Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-13 Thread Gabriel Bräscher
working on the release. > > 3.1.2. Voting may take four flavors: > 3.1.2.1.+1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action should be performed." In > general, this vote also indicates a willingness on the behalf of the voter > in "making it happen" >

RE: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-11 Thread Paul Angus
med." In general, this vote also indicates a willingness on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen" http://cloudstack.apache.org/bylaws.html Kind regards Paul Angus -Original Message- From: Gabriel Bräscher Sent: 10 September 2021 14:15 To: dev Subject

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-10 Thread Gabriel Bräscher
sts across three hypervisors - that is not to say no release has no > reported issues (in fact they all do 🙂). > > > Regards. > > ____ > From: Gabriel Bräscher > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 18:39 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle > > Th

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-09 Thread Rohit Yadav
8, 2021 18:39 To: dev Subject: Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle Thanks all for helping with the discussion. Yes, Rohit. I need to answer a few pings, sorry for the delay :-) I totally agree with you and Paul, the costs of releasing are high, especially for the release manager(s) which dedicates a lot of

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-08 Thread Gabriel Bräscher
ths) - > http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/nightly/ > > > 5. finally - I would say if you or anyone wants to work on a release (call > it whatever, regular, LTS) - just propose and do! > > > Regards. > > > From: Daniel Augusto Veron

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
s) - http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/nightly/ 5. finally - I would say if you or anyone wants to work on a release (call it whatever, regular, LTS) - just propose and do! Regards. From: Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 202

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-07 Thread Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador
Hi Gabriel, thanks for opening this discussion. I'm +1 on it. My considerations: - We've to put a lot of efforts to support 3+ LTS simultaneously, which doesn't make sense. Regular versions will give us some breath and will reduce rework. - Although the EOL is well defined, it seems we don't h

RE: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-02 Thread paul_a
1:37 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle I like the notion of LTS every 2 years and having 1 or 2 regular releases per year, like the Ubuntu model. Typically, upgrading our cloud from a major release is a big level of effort, especially around QA to make sure the upgrade does

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-09-02 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
gt; From: Gabriel Bräscher > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 11:14 PM > To: dev > Subject: [Discussion] Release Cycle > > Hello, > > I would like to open a discussion regarding the project release cycle. More > specifically on the following topics: > > 1. LTS and Regular relea

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-08-31 Thread David Jumani
and follow up on it From: Gabriel Bräscher Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 11:14 PM To: dev Subject: [Discussion] Release Cycle Hello, I would like to open a discussion regarding the project release cycle. More specifically on the following topics: 1. LTS and

[Discussion] Release Cycle

2021-08-31 Thread Gabriel Bräscher
Hello, I would like to open a discussion regarding the project release cycle. More specifically on the following topics: 1. LTS and Regular releases 2. Releases period 3. Enhance roadmap and Release cycle for users 1 LTS and Regular releases It has been a while since the last regular rel