[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1621: Fix a little issue from PR1610 if the db.properties ...

2016-08-02 Thread milamberspace
Github user milamberspace commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621 Jira ticket done. CLOUDSTACK-6671 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1621: Fix a little issue from PR1610 if the db.properties ...

2016-08-02 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621 We dont need a PR for master. It will be forward merged. If you can create a jira ticket for this (even better would be to reuse the one used in PR1610), it will be useful. --- If your pr

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1621: Fix a little issue from PR1610 if the db.properties ...

2016-08-02 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621 LGTM! Thanks for the fix. Could you also open one for master? It needs to be fixed there as well. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply app

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1621: Fix a little issue from PR1610 if the db.properties ...

2016-08-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1621 LGTM thanks @milamberspace --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and w