Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

2015-07-17 Thread sebgoa
On Jul 13, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote: >> Hey >> >> Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I >> would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the de

Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

2015-07-13 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 13-Jul-2015, at 1:41 pm, Rene Moser mailto:m...@renemoser.net>> wrote: Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML. I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in notifications about builds on PR, P

Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

2015-07-13 Thread Wido den Hollander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote: > Hey > > Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I > would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML. > > I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in > notific

[Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

2015-07-13 Thread Rene Moser
Hey Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML. I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in notifications about builds on PR, PR comments, and Jenkins builds. I am suggest to make a seprate ML for t