Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Thanks @serg38 @syed @mlsorensen @pdion891 for your feedback, comments,
review and tests. I think we've enough reviews, tests/lgtms for merging the PRs
now. I'll proceed with merging this PR,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 Thanks, both of them are environment related failure and
ignore-able.
I'm not sure about the first error, most like environment related. The
second one could be related to ping
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Thanks @rhtyd It didi it. Now two of them still fail but the rest are
successful
```
Tests out-of-band management ownership expiry across multi-mgmt server ...
=== TestName:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 okay I see, the issue is that the marvin you've installed is old
and does not have the necessary API definitions (cmd, response classes). I
recommend doing a clean build of the branch
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@rhtyd We run marvin tests on management server. Do we need any special
configuration in test data for out-of-band-managment ?
The errors seem to point at missing methods in
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 thanks for sharing the test results. I can see why all the
out-of-band management tests may fail, these tests require that the mgmt server
is able to send/receive UDP traffic from/to the
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Failed tests
```
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes
(integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName:
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | Status : FAILED ===
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Successful tests. RHEL 6 management server, advanced networking, Vmware
5.5/6 hypervisors
```
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for project ... === TestName:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
We finished testing on vmware 5.5 and 6. Overall much better state. We have
still failure in execution of the following tests:
test_privategw_acl
test_routers_network_ops
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Thanks @murali-reddy for confirming this. Based on that this PR LGTM. Thank
you guys for fixing the smoke tests. This is a very needed requirement for
getting stable releases :+1:
---
If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@pdion891 thanks, this PR fixes marvin tests. Blueorangutan (bo) is just a
bot that facilitates running the marvin tests and sharing the results. It uses
Trillian to deploy an environment and run
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Could it be possible this PR is specific to blueorangutan tests or they are
to fix marvin tests too?
we could be able to test if marvin, need to know how for blueorangutan.
Since
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@syed Thanks for testing out. Tests related VPC private gateway, redundant
VPC are still failing as noted [1]. I am working on fix. We want to proceed
with this PR with those failing tests
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@PaulAngus were there any tests that were expected to fail? If so I can
exclude them and try to debug the ones that were supposed to run correctly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
My tests have finished. I had run into some issues where one of the tests
got stuck when cleaning everything. I have yet to determine the root cause.
I've had 8 test cases. Here is the
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I'm running the smoke tests on my setup. I will post the results as soon as
they have completed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mlsorensen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
If the three test failures don't represent regressions, we should probably
get this merged per Rohit's suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
We will post results later today for Vmware 5.5/6 tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@PaulAngus I will test this out on my XenServer7 setup. I would need some
help to understand how you are running these. I'll PM you on Slack
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@NuxRo np, I was pinging most of the active people on the list who may have
the time/motivation to contribute towards next releases. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Sorry guys, am unable to test currently and cannot LGTM code that I
obviously don't understand.
Hopefully a coder will step up shortly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
All, we need a LGTM on this one to get the ball moving on release work.
Pinging several -- @karuturi @swill @wido @NuxRo @nvazquez @serg38
@GaborApatiNagy @harikrishna-patnala @JayapalUradi
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@karuturi can you help run BVT tests on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@karuturi @swill @wido @NuxRo @nvazquez we believe this PR is ready to
merge. However, we need to cross check the test results. Would one (or more
of you) be able to test this PR in order to
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@karuturi can you provide a test LGTM from CloudMonger?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Yes +1 LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Thanks @serg38 so does that mean a +1/LGTM on this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@rhtyd Yes I totally agree. It could take a while to flash out the
remaining issues and we should complete the release and allow merging
outstanding PRs in the meantime.
---
If your project is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell @PaulAngus @serg38 @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy
@borisstoyanov and others -- we've made some progress in this PR and since
there are some merge/review activity on other PRs does it
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-140)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 2051 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-138)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27408 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-137)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 22765 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-136)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 28652 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-134)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 36954 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-133)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 32364 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-132)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 35553 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-131)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 38763 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@rhtyd Vmsnapshot tests fail on vmware 6.0 due to issue resolved in PR1677.
1677 is targeted for 4.9 so I agree on removing that test for ACS 4.8
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Common intermittent failure issues: (1) unable to contact ssvm/agent, times
out, (2) unable to ssh into guest VM possibly due to vm's nic not up/available:
1. Re-ran tests on
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-58
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-120)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 36521 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-121)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 32085 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-122)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 29791 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-119)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26964 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-57
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-56
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
While all smoke tests are running okay on kvm, based on recent runs, the
outstanding issue seem to be with vpc/vpn and redundant virtual routers in
xenserver and vmware based environments:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-55
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Re-ran failed tests on env `pr1692-t115-kvm-centos7`, all okay (previous
failures were due to (1) failed to ssh into vm, (2) ssvm communication
failures/timing issue, (3) ):
Test |
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-114)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 29116 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-113)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 25631 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-115)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 23189 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-50
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-49
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Re-ran tests in env `pr1692-t108-kvm-centos7`, all pass. The test failures
were due to (1) heisenbug and occurred due to issues with the api response
lacking a status key when the template/iso is
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
To be accurate the tests failed due to CLOUDSTACK-9529 [3]: Marvin Tests Do
Not Clean Up Properly
As the environment ran out of public IP addresses VRs to use.
This only
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Tests from xenserver failed due to an environmental issue, I'll rekick
another round once outstanding issues are resolved. Tests on kvm failed due to
corner case/env specific cleanup/setup
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-110)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30353 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-108)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 24485 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-109)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 11075 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
With new changes, I'll kick three trillian env for xenserver, vmware and
kvm and see what the test results look like.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-48
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 @NuxRo Thanks for your suggestions, I've incorporated those changes
and tweaked few failing tests to use macchinina template. One of the causes for
failures we've found was that nics on
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 Macchinina is 64bit.
In KVM I add it as "Other PV (64bit)", though adding it as CentOS or Debian
should also work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@NuxRo Then 'Other Linux (64-bit)' will be appropriate. It works for the
time being as PV with current vmware but could fail at some point. For example
when we were testing @rhtyd tiny template
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell @rhtyd @borisstoyanov Do you have to do anything to make
test_lb_internal to pass on Vmware? No matter what we try we get 3 exceptions
2016-10-04 07:18:24,897 - CRITICAL -
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-105)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30998 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I suggest also to change OS type in test_internal_lb.py and test_vpc_vpn
for
"macchinina vmware"
from
"ostype": "Other PV (64-bit)",
to
"ostype": "Other Linux (32-bit)"
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
All tests have passed against CentOS6 environment, though there is a
tearDown/cleanup issue with one of the tests (test_vpc_vpn.py) that I'm
investigating.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-103)
Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26470 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Fixed and re-ran tests on Env `pr1692-t100-xenserver-65sp1-marvin`:
Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.317
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + kvm-centos6) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@blueorangutan test centos6 kvm-centos6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 @abhinandanprateek diagnosed the same issue earlier today.
Reviewing #871, it is composed of commits
fbc2e2e983938e6a16b7e44eb19db9e659b7a570 and
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell Sorry my bad. It is PR 871 . The reason the test fails is:
```
After running test_vm_snapshots.py we're getting exception on
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot as it was expected
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 #571 has no Marvin test case changes and fixes the CPVM. How does
it address the `test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot` error?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
BTW failure of test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot is due to PR571 which
modified marvin test to succeed against incorrect functionality.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-100)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30113 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-98)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30313 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I am LGTM on this now. Thanks @NuxRo @PaulAngus @rhtyd for fixing maccinina
template. VPN_VPC and INTERNAL_LB test work for Vmware
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-96)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 12351 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-91)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 22521 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Sure, though I may not have the time to do it today, but soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@NuxRo Thanks, I'll test and confirm for xen and kvm in few hours. Can you
also update the repo on how anyone can build the templates from source?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
VMWare LGTM
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
VP Technology
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
From: NuxRo
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Can you guys let me know if this runs OK on all your HVs? I've rebuilt the
kernel
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/testing/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-46
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Based on today's test runs and fixes, most tests run fine on kvm. At the
moment, several fixes were done to several tests to ensure they run on vmware
and xenserver as well. I've kicked a new pkg
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-45
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-44
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I've tested my TinyLinux templates against vmware, xenserver and kvm and
they are working alright. On VMware, the networking worked with the loaded
e1000/e1000e kernel module.
Wrt
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Thanks @NuxRo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-90)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 29144 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Hi guys, sorry this has caught me in my holidays so no ability to do
anything about it.
In the following week I'll work on a new minimal kernel with improved
support for VMware stuff.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell based on the latest result results, the errors have significantly
gone down. We will still need to re-investigate some of the error (which I
thought were fixed, but still failed).
---
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-89)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26541 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@PaulAngus @jburwell I've created a tinycore linux basd template here with
e1000, e1000e and vmxnet3 driver loaded (lsmod to confirm). Once started, it
ships only with openssh server and dhcp
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-88)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 24192 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell we may ignore that specific test, or retest the vmnet3 test on
vmware against the default built-in (centos5 based) template. @NuxRo ping, can
you help fix the macchanina template to
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I agree with @PaulAngus on URL fix. So if we want to have this PR to get in
asap I am on board but some smoke tests will continue failing until driver
issue in the template is addressed
---
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
