On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:39 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try something
out with markdown.
I used pandoc to convert some docbook files to markdown and
I really like markdown, very readable in the state that it is in before it
is converted to whatever else. I also like reStructuredText.
Outputting to different formats is important I guess, however, I would say
that most real reading that is done is done in html.
With that said, I love beautiful
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:26:36AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Any change should be done post 4.2
Actually, now's the time IMO. Master is the 4.3 target at this point, so
shouldn't we make larger changes now? (moving docs to their own repo and
re-designing any tooling choices
I agree on splitting the docs out into their own repo that pull requests can be
sent to as bugs in the docs are found or different installations are tested and
documented.
With the current state of the docs being one of the greatest barriers to entry
for new CloudStackers, or even when running
12:39 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] feedback
On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:39 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try
something out
it as a project, define deadlines, and deliver one at a time.
Any suggestions?
Regards
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 9:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] feedback
On Sep 4, 2013, at 4:43 PM
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
yes you can...
http://daringfireball.net/**projects/markdown/syntax#**precodehttp://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode
No, syntax highlighting
Kudos to you Sebastian!
I am glad to see it in Markdown.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
yes you can...
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try something
out with markdown.
I used pandoc to convert some docbook files to markdown and I used a
structure for a book based on 'The little mongodb' book.
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 4:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] feedback
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try something
out with markdown.
I used pandoc to convert some docbook files to markdown and I used a structure
for a book based on 'The little mongodb' book.
We can generate epub and pdf using latex.
See:
Thanks Sebastien, I will read these tonight. I'm a big fan of Markdown
and am using it for all my notes and docs.
Alex
On 9/2/2013 4:19 PM, sebgoa wrote:
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try something
out with markdown.
I used pandoc to convert some
On Sep 2, 2013, at 5:19 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try something
out with markdown.
s/folks/docs
I used pandoc to convert some docbook files to markdown and I used a
structure for a book based on 'The little
Love the idea of using markdown! Much easier to write then docbook.
Any idea if it supports the syntax highlighting markdown features github
offer?
e.g.
```shell
#!/bin/bash
echo hello world
```
Had some slight issues building on OSX due to me missing the font used and
certain laTeX plugins.
I
By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
yes you can...
http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode
Alex Hitchins
On 9/2/2013 8:31 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
Love the idea of using markdown! Much easier to write then docbook.
Any idea if it supports
On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Love the idea of using markdown! Much easier to write then docbook.
Any idea if it supports the syntax highlighting markdown features github
offer?
e.g.
```shell
#!/bin/bash
echo hello world
```
Had some slight issues
By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
yes you can...
http://daringfireball.net/**projects/markdown/syntax#**precodehttp://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode
No, syntax highlighting isn't part of the markdown spec, which is why I
asked. Its
On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
yes you can...
http://daringfireball.net/**projects/markdown/syntax#**precodehttp://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode
No, syntax
yes please, I had issues with missing fonts...
First issue was font, I was missing Consolas. Grabbed it from here
http://www.fontpalace.com/font-details/Consolas/ and just installed using
the fonts manager in OSX.
Then I hit an issue with sectsty.sty not being found. Thankfully the tex
package
On Sep 2, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
yes please, I had issues with missing fonts...
First issue was font, I was missing Consolas. Grabbed it from here
http://www.fontpalace.com/font-details/Consolas/ and just installed using
the fonts manager in OSX.
Then I hit
20 matches
Mail list logo
