[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2017-01-26 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 LGTM. Test results are good. I am merging this now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2017-01-26 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 I rebased the code against master and it is compiling with Java 8 and passing all tests. ```[INFO] [INFO]

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-24 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Trillian test result (tid-727) Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 33546 seconds Marvin logs:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-23 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos6) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-23 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan test centos7 kvm-centos6 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-23 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-421 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-23 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-416 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-09 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @rhtyd Understood! I have one more PR pending after this which should make IPv6 usable in Basic Networking. 4.11 would be great to get this in. --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-08 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @wido due to the scope of the changes, I'll hold this PR until releases graduate. We'll get back to reviewing, testing this after the branches are cut. /cc @murali-reddy @abhinandanprateek

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-02 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Seems good looking at the tests, right? These VPC tests have been failing for some time and do not seem to be related to this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-28 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Trillian test result (tid-473) Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 39222 seconds Marvin logs:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-28 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Trillian test result (tid-471) Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6 Total time taken: 33700 seconds Marvin logs:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-28 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Trillian test result (tid-472) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 28250 seconds Marvin logs:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-28 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-28 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan test matrix --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-20 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-194 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-20 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-20 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-16 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-11-16 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan test matrix --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-25 Thread NuxRo
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Wido, Will do, but need to wait until next week to get some help re getting IPv6 on my test rig. As soon as I have feedback, I'll post here. Lucian -- Sent from the

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-21 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @NuxRo The first test would be to run this code and actually see that the API returns a IPv6 address which you can then use to reach your Instance. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-66 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @blueorangutan package @NuxRo sure --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread NuxRo
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Thanks I'd be happy to give this a run when all the bits are in then, @wido @rhtyd if the orangutan could build some packages when the time comes, that's be great. ;-) --- If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @NuxRo There are two things to it. First, yes, it saves a lot, a lot of code by using SLAAC/EUI-64. No need to configure dnsmasq or anything else. No failure possible where the VR is not

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread NuxRo
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @wido As an IPv6 rookie I am trying to wrap my head around this. Why can't we just DHCP out to instances a /128, in a similar manner we do with IPv4? Is this all to avoid too much code

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @rhtyd Thanks! I've updated and squashed the commits. Commit message now also shows more information. Feedback is welcome! Currently working on the Security Grouping for IPv6. Will send

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 Thanks for the PR @wido I can review/test next week, this in general looks great. Can you squash your commits with the commit message reflecting the JIRA id in the format `CLOUDSTACK-:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-10-20 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700 @NuxRo and @rhtyd Would you mind taking a look at this one? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not