
>From a certain point of
use-case
> (i.e. no separate template installation required for CKS).
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 16:45
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NextGen VR?
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Like
___
From: Pierre-Luc Dion
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 16:45
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NextGen VR?
Hi Rohit,
Like it! Our VR system is due for some rethinking!
I don't have much points to add to issues you highlight, it seems pretty
complete.
Here are some more
Hi Rohit,
Like it! Our VR system is due for some rethinking!
I don't have much points to add to issues you highlight, it seems pretty
complete.
Here are some more features or ideas that would be interesting to see in a
new VR system:
- Use or support for routing protocol, such as BGP or OSBP so
All,
We've over the years create a VR that largely is stable but we've discussed the
pain of maintaining, extending, and upgrading VRs both in lists and in
user-groups and CCC conferences.
On a high-level the pain points are:
* It's difficult to debug, investigate VR for operators and supp
